BNT vs LMND
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNT is a Hold and LMND is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BNT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLMND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BNT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LMND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BNT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMND’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BNT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LMND’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BNT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -4.47% price change this week, while LMND (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.12%.
Reported Earning Dates
BNT is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
LMND is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-2.49% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| BNT | LMND | BNT / LMND | |
| Capitalization | 5.01B | 1.16B | 430% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.956 | 157.533 | 25% |
| P/E Ratio | 3.91 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 6.94B | 430M | 1,613% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 938M | - |
| Total Debt | 2.91B | 43.1M | 6,745% |
| BNT | LMND | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 5 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 87% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSFP | 31.13 | 0.25 | +0.81% |
| Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF | |||
| RVNU | 25.30 | 0.13 | +0.51% |
| Xtrackers Municipal Infras Rev Bd ETF | |||
| LQDH | 92.58 | 0.22 | +0.23% |
| iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corp Bd ETF | |||
| UITB | 45.98 | 0.08 | +0.17% |
| VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF | |||
| UPV | 54.88 | -0.25 | -0.46% |
| ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe | |||
BNT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNT has been loosely correlated with GLRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNT jumps, then GLRE could also see price increases.
LMND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMND has been loosely correlated with QUCOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMND jumps, then QUCOF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LMND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMND | 100% | +9.03% | ||
| QUCOF - LMND | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SAFT - LMND | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| ROOT - LMND | 38% Loosely correlated | +2.78% | ||
| UFCS - LMND | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| KMPR - LMND | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.36% | ||
More | ||||