It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BTI’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIMBBY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BTI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IMBBY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BTI (@Tobacco) experienced а -0.16% price change this week, while IMBBY (@Tobacco) price change was +2.51% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tobacco industry was +3.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.94%.
BTI is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
IMBBY is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.
The industry is engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products like cigarettes. In 2017, tobacco companies spent an estimated $9.36 billion marketing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the U.S. – an amount that translates to more than $25 million each day (according to a CDC report). Philip Morris International Inc., Altria Group Inc., and British American Tobacco plc are some major cigar makers. In recent times, vaping or the use of e-cigarette (does not burn tobacco) is gaining momentum – several established cigarette makers are trying to expand their footprint in this new market.
BTI | IMBBY | BTI / IMBBY | |
Capitalization | 126B | 33.5B | 376% |
EBITDA | 8.63B | 4.29B | 201% |
Gain YTD | 62.802 | 34.469 | 182% |
P/E Ratio | 30.20 | 10.25 | 295% |
Revenue | 25.6B | 32B | 80% |
Total Cash | 4.89B | 599M | 817% |
Total Debt | 35.2B | 10.9B | 323% |
BTI | IMBBY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 40 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BTI's Valuation (8) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as IMBBY (9) in the null industry. This means that BTI’s stock grew similarly to IMBBY’s over the last 12 months.
IMBBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as BTI (8) in the Tobacco industry. This means that IMBBY’s stock grew similarly to BTI’s over the last 12 months.
IMBBY's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as BTI (100) in the Tobacco industry. This means that IMBBY’s stock grew similarly to BTI’s over the last 12 months.
BTI's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as IMBBY (43) in the null industry. This means that BTI’s stock grew similarly to IMBBY’s over the last 12 months.
BTI's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as IMBBY (40) in the null industry. This means that BTI’s stock grew similarly to IMBBY’s over the last 12 months.
BTI | IMBBY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago45% | 2 days ago44% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | 2 days ago40% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago60% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago58% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% | 2 days ago60% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 2 days ago59% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago59% | 4 days ago63% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago41% | 19 days ago44% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | 2 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FMF | 47.39 | 0.24 | +0.50% |
First Trust Managed Future Strategy ETF | |||
HYBI | 50.62 | 0.04 | +0.08% |
NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF | |||
PMAR | 43.20 | N/A | +0.01% |
Innovator U.S. Equity Power BffrETF™-Mar | |||
ESGV | 114.37 | -0.22 | -0.19% |
Vanguard ESG US Stock ETF | |||
BITS | 79.78 | -1.23 | -1.52% |
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Str ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTI has been loosely correlated with MO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BTI jumps, then MO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BTI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BTI | 100% | -0.47% | ||
MO - BTI | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
IMBBY - BTI | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
PM - BTI | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
BTAFF - BTI | 38% Loosely correlated | -3.82% | ||
UVV - BTI | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.02% | ||
More |