BOW
Price
$31.57
Change
+$0.18 (+0.57%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.04B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HIG
Price
$140.78
Change
+$2.00 (+1.44%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
38.59B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOW vs HIG

BOW vs HIG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOW vs. HIG commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOW is a Buy and HIG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (BOW: $31.57 vs. HIG: $140.78)
Brand notoriety: BOW and HIG are both not notable
BOW represents the Property/Casualty Insurance, while HIG is part of the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOW: 90% vs. HIG: 79%
Market capitalization -- BOW: $1.04B vs. HIG: $38.59B
BOW [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $1.04B. HIG’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $38.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $137.59B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.02B. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $19.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHIG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BOW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HIG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HIG is a better buy in the long-term than BOW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BOW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BOW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HIG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HIG is a better buy in the short-term than BOW.

Price Growth

BOW (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.13% price change this week, while HIG (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +2.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.08%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

HIG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.53% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

@Multi-Line Insurance (-1.10% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HIG($38.6B) has a higher market cap than BOW($1.04B). BOW has higher P/E ratio than HIG: BOW (18.25) vs HIG (9.91). BOW YTD gains are higher at: 10.617 vs. HIG (3.086). HIG has more cash in the bank: 21.8B vs. BOW (893M). BOW has less debt than HIG: BOW (147M) vs HIG (4.37B). HIG has higher revenues than BOW: HIG (28.5B) vs BOW (584M).
BOWHIGBOW / HIG
Capitalization1.04B38.6B3%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.6173.086344%
P/E Ratio18.259.91184%
Revenue584M28.5B2%
Total Cash893M21.8B4%
Total Debt147M4.37B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HIG: Fundamental Ratings
HIG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
26
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2
SMR RATING
1..100
50
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
33
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOWHIG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HIG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HNCRX24.01N/A
N/A
Hartford International Growth R3
SWPPX19.53N/A
N/A
Schwab® S&P 500 Index
WESCX31.86N/A
N/A
Keeley Small Cap Fund AAA
SHTCX71.38N/A
N/A
Columbia Seligman Global Tech C
PKAPX16.88N/A
N/A
PIMCO RAE US I-2

BOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOW has been loosely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOW jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOW
1D Price
Change %
BOW100%
+0.57%
CNA - BOW
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
HIG - BOW
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
THG - BOW
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
RLI - BOW
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
PLMR - BOW
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.58%
More