BPZZF
Price
$14.38
Change
+$0.18 (+1.27%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
304.97M
SBUX
Price
$92.04
Change
+$1.02 (+1.12%)
Updated
Aug 8, 04:53 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
103.46B
83 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPZZF vs SBUX

Header iconBPZZF vs SBUX Comparison
Open Charts BPZZF vs SBUXBanner chart's image
Boston Pizza Royalties Income Fund
Price$14.38
Change+$0.18 (+1.27%)
Volume$412
Capitalization304.97M
Starbucks
Price$92.04
Change+$1.02 (+1.12%)
Volume$32.3K
Capitalization103.46B
BPZZF vs SBUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPZZF vs. SBUX commentary
Aug 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPZZF is a StrongBuy and SBUX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 09, 2025
Stock price -- (BPZZF: $14.38 vs. SBUX: $91.02)
Brand notoriety: BPZZF: Not notable vs. SBUX: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPZZF: 49% vs. SBUX: 101%
Market capitalization -- BPZZF: $304.97M vs. SBUX: $103.46B
BPZZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $304.97M. SBUX’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $103.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $219.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPZZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSBUX’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BPZZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SBUX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the long-term than SBUX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPZZF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBUX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPZZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SBUX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the short-term than SBUX.

Price Growth

BPZZF (@Restaurants) experienced а +2.63% price change this week, while SBUX (@Restaurants) price change was +2.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBUX is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.70% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBUX($103B) has a higher market cap than BPZZF($305M). SBUX has higher P/E ratio than BPZZF: SBUX (38.52) vs BPZZF (14.78). BPZZF YTD gains are higher at: 16.610 vs. SBUX (0.995). SBUX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.79B vs. BPZZF (49.3M). SBUX has more cash in the bank: 4.51B vs. BPZZF (4.58M). BPZZF has less debt than SBUX: BPZZF (86.6M) vs SBUX (27.9B). SBUX has higher revenues than BPZZF: SBUX (36.7B) vs BPZZF (50M).
BPZZFSBUXBPZZF / SBUX
Capitalization305M103B0%
EBITDA49.3M5.79B1%
Gain YTD16.6100.9951,669%
P/E Ratio14.7838.5238%
Revenue50M36.7B0%
Total Cash4.58M4.51B0%
Total Debt86.6M27.9B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPZZF vs SBUX: Fundamental Ratings
BPZZF
SBUX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9152
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1362
SMR RATING
1..100
7010
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3511
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPZZF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as SBUX (32) in the Restaurants industry. This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to SBUX’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBUX (62) in the Restaurants industry. This means that BPZZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBUX’s over the last 12 months.

SBUX's SMR Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPZZF (70) in the null industry. This means that SBUX’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as SBUX (58) in the Restaurants industry. This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to SBUX’s over the last 12 months.

SBUX's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BPZZF (35) in the null industry. This means that SBUX’s stock grew similarly to BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPZZFSBUX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSKH52.550.79
+1.53%
GSK PLC ADRHEDGED GSKH
PIM3.340.02
+0.60%
Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust
FLOT50.910.01
+0.02%
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
SCDL37.68N/A
N/A
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Div Fctr TR ETN
LGOV21.49-0.02
-0.12%
First Trust Long Duration Opp ETF

BPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPZZF has been loosely correlated with SBUX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPZZF jumps, then SBUX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPZZF
1D Price
Change %
BPZZF100%
+1.25%
SBUX - BPZZF
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
LOCO - BPZZF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
JACK - BPZZF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
DENN - BPZZF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
PZRIF - BPZZF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SBUX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBUX has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBUX jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBUX
1D Price
Change %
SBUX100%
+2.28%
FRSH - SBUX
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.78%
YUM - SBUX
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
KRUS - SBUX
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.53%
RICK - SBUX
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
EAT - SBUX
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
More