BON
Price
$1.11
Change
-$0.03 (-2.63%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
9.03M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CC
Price
$15.03
Change
-$0.04 (-0.27%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
2.26B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BON vs CC

BON vs CC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BON vs. CC commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BON is a Hold and CC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CC($2.26B) has a higher market cap than BON($9.03M). CC has higher P/E ratio than BON: CC (70.17) vs BON (0.08). CC YTD gains are higher at: 29.322 vs. BON (-30.189). CC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 542M vs. BON (2.3M). CC has more cash in the bank: 671M vs. BON (80.5K). BON has less debt than CC: BON (7.3M) vs CC (4.12B). CC has higher revenues than BON: CC (5.8B) vs BON (23.8M).
BONCCBON / CC
Capitalization9.03M2.26B0%
EBITDA2.3M542M0%
Gain YTD-30.18929.322-103%
P/E Ratio0.0870.170%
Revenue23.8M5.8B0%
Total Cash80.5K671M0%
Total Debt7.3M4.12B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CC: Fundamental Ratings
CC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
78
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
15

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BONCC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 13, 2026
Stock price -- (BON: $1.11 vs. CC: $15.03)
Brand notoriety: BON: Not notable vs. CC: Notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BON: 41% vs. CC: 50%
Market capitalization -- BON: $9.03M vs. CC: $2.26B
BON [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $9.03M. CC’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $2.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $47 to $214.92B. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $11.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BON’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while CC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BON’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BON and CC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BON’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BON’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CC is a better buy in the short-term than BON.

Price Growth

BON (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -1.77% price change this week, while CC (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -1.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

CC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-1.79% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

View a ticker or compare two or three
BON
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SAA34.280.34
+1.02%
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
MFSG29.960.29
+0.98%
MFS Active Growth ETF
INDS38.700.25
+0.66%
Pacer Benchmark Industrial RE SCTR ETF
GPZ23.110.04
+0.17%
Vaneck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
CLM6.580.01
+0.15%
Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund

BON and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BON and FEAM have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BON and FEAM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BON
1D Price
Change %
BON100%
-2.63%
FEAM - BON
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.00%
CC - BON
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
NATR - BON
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
LWLG - BON
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
DD - BON
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
More

CC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CC has been closely correlated with TROX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CC jumps, then TROX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CC
1D Price
Change %
CC100%
-0.27%
TROX - CC
70%
Closely correlated
-3.70%
OLN - CC
70%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
HUN - CC
66%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
DOW - CC
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.06%
ASIX - CC
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
More