BOTZ
Price
$37.98
Change
-$2.10 (-5.24%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
3.75B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IYW
Price
$241.25
Change
-$15.17 (-5.92%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
25.46B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOTZ vs IYW

Header iconBOTZ vs IYW Comparison
Open Charts BOTZ vs IYWBanner chart's image
BOTZ vs IYW Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) vs. iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW)

Key Takeaways

  • BOTZ offers targeted thematic exposure to global robotics and AI companies across industrials (45%) and technology (35%), while IYW provides broad U.S. technology sector coverage dominated by megacap semiconductors and software.
  • IYW features lower expense ratio (0.38% vs. BOTZ's 0.68%) and superior liquidity with higher average daily volume and larger AUM (over $24 billion vs. $3.8 billion).
  • BOTZ holds 62 stocks with top holdings like Keyence, ABB, and NVDA (non-U.S. heavy), contrasting IYW's 139 holdings led by NVDA (16%), AAPL (13%), and Alphabet.
  • BOTZ exhibits higher volatility (beta 1.54 vs. S&P 500) due to thematic concentration, while IYW offers more diversified tech exposure with slightly lower risk (beta 1.36).
  • Both benefit from AI momentum, but IYW's market-cap weighting captures broader tech leaders, potentially reducing single-theme risk.
  • Structural differences position BOTZ for pure-play AI/robotics growth and IYW for established U.S. tech stability.

Introduction

In the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence and automation, investors seek ETFs that capture technological innovation without excessive risk. BOTZ and IYW represent complementary strategies: BOTZ targets niche robotics and AI adopters globally, while IYW delivers comprehensive U.S. technology sector exposure. Though not direct competitors, they appeal to similar goals—tapping AI-driven growth amid sector rotation toward tech amid easing interest rates (anticipated Federal Reserve policy shifts) and surging demand for semiconductors and automation. This ETF comparison highlights structural differences, exposure profiles, and relative positioning to aid informed allocation in today's market environment.

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) Overview

The Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) is a passive, thematic ETF launched in 2016 by Global X (Mirae Asset). It tracks the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, investing at least 80% of assets in companies benefiting from robotics and AI adoption, including industrial automation, non-industrial robots, and autonomous vehicles.

Key structural traits include 62 holdings, with top 10 comprising ~58%: Keyence Corp. (9.4%), ABB Ltd. (8.8%), Fanuc Corp. (8.5%), NVDA (8.4%), Intuitive Surgical Inc. (ISRG, 5.9%). Sector allocation: industrials (44.8%), information technology (34.5%), health care (9.6%). Expense ratio is 0.68%, AUM ~$3.8 billion. Non-diversified with global developed-market focus; rebalanced periodically by index provider. Tight 30-day median bid-ask spread (0.03%) supports liquidity.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) Overview

The iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW), managed by BlackRock's iShares since 2000, passively tracks the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index. This benchmark measures U.S. equity market technology performance, capping single stocks at 22.5% and issuers at 45% for diversification.

It holds 139 stocks, top 10 ~64%: NVDA (16%), AAPL (13.5%), Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL, 7.5%), Class C (GOOG, 6%), MSFT (4%). Primarily information technology (~90%), with minor communication services and industrials. Expense ratio 0.38%, AUM over $24 billion. Quarterly rebalancing/reconstitution annually; high liquidity via 30-day avg. volume ~1.1 million shares, bid-ask spread 0.02%.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector, propelled by AI infrastructure buildout, faces a transformative 2026 with projected $700 billion+ in data center spending. Robotics and AI catalysts include automation demand in manufacturing/healthcare, fueled by labor shortages and efficiency gains; macro drivers like productivity boosts from larger AI models support earnings. Capital flows favor semiconductors/cloud amid hyperscaler capex. Risks encompass regulatory scrutiny on AI ethics/data privacy, supply chain disruptions (e.g., chips), and elevated valuations vulnerable to rate hikes. Geopolitical tensions could impact global robotics supply, while U.S.-centric tech benefits from domestic innovation hubs. Sector rotation persists toward AI enablers amid moderating inflation.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent months, IYW has demonstrated stronger relative positioning, capturing broad tech momentum with YTD returns around 19% and 1-year ~61%, driven by megacap leaders like NVDA and AAPL amid AI chip demand and cloud earnings cycles. BOTZ, with ~14% YTD and 41% 1-year, trails slightly due to thematic volatility from non-U.S. industrials exposure but aligns with robotics upcycles.

BOTZ's higher beta (1.54 vs. S&P 500; std. dev. 22.4%) reflects concentration risks versus IYW's 1.36 beta (std. dev. 21.1%), linking to interest rate sensitivity—easing policy favors growth. BOTZ benefits from sector rotation into automation amid commodity stabilization; IYW leverages U.S. tech resilience. Volatility differences highlight BOTZ's cyclicality versus IYW's stability.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (total market value of outstanding shares), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in tech and beyond.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors IYW with moderate conviction (~65% probability of outperformance over coming months). This stems from its cost efficiency, superior diversification (139 holdings), massive scale enhancing liquidity, consistent trend alignment with U.S. tech momentum, and balanced risk via capping. BOTZ suits high-conviction thematic bets but trails on volatility and fees amid broader sector strength.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BOTZ vs. IYW commentary
Jun 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOTZ is a Hold and IYW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYW has more net assets: 25.5B vs. BOTZ (3.75B). IYW has a higher annual dividend yield than BOTZ: IYW (20.863) vs BOTZ (4.830). BOTZ was incepted earlier than IYW: BOTZ (10 years) vs IYW (26 years). IYW (0.38) has a lower expense ratio than BOTZ (0.68). BOTZ has a higher turnover IYW (7.00) vs IYW (7.00).
BOTZIYWBOTZ / IYW
Gain YTD4.83020.86323%
Net Assets3.75B25.5B15%
Total Expense Ratio0.680.38179%
Turnover12.117.00173%
Yield0.590.11552%
Fund Existence10 years26 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOTZIYW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOTZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IYW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LDRC25.12N/A
-0.02%
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF
PSMR31.92-0.22
-0.69%
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF
DFEB50.14-0.42
-0.83%
FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Feb
DEM53.74-1.88
-3.38%
WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Div ETF
ASGM31.22-1.34
-4.11%
Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF

IYW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYW has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYW jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IYW
1D Price
Change %
IYW100%
-5.92%
NVDA - IYW
75%
Closely correlated
-6.20%
LRCX - IYW
69%
Closely correlated
-9.85%
AVGO - IYW
65%
Loosely correlated
-7.92%
MKSI - IYW
65%
Loosely correlated
-8.65%
AMD - IYW
64%
Loosely correlated
-10.86%
More