INTR
Price
$5.28
Change
-$0.18 (-3.30%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.41B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NU
Price
$14.09
Change
-$0.10 (-0.70%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
70.09B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

INTR vs NU

INTR vs NU Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INTR vs. NU commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INTR is a Hold and NU is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (INTR: $5.46 vs. NU: $14.19)
Brand notoriety: INTR and NU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INTR: 44% vs. NU: 225%
Market capitalization -- INTR: $2.41B vs. NU: $70.09B
INTR [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.41B. NU’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $70.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INTR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • INTR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, INTR is a better buy in the long-term than NU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INTR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NU’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INTR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NU is a better buy in the short-term than INTR.

Price Growth

INTR (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.44% price change this week, while NU (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

INTR is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

NU is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.54% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NU($70.1B) has a higher market cap than INTR($2.41B). NU has higher P/E ratio than INTR: NU (21.89) vs INTR (8.68). NU YTD gains are higher at: -15.233 vs. INTR (-34.797). NU has less debt than INTR: NU (1.92B) vs INTR (15.8B). NU has higher revenues than INTR: NU (11.9B) vs INTR (9B).
INTRNUINTR / NU
Capitalization2.41B70.1B3%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-34.797-15.233228%
P/E Ratio8.6821.8940%
Revenue9B11.9B76%
Total CashN/A1.21B-
Total Debt15.8B1.92B824%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INTRNU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
INTR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PIT75.521.06
+1.42%
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
GMMA21.58N/A
N/A
GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF
MATE30.45N/A
N/A
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
VEMY28.49-0.15
-0.53%
Virtus Stone Harbor Emr Mkt Hi Yld BdETF
EWP59.02-1.11
-1.85%
iShares MSCI Spain ETF

INTR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTR has been closely correlated with BBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INTR jumps, then BBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INTR
1D Price
Change %
INTR100%
-4.04%
BBD - INTR
71%
Closely correlated
-1.88%
BSBR - INTR
69%
Closely correlated
-1.65%
ITUB - INTR
67%
Closely correlated
-1.53%
NU - INTR
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.21%
BBDO - INTR
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
More

NU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NU has been loosely correlated with BBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NU jumps, then BBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NU
1D Price
Change %
NU100%
-2.21%
BBD - NU
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
BSBR - NU
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.65%
INTR - NU
59%
Loosely correlated
-4.04%
ITUB - NU
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.53%
BSAC - NU
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
More