BN
Price
$58.18
Change
+$0.60 (+1.04%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
62.67B
24 days until earnings call
PGPHF
Price
$1427.74
Change
-$21.26 (-1.47%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
29.13B
Ad is loading...

BN vs PGPHF

Header iconBN vs PGPHF Comparison
Open Charts BN vs PGPHFBanner chart's image
Brookfield
Price$58.18
Change+$0.60 (+1.04%)
Volume$1.41M
Capitalization62.67B
Partners Group Holding Zug Namen-Akt
Price$1427.74
Change-$21.26 (-1.47%)
Volume$17
Capitalization29.13B
BN vs PGPHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BN vs. PGPHF commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BN is a Hold and PGPHF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BN: $58.18 vs. PGPHF: $1427.74)
Brand notoriety: BN and PGPHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BN: 66% vs. PGPHF: 63%
Market capitalization -- BN: $62.67B vs. PGPHF: $29.13B
BN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $62.67B. PGPHF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $29.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePGPHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PGPHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the long-term than PGPHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGPHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PGPHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PGPHF is a better buy in the short-term than BN.

Price Growth

BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +5.96% price change this week, while PGPHF (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.49% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($62.7B) has a higher market cap than PGPHF($29.1B). BN has higher P/E ratio than PGPHF: BN (67.52) vs PGPHF (25.71). PGPHF YTD gains are higher at: 7.733 vs. BN (1.271). BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.7B vs. PGPHF (1.57B). BN has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. PGPHF (307M). PGPHF has less debt than BN: PGPHF (1.13B) vs BN (234B). BN has higher revenues than PGPHF: BN (95.9B) vs PGPHF (2.33B).
BNPGPHFBN / PGPHF
Capitalization62.7B29.1B215%
EBITDA30.7B1.57B1,953%
Gain YTD1.2717.73316%
P/E Ratio67.5225.71263%
Revenue95.9B2.33B4,109%
Total Cash16.9B307M5,505%
Total Debt234B1.13B20,690%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BN vs PGPHF: Fundamental Ratings
BN
PGPHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2256
SMR RATING
1..100
8817
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4252
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1134
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BN's Valuation (72) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as PGPHF (91) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to PGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGPHF (56) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

PGPHF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BN (88) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that PGPHF’s stock grew significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as PGPHF (52) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to PGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

BN's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as PGPHF (34) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to PGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNPGPHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGABX68.640.77
+1.13%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
EVSIX24.310.24
+1.00%
Allspring Disciplined US Core Inst
PHLOX10.880.05
+0.46%
Philotimo Focused Growth and Income
FRCSX61.770.16
+0.26%
Franklin Small Cap Value R6
GMAYX24.500.03
+0.12%
GMO Small Cap Quality I

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
+1.04%
BAM - BN
80%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
BX - BN
72%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
JHG - BN
69%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
APAM - BN
67%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
TROW - BN
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
More

PGPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGPHF and BRDG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGPHF and BRDG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGPHF
1D Price
Change %
PGPHF100%
-1.47%
BRDG - PGPHF
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
BLK - PGPHF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
BN - PGPHF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
BAM - PGPHF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
IVZ - PGPHF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
More