BBD
Price
$4.19
Change
-$0.09 (-2.10%)
Updated
Oct 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
33.93B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
INTR
Price
$7.45
Change
-$0.29 (-3.75%)
Updated
Oct 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.23B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBD vs INTR

BBD vs INTR Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 06, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Banco Bradesco (BBD) vs. Inter & Co. (INTR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • BBD is Brazil's second-largest private bank and its largest insurer, a large-cap incumbent with a market capitalization around $45 billion.
  • INTR is a digital bank and "super app" fintech with a market capitalization near $2.9 billion, representing a much smaller and faster-growing profile.
  • Both stocks rallied sharply in recent weeks on renewed optimism around Brazil's presidential election and the country's long-term interest-rate outlook.
  • BBD offers a materially lower beta and a meaningful dividend yield, while INTR carries higher volatility and a higher-growth, digital-first business model.
  • BBD trades near its 52-week high, whereas INTR remains well below its own 52-week peak despite the recent rebound.

Introduction

Both BBD and INTR give U.S.-listed investors exposure to Brazil's financial sector, yet they represent two very different approaches to banking. Banco Bradesco is a traditional, diversified lender with decades of history, while Inter & Co. is a digital-first challenger built around a mobile platform. This stock comparison is relevant for investors weighing stability and income against growth and disruption, and for traders tracking how the same macroeconomic catalysts can move two financial names with very different risk profiles. Understanding their relative performance and market positioning helps clarify which business model is resonating with current sentiment.

BBD Overview and Recent Performance

BBD is the American Depositary Receipt (ADR, a U.S.-traded certificate representing foreign shares) of Banco Bradesco S.A., one of Brazil's largest private-sector banks. The company operates across banking, insurance, asset management, and card services, giving it a diversified earnings base that extends well beyond lending. It remains a dividend-paying name with a yield in the mid-single digits, supported by a low five-year beta near 0.2, meaning its price has historically moved far less than the broader market.

In recent weeks, BBD has strengthened notably, with its shares climbing toward the upper end of their 52-week range. The move has coincided with renewed investor enthusiasm following Brazil's presidential election news, which triggered broad gains across U.S.-listed Brazilian financial stocks. Supporting sentiment, several company insiders have disclosed share purchases in recent weeks, and at least one major sell-side firm upgraded its view on the bank, citing an improving return on equity (ROE, a measure of profitability relative to shareholders' capital) and a more favorable cost of capital. These factors have reinforced a narrative of a gradual recovery in credit quality and margins.

INTR Overview and Recent Performance

INTR is Inter & Co., Inc., a digital bank headquartered in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. The company serves clients primarily through a mobile "super app" spanning banking and spending, investments, insurance brokerage, and a marketplace, and it has also expanded into the U.S. market, including a recently opened Miami branch. Its revenue growth has been robust, with quarterly revenue advancing at a double-digit pace year over year in recent reporting periods.

In recent market activity, INTR has rebounded sharply from the lower end of its 52-week range, participating in the same election-driven rally that lifted Brazilian financial shares. Even so, the stock remains considerably below its prior-year peak, reflecting a higher beta near 0.95 and a smaller, more growth-sensitive capital base. Investors weighing INTR are effectively balancing its stronger top-line expansion and digital-first positioning against greater price volatility and a less diversified, earlier-stage business than a traditional banking incumbent.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across varied strategies, timeframes, and risk profiles. Because market conditions change, not every bot is equally well suited to the current environment. The Trending AI Robots page curates only those bots whose recent performance and statistics place them among the most suitable for present conditions. These bots differ meaningfully in trading style, holding period, win rate, and the set of securities they cover, which helps traders match an approach to their own objectives. Explore the Trending AI Robots section to review the currently featured selections.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The core contrast between these two names is scale versus growth. BBD brings a diversified, established business with meaningful insurance and asset-management revenue, a comparatively low beta, and a steady dividend. INTR offers a pure-play digital banking model with faster revenue growth but higher volatility, a smaller market capitalization, and greater sensitivity to shifts in Brazilian risk appetite and interest rates.

In terms of recent momentum, both stocks have been carried upward by the same political and macro catalyst, yet their relative positioning differs sharply. BBD sits near the top of its 52-week range, while INTR is recovering from a much deeper drawdown and remains below its high. On valuation, both trade at single-digit forward price-to-earnings (P/E) multiples, though INTR's faster earnings growth tends to compress its multiple. The key trade-off is stability and income on one side versus growth potential and volatility on the other.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward BBD in the current environment. Its lower beta, more diversified revenue base, dividend support, insider buying activity, and position near its 52-week high point to more consistent trend strength and stability. INTR presents a credible growth story and has shown an encouraging rebound, but its higher volatility and still-depressed price relative to its prior peak suggest a less firmly established trend. The verdict is probabilistic rather than definitive, and both names remain exposed to Brazil's evolving political and interest-rate backdrop.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BBD vs. INTR commentary
Oct 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBD is a Buy and INTR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBD: Fundamental Ratings
BBD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
24
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
42
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBDINTR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 14, 2026
Stock price -- (BBD: $4.28 vs. INTR: $7.74)
Brand notoriety: BBD: Notable vs. INTR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBD: 75% vs. INTR: 82%
Market capitalization -- BBD: $33.93B vs. INTR: $2.23B
BBD [@Regional Banks] is valued at $33.93B. INTR’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while INTR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BBD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • INTR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BBD is a better buy in the long-term than INTR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INTR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • INTR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BBD is a better buy in the short-term than INTR.

Price Growth

BBD (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.15% price change this week, while INTR (@Regional Banks) price change was +17.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

BBD is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

INTR is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
BBD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
INTR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EWH22.350.39
+1.78%
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH)
JELH25.730.07
+0.27%
Janus Henderson Equity Linked High Income ETF (JELH)
SRV44.480.06
+0.14%
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
DVXP24.45N/A
N/A
Webs Defined Volatility Xlp ETF
ALTL42.95-0.18
-0.42%
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL)

BBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBD has been closely correlated with BBDO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBD jumps, then BBDO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBD
1D Price
Change %
BBD100%
-2.10%
BBDO - BBD
74%
Closely correlated
-2.79%
BSBR - BBD
72%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
INTR - BBD
70%
Closely correlated
-3.75%
NU - BBD
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
BSAC - BBD
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
More

INTR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTR has been closely correlated with BBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INTR jumps, then BBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INTR
1D Price
Change %
INTR100%
-3.75%
BBD - INTR
70%
Closely correlated
-2.10%
ITUB - INTR
67%
Closely correlated
-1.69%
NU - INTR
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
BSBR - INTR
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
BSAC - INTR
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
More