INTR
Price
$5.77
Change
+$0.06 (+1.05%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
2.55B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NU
Price
$12.19
Change
+$0.10 (+0.83%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
59.26B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

INTR vs NU

Header iconINTR vs NU Comparison
Open Charts INTR vs NUBanner chart's image
INTR vs NU Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Inter & Co, Inc. (INTR) vs. Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both INTR and NU are Brazil-based digital banking platforms expanding in Latin America, with strong client growth but recent share price volatility amid market pressures.
  • INTR trades at a lower trailing P/E of 10.8 versus NU's 23.4, offering better value based on current earnings, with a market cap of $2.86B compared to $67B.
  • Recent quarters show robust performance: INTR hit record Q1 with 44M clients and $9.5B credit portfolio; NU boasts higher ROE (30%) and revenue growth (44% YoY quarterly).
  • YTD returns favor INTR at 22.6% over NU's 17.6%, though both lag the S&P 500 over one year.
  • AI-driven strategies are key for both, with INTR accelerating its super app via AI and NU integrating AI underwriting in new markets.
  • Risk profiles differ: NU shows superior profitability margins (41%) but higher expansion risks; INTR emphasizes stability with diversified services.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines INTR and NU, two leading digital banks from Brazil challenging traditional finance through technology-driven platforms. Both companies serve millions in Latin America, focusing on banking, credit, investments, and insurance via mobile apps. Traders seeking high-growth fintech exposure in emerging markets and investors eyeing relative performance in the financial services sector will find this analysis relevant. Amid recent market volatility, their contrasting valuations, client expansions, and AI integrations highlight key trade-offs in momentum, risk, and positioning.

INTR Overview and Recent Performance

Inter & Co, Inc. (INTR) operates as a digital financial super app, offering banking (checking accounts, cards, loans), investments, insurance brokerage, and e-commerce in Brazil and the U.S. Founded in 1994 and headquartered in Belo Horizonte, it has grown to over 44 million clients. Recent market activity saw shares dip 3.3% to $6.48 amid broader selloffs, yet YTD gains stand at 22.6%, outpacing the S&P 500's 8.1%.

In the latest quarter, INTR reported record results: revenue up 26% YoY to $2.44B, EPS matching estimates at $0.18, with net income supported by a $9.5B credit portfolio and AI-enhanced super app features. Sentiment has improved on governance reforms and analyst upgrades (Zacks #2 Buy), though 1-year returns trail at 6.7% due to prior volatility. Key drivers include low funding costs, diversified loans, and U.S. expansion approvals, bolstering stability in a competitive neobank landscape.

NU Overview and Recent Performance

Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU), parent of Nubank, delivers a digital banking platform across Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, and beyond, with services like credit/prepaid cards, payments, loans, and premium tiers. Headquartered in São Paulo since 2013, it serves over 130 million customers. Shares fell 3.2% to $13.80 recently, with YTD return at 17.6% but 1-year at 7.8%, reflecting consolidation after strong multi-year gains.

Recent performance highlights robust growth: quarterly revenue surged 44% YoY, with ROE at 30% and profit margins near 41%. Q4 results showed $4.9B revenue and $895M net income, driven by customer additions and AI underwriting expansions. However, valuation concerns and Mexico credit risks have tempered momentum, alongside U.S. charter considerations. Analysts note balanced profitability amid international push, maintaining appeal for growth-oriented investors.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots from a library of 351, curated for current market conditions like volatility in semis, industrials, and small caps. These bots generate real-time signals for stocks, ETFs, and crypto, employing strategies such as trend trading, AI/ML with take-profit/stop-loss corridors (e.g., TP 3%/SL 2%), and fundamental analysis. Performance highlights include annualized returns up to +285% (e.g., +167% for nuclear/SMR plays, +135% for leveraged tech), win rates from 51% to 88%, trading 3-18 tickers across 5-60 minute timeframes. Virtual and brokerage agents add risk management, outperforming the S&P 500 in dips and trends. Explore these high performers to align with dynamic conditions—visit the page for copy trading opportunities.

Head-to-Head Comparison

INTR and NU share digital banking models in Latin America but diverge in scale and focus. NU's growth drivers emphasize aggressive multi-country expansion (Mexico, Colombia) and superior ROE (30% vs. 14%), with higher revenue growth (44% quarterly) and margins (41%), fueled by vast 130M+ customer base. INTR counters with diversified revenue (insurance, e-commerce) and lower risk via conservative lending, trading at a discount (P/E 10.8 vs. 23.4, P/B 1.4 vs. 5.9).

Recent momentum favors INTR's YTD edge, but NU shows better long-term stability (beta 1.01 vs. 1.03). Risks for NU include expansion costs and credit pressures; INTR faces competition intensity. Sector exposure is fintech/banking, with sentiment lifted by AI catalysts—INTR's super app, NU's underwriting—positioning both for relative outperformance versus traditional peers.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors INTR for its undervaluation (lower P/E, attractive multiples versus historicals), trend consistency post-Q1 record (44M clients, AI acceleration), and stability catalysts like U.S. branching amid Brazil's digital shift. While NU excels in scale and profitability, its premium pricing introduces caution. Observable factors suggest higher probability of near-term upside for INTR in volatile conditions, though both merit monitoring for fintech rotation.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
INTR vs. NU commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INTR is a StrongBuy and NU is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2026
Stock price -- (INTR: $5.77 vs. NU: $12.19)
Brand notoriety: INTR and NU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INTR: 36% vs. NU: 66%
Market capitalization -- INTR: $2.55B vs. NU: $59.26B
INTR [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.55B. NU’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $59.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INTR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • INTR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, INTR is a better buy in the long-term than NU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INTR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NU’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INTR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both INTR and NU are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

INTR (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.76% price change this week, while NU (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

INTR is expected to report earnings on Aug 17, 2026.

NU is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NU($59.3B) has a higher market cap than INTR($2.55B). NU has higher P/E ratio than INTR: NU (18.80) vs INTR (9.37). NU YTD gains are higher at: -27.180 vs. INTR (-31.095). NU has less debt than INTR: NU (1.92B) vs INTR (15.8B). NU has higher revenues than INTR: NU (11.9B) vs INTR (9B).
INTRNUINTR / NU
Capitalization2.55B59.3B4%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-31.095-27.180114%
P/E Ratio9.3718.8050%
Revenue9B11.9B76%
Total CashN/A1.21B-
Total Debt15.8B1.92B824%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INTRNU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
INTR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TARA3.900.25
+6.85%
Protara Therapeutics
TNGX30.941.12
+3.76%
Tango Therapeutics
TURB1.570.02
+1.29%
Turbo Energy SA
PLOW47.190.38
+0.81%
Douglas Dynamics
NKE44.93-1.03
-2.24%
Nike

INTR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTR has been closely correlated with BBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INTR jumps, then BBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INTR
1D Price
Change %
INTR100%
+1.05%
BBD - INTR
71%
Closely correlated
+1.74%
BSBR - INTR
70%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
ITUB - INTR
67%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
NU - INTR
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
BSAC - INTR
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
More