Autodesk, Inc. and Bentley Systems, Incorporated both sell software that helps professionals design, build, and operate physical assets, yet they target different corners of that market. This stock comparison is most relevant for investors and traders evaluating two software companies whose growth narratives, valuations, and recent price behavior have diverged despite operating in adjacent industries. Understanding the contrast in their business models, momentum, and risk factors can help clarify where each name sits in the current market landscape. This article examines recent performance, key developments, and relative positioning to support a balanced, fact-based assessment of the two stocks.
Autodesk, Inc., best known for pioneering computer-aided design (CAD) with its AutoCAD product, provides design and engineering software across architecture, engineering, construction, manufacturing, and media and entertainment. In its most recent quarter, ADSK reported revenue of approximately $2.05 billion, up about 16% year over year, with adjusted earnings per share (EPS, or profit allocated to each share) coming in above analyst consensus. Annual recurring revenue (ARR, the annualized value of subscription contracts) grew to roughly $7.54 billion.
Recent market activity has been characterized by a rising stock price over the past year, supported by strength in construction and manufacturing platforms, including the Fusion design-and-make offering, and the integration of the MaintainX acquisition to extend into asset operations. Analysts have generally maintained a favorable consensus, though sentiment has been tempered by near-term transitional headwinds tied to a new transaction model and a large cohort of enterprise renewals. The stock remains well below its 52-week high but has posted a positive year-to-date return.
Bentley Systems, Incorporated provides infrastructure engineering software used to design, construct, and operate roads, bridges, rail, water systems, utilities, and industrial facilities, with a particular focus on "digital twin" technology that creates virtual replicas of physical assets. In its latest reported quarter, BSY generated revenue of about $410.7 million, up roughly 12.8% year over year, with ARR near $1.54 billion and a net revenue retention rate of approximately 109%.
Despite steady recurring-revenue growth and a modest dividend, BSY has underperformed the broader market over the past year and has declined year to date, trading well below its 52-week high. Recent developments include new analyst coverage and ratings, the promotion of a new chief revenue officer, and continued shareholder buybacks. The company's heavier short interest and elevated valuation multiple relative to earnings have contributed to a more mixed near-term sentiment profile.
For traders seeking a data-driven edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of automated trading systems. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, yet only the most suitable for current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. These bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance statistics, and sets of tickers, giving users the ability to compare historical results and risk metrics across many approaches. Because each bot operates differently, the section helps surface those currently demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market dynamics. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to review the latest featured systems.
The clearest contrast between ADSK and BSY is scope. Autodesk's diversified exposure across construction, manufacturing, and media gives it broader demand drivers and a much larger revenue base, while Bentley's concentration in infrastructure engineering offers a more specialized franchise with a strong foothold among owner-operators and engineering firms. On growth, ADSK has recently outgrown BSY, though both sustain double-digit revenue expansion.
Relative performance also differs. ADSK has climbed over the past year and is positive year to date, whereas BSY has fallen significantly over the same period. From a valuation standpoint, BSY carries a higher price-to-earnings multiple and higher short interest as a percentage of its public float, reflecting greater investor skepticism, while ADSK trades at a comparatively lower earnings multiple on a larger, more established base. Risk factors include ADSK's ongoing go-to-market transition and BSY's narrower end-market exposure and debt levels.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, revenue momentum, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would currently lean toward ADSK. The stock's positive year-to-date return, faster recent top-line growth, broader diversification, and comparatively favorable earnings multiple suggest a steadier and more constructive setup than BSY, whose underperformance, elevated short interest, and narrower market exposure introduce additional uncertainty. That said, this assessment reflects probabilistic, data-driven reasoning rather than a definitive prediction, and either stock could deviate from current trends as new catalysts emerge.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
ADSK | BSY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BSY's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ADSK (75) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that BSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
BSY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ADSK (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that BSY’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
ADSK's SMR Rating (20) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as BSY (39) in the null industry. This means that ADSK’s stock grew similarly to BSY’s over the last 12 months.
BSY's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as ADSK (62) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that BSY’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
BSY's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as ADSK (96) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that BSY’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
| ADSK | BSY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 6 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 67% | 8 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 72% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ADSK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while BSY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ADSK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BSY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ADSK (@Packaged Software) experienced а +6.94% price change this week, while BSY (@Packaged Software) price change was +11.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.02%.
ADSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2026.
BSY is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADSK has been closely correlated with ADBE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ADSK jumps, then ADBE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADSK | 100% | +4.51% | ||
| ADBE - ADSK | 72% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| PTC - ADSK | 72% Closely correlated | +33.49% | ||
| BSY - ADSK | 71% Closely correlated | +7.82% | ||
| APPF - ADSK | 67% Closely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| GWRE - ADSK | 67% Closely correlated | +7.28% | ||
More | ||||