Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BST vs SMH
BST vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts BST vs SMH
BST vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BST vs. SMH commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BST is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 73.4B vs. BST (1.79B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than BST: SMH (71.860) vs BST (21.458). BST was incepted earlier than SMH: BST (12 years) vs SMH (15 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than BST (0.88). BST has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| BST | SMH | BST / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 21.458 | 71.860 | 30% |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 73.4B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.35 | 251% |
| Turnover | 40.00 | 12.00 | 333% |
| Yield | 0.01 | 0.18 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BST | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CPAG | 102.87 | 0.56 | +0.55% |
| F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | |||
| DIHP | 33.56 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Dimensional International High Pbly ETF | |||
| PIPE | 29.67 | -0.32 | -1.06% |
| Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | |||
| DJP | 43.16 | -0.91 | -2.06% |
| iPath® Bloomberg Cmdty TR ETN | |||
| DGP | 128.29 | -9.25 | -6.73% |
| DB Gold Double Long ETN | |||
BST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BST has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BST jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BST | 100% | -1.90% | ||
| NVDA - BST | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| AVGO - BST | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| AMD - BST | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| ASML - BST | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| MRVL - BST | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.84% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -0.50% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 80% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
More | ||||