Advertisement
BPYPO vs CWK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPYPO is a Hold and CWK is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BPYPO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCWK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BPYPO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CWK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BPYPO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CWK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BPYPO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- CWK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BPYPO (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +0.39% price change this week, while CWK (@Real Estate Development) price change was +2.92% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.16%.
Reported Earning Dates
CWK is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Development (+0.19% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| BPYPO | CWK | BPYPO / CWK | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 3.48B | - |
| EBITDA | 3.74B | 502M | 746% |
| Gain YTD | 14.017 | -8.462 | -166% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 51.10 | - |
| Revenue | 7.08B | 10.5B | 67% |
| Total Cash | 2.07B | 601M | 345% |
| Total Debt | 52.6B | 3.12B | 1,686% |
BPYPO | CWK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 1 Undervalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BPYPO's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CWK (87) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that BPYPO’s stock grew significantly faster than CWK’s over the last 12 months.
BPYPO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CWK (100) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that BPYPO’s stock grew similarly to CWK’s over the last 12 months.
CWK's SMR Rating (85) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as BPYPO (100) in the null industry. This means that CWK’s stock grew similarly to BPYPO’s over the last 12 months.
CWK's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as BPYPO (50) in the null industry. This means that CWK’s stock grew similarly to BPYPO’s over the last 12 months.
CWK's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for BPYPO (100) in the null industry. This means that CWK’s stock grew significantly faster than BPYPO’s over the last 12 months.
| BPYPO | CWK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 44% | 10 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 18 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TSLG | 4.86 | 0.44 | +9.95% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF | |||
| COMB | 27.53 | 0.18 | +0.66% |
| GraniteShares Blmbrg CmdtyBrdStr NoK1ETF | |||
| TSPA | 48.23 | 0.22 | +0.46% |
| T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF | |||
| IBMO | 25.64 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bd ETF | |||
| PMSE | 26.55 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September | |||
BPYPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BPYPO and DBRG have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPYPO and DBRG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BPYPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPYPO | 100% | +1.05% | ||
| DBRG - BPYPO | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.13% | ||
| RMAX - BPYPO | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.88% | ||
| FRPH - BPYPO | 21% Poorly correlated | +3.37% | ||
| CWK - BPYPO | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.82% | ||
| NMRK - BPYPO | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.44% | ||
More | ||||