INTR
Price
$5.22
Change
+$0.17 (+3.37%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.3B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NU
Price
$13.90
Change
+$0.34 (+2.51%)
Updated
Aug 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
67.29B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

INTR vs NU

INTR vs NU Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 10, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Inter & Co, Inc. (INTR) vs. Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both INTR and NU operate as digital banking platforms primarily serving Brazil and expanding in Latin America, with NU maintaining a significantly larger customer base and market capitalization.
  • Recent market activity shows INTR trading near multi-month lows despite reporting record quarterly net income, while NU has experienced more moderate price pressure year-to-date.
  • INTR has emphasized U.S. market entry and a “Rule of 50” operational target, contrasting with NU’s focus on profitability milestones in Mexico and broader regional scaling.
  • Valuation metrics indicate INTR trades at lower forward earnings multiples compared with NU, presenting a potential trade-off between growth scale and relative pricing.
  • Sector exposure remains concentrated in financial services for both, with performance influenced by Brazilian macroeconomic conditions, credit demand, and regulatory developments across Latin America.
  • Relative performance over recent weeks reflects differing market reactions to earnings updates, with INTR exhibiting higher volatility than NU.

Introduction

Inter & Co, Inc. (INTR) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) represent two prominent players in the digital banking sector focused on Latin American markets. This comparison examines their business models, recent stock behavior, and positioning within the current environment to assist traders and investors evaluating relative opportunities in fintech and regional financial services. The analysis targets market participants seeking data-driven insights on peers with overlapping yet distinct growth trajectories and risk profiles.

INTR Overview and Recent Performance

Inter & Co, Inc. operates a digital banking platform in Brazil with segments spanning banking and spending, investments, insurance brokerage, and an e-commerce marketplace. The company has pursued expansion into the United States through branch licensing and product launches such as wearables. In recent market activity, INTR shares have traded near 52-week lows following broader sector pressure, even as the company reported record second-quarter net income and loan growth. Sentiment has been shaped by strong operational metrics alongside concerns over valuation compression and macroeconomic factors in Brazil. Year-to-date returns reflect significant underperformance relative to broader indices, with elevated trading volumes accompanying earnings releases.

NU Overview and Recent Performance

Nu Holdings Ltd. provides a digital banking platform across Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, and other markets, emphasizing credit, payments, and investment services. The company has achieved scale with over 100 million customers and continued geographic diversification. In recent market activity, NU shares have declined from earlier 2026 peaks but maintained relative stability compared with smaller peers. Performance has been supported by ongoing revenue expansion, improving efficiency metrics, and initial profitability contributions from Mexico operations. Market sentiment reflects steady customer acquisition and regulatory progress, tempered by regional economic variables and currency considerations.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots execute strategies across thousands of tickers using varied styles, timeframes, risk parameters, and performance statistics. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions earn placement in the trending section. Available bots display a wide range of historical win rates, drawdown profiles, and return metrics, allowing users to align selections with individual objectives. The platform provides transparent statistics on each bot’s track record to support informed evaluation. Trending AI Robots

Head-to-Head Comparison

Inter & Co, Inc. (INTR) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) both target underserved banking customers through technology-driven platforms in Latin America, yet differ markedly in scale. NU commands a larger customer base and market capitalization, supporting broader diversification into Mexico and other markets, while INTR emphasizes a super-app ecosystem and recent U.S. entry. Growth drivers for INTR include loan expansion and operational targets such as the Rule of 50, whereas NU benefits from established network effects and improving margins. Recent momentum shows INTR experiencing sharper price swings around earnings despite positive fundamentals, contrasting with NU’s more measured response. Risk factors encompass credit quality in emerging markets for both, with INTR carrying additional execution risk tied to international expansion. Market sentiment favors NU for proven scale and INTR for potentially attractive relative valuations.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, earnings catalysts, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a modest probabilistic edge to NU due to its larger scale, steadier recent momentum, and demonstrated progress toward regional profitability. INTR presents compelling operational metrics and valuation considerations that could support outperformance under favorable credit and macroeconomic conditions. The assessment remains probabilistic and subject to ongoing market developments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
INTR vs. NU commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INTR is a Hold and NU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2026
Stock price -- (INTR: $5.22 vs. NU: $13.93)
Brand notoriety: INTR and NU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INTR: 61% vs. NU: 81%
Market capitalization -- INTR: $2.3B vs. NU: $67.29B
INTR [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.3B. NU’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $67.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INTR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • INTR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, INTR is a better buy in the long-term than NU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INTR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INTR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NU is a better buy in the short-term than INTR.

Price Growth

INTR (@Regional Banks) experienced а -8.74% price change this week, while NU (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

INTR is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.

NU is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.83% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NU($67.3B) has a higher market cap than INTR($2.3B). NU has higher P/E ratio than INTR: NU (21.49) vs INTR (7.89). NU YTD gains are higher at: -18.996 vs. INTR (-39.694). NU has less debt than INTR: NU (1.92B) vs INTR (15.8B). NU has higher revenues than INTR: NU (11.9B) vs INTR (9B).
INTRNUINTR / NU
Capitalization2.3B67.3B3%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-39.694-18.996209%
P/E Ratio7.8921.4937%
Revenue9B11.9B76%
Total CashN/A1.21B-
Total Debt15.8B1.92B824%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INTRNU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
INTR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RIOX26.860.23
+0.84%
Tidal Trust II Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RIOT ETF
BYRE27.290.19
+0.72%
Principal Real Estate Active Opp ETF
TBF25.470.08
+0.32%
ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury
VRIG25.09-0.01
-0.02%
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grd ETF
MORT9.89-0.02
-0.20%
VanEck Mortgage REIT Income ETF

NU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NU has been loosely correlated with BBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NU jumps, then BBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NU
1D Price
Change %
NU100%
-0.66%
BBD - NU
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
INTR - NU
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.88%
ITUB - NU
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
BSAC - NU
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.91%
BSBR - NU
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More