BTOW
Price
$0.02
Change
-$1.22 (-98.39%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
3.22M
PANW
Price
$168.17
Change
+$1.11 (+0.66%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
112.33B
6 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTOW vs PANW

Header iconBTOW vs PANW Comparison
Open Charts BTOW vs PANWBanner chart's image
GTFN Holdings
Price$0.02
Change-$1.22 (-98.39%)
Volume$118
Capitalization3.22M
Palo Alto Networks
Price$168.17
Change+$1.11 (+0.66%)
Volume$10.22M
Capitalization112.33B
BTOW vs PANW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PANW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTOW vs. PANW commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTOW is a Hold and PANW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (BTOW: $0.02 vs. PANW: $168.17)
Brand notoriety: BTOW: Not notable vs. PANW: Notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTOW: 110% vs. PANW: 144%
Market capitalization -- BTOW: $3.22M vs. PANW: $112.33B
BTOW [@Computer Communications] is valued at $3.22M. PANW’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $112.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTOW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePANW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BTOW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PANW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PANW is a better buy in the long-term than BTOW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTOW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PANW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTOW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PANW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTOW is a better buy in the short-term than PANW.

Price Growth

BTOW (@Computer Communications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PANW (@Computer Communications) price change was -1.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

PANW is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+0.08% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PANW($112B) has a higher market cap than BTOW($3.22M). PANW YTD gains are higher at: -7.579 vs. BTOW (-98.450).
BTOWPANWBTOW / PANW
Capitalization3.22M112B0%
EBITDAN/A1.66B-
Gain YTD-98.450-7.5791,299%
P/E RatioN/A96.65-
RevenueN/A8.88B-
Total CashN/A3.3B-
Total DebtN/A729M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTOW vs PANW: Fundamental Ratings
BTOW
PANW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3753
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10017
SMR RATING
1..100
10043
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9963
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1009
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTOW's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PANW (87) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that BTOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than PANW’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTOW (100) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew significantly faster than BTOW’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's SMR Rating (43) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTOW (100) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTOW’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTOW (99) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTOW’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTOW (100) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew significantly faster than BTOW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTOWPANW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PANW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SYNA64.120.60
+0.94%
Synaptics
NVFY1.830.01
+0.83%
Nova Lifestyle
CPF27.050.15
+0.56%
Central Pacific Financial Corp
HSPO12.19N/A
N/A
Horizon Space Acquisition I Corp
RVTY85.80-1.04
-1.20%
Revvity

BTOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTOW and AKAFF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTOW and AKAFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTOW
1D Price
Change %
BTOW100%
N/A
AKAFF - BTOW
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHKP - BTOW
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
WPNDF - BTOW
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PANW - BTOW
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
CINGF - BTOW
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.78%
More

PANW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PANW
1D Price
Change %
PANW100%
+0.66%
CRWD - PANW
68%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
ZS - PANW
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
NOW - PANW
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
ADSK - PANW
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.08%
EXSPF - PANW
60%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More