BTOW
Price
$0.03
Change
+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
6.96M
PANW
Price
$217.75
Change
+$6.71 (+3.18%)
Updated
Oct 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
142.85B
36 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTOW vs PANW

Header iconBTOW vs PANW Comparison
Open Charts BTOW vs PANWBanner chart's image
GTFN Holdings
Price$0.03
Change+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Volume$1.24K
Capitalization6.96M
Palo Alto Networks
Price$217.75
Change+$6.71 (+3.18%)
Volume$53.06K
Capitalization142.85B
BTOW vs PANW Comparison Chart in %
BTOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PANW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTOW vs. PANW commentary
Oct 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTOW is a Hold and PANW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2025
Stock price -- (BTOW: $0.03 vs. PANW: $217.79)
Brand notoriety: BTOW: Not notable vs. PANW: Notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTOW: 200% vs. PANW: 65%
Market capitalization -- BTOW: $6.96M vs. PANW: $147.42B
BTOW [@Computer Communications] is valued at $6.96M. PANW’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $147.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.9T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTOW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePANW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BTOW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PANW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PANW is a better buy in the long-term than BTOW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTOW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PANW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTOW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • PANW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTOW is a better buy in the short-term than PANW.

Price Growth

BTOW (@Computer Communications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PANW (@Computer Communications) price change was +5.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +67.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

PANW is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+2.57% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PANW($143B) has a higher market cap than BTOW($6.96M). PANW YTD gains are higher at: 15.982 vs. BTOW (-96.650).
BTOWPANWBTOW / PANW
Capitalization6.96M143B0%
EBITDAN/A1.94B-
Gain YTD-96.65015.982-605%
P/E RatioN/A131.90-
RevenueN/A9.22B-
Total CashN/A2.9B-
Total DebtN/A338M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTOW vs PANW: Fundamental Ratings
BTOW
PANW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3521
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10010
SMR RATING
1..100
10050
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5825
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1006
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTOW's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PANW (89) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that BTOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than PANW’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTOW (100) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew significantly faster than BTOW’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's SMR Rating (50) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTOW (100) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTOW’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's Price Growth Rating (25) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTOW (58) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTOW’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTOW (100) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew significantly faster than BTOW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTOWPANW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PANW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSCX21.520.03
+0.14%
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corp Bd ETF
OCTM32.240.02
+0.07%
FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF – Oct
BSMU21.960.01
+0.05%
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Muncpl Bd ETF
FTEC224.76-2.22
-0.98%
Fidelity MSCI Information Tech ETF
TMFX21.66-0.26
-1.18%
Motley Fool Next ETF

BTOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTOW and AKAFF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTOW and AKAFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTOW
1D Price
Change %
BTOW100%
N/A
AKAFF - BTOW
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHKP - BTOW
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
WPNDF - BTOW
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PANW - BTOW
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.20%
CINGF - BTOW
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.09%
More