BN
Price
$64.30
Change
+$1.67 (+2.67%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
62.67B
33 days until earnings call
PGPHF
Price
$1330.83
Change
+$51.38 (+4.02%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
29.13B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BN vs PGPHF

Header iconBN vs PGPHF Comparison
Open Charts BN vs PGPHFBanner chart's image
Brookfield
Price$64.30
Change+$1.67 (+2.67%)
Volume$1.73M
Capitalization62.67B
Partners Group Holding Zug Namen-Akt
Price$1330.83
Change+$51.38 (+4.02%)
Volume$2
Capitalization29.13B
BN vs PGPHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BN vs. PGPHF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BN is a StrongBuy and PGPHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BN: $64.30 vs. PGPHF: $1330.83)
Brand notoriety: BN and PGPHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BN: 95% vs. PGPHF: 3%
Market capitalization -- BN: $62.67B vs. PGPHF: $29.13B
BN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $62.67B. PGPHF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $29.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePGPHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PGPHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the long-term than PGPHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGPHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PGPHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the short-term than PGPHF.

Price Growth

BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +5.24% price change this week, while PGPHF (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

PGPHF is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($62.7B) has a higher market cap than PGPHF($29.1B). BN has higher P/E ratio than PGPHF: BN (67.52) vs PGPHF (25.71). BN YTD gains are higher at: 12.301 vs. PGPHF (0.420). BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.7B vs. PGPHF (1.57B). BN has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. PGPHF (307M). PGPHF has less debt than BN: PGPHF (1.13B) vs BN (234B). BN has higher revenues than PGPHF: BN (95.9B) vs PGPHF (2.33B).
BNPGPHFBN / PGPHF
Capitalization62.7B29.1B215%
EBITDA30.7B1.57B1,953%
Gain YTD12.3010.4202,927%
P/E Ratio67.5225.71263%
Revenue95.9B2.33B4,109%
Total Cash16.9B307M5,505%
Total Debt234B1.13B20,690%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BN vs PGPHF: Fundamental Ratings
BN
PGPHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2366
SMR RATING
1..100
8823
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4156
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
479
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PGPHF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as BN (51) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that PGPHF’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGPHF (66) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

PGPHF's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BN (88) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that PGPHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as PGPHF (56) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to PGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

BN's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for PGPHF (79) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew significantly faster than PGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNPGPHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HFGO24.940.28
+1.16%
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF
IYZ29.870.24
+0.79%
iShares US Telecommunications ETF
IDV34.880.12
+0.35%
iShares International Select Div ETF
NTSE33.480.06
+0.19%
WisdomTree Emerging Mkts Effcnt Cr ETF
LFAN140.06N/A
N/A
LifeX 2054 Longevity Income ETF

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
+2.67%
BAM - BN
85%
Closely correlated
+2.29%
BX - BN
82%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
KKR - BN
81%
Closely correlated
+3.03%
JHG - BN
81%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
IVZ - BN
80%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
More

PGPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGPHF and BRDG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGPHF and BRDG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGPHF
1D Price
Change %
PGPHF100%
+4.02%
BRDG - PGPHF
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
BLK - PGPHF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
BN - PGPHF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.67%
BAM - PGPHF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.29%
IVZ - PGPHF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
More