Ad is loading...
BTTR
Price
$1.70
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
LW
Price
$76.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
41 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BTTR vs LW

Header iconBTTR vs LW Comparison
Open Charts BTTR vs LWBanner chart's image
Better Choice
Price$1.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$32.47K
CapitalizationN/A
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$76.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.27M
CapitalizationN/A
BTTR vs LW Comparison Chart
Loading...
BTTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTTR vs. LW commentary
Nov 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTTR is a Hold and LW is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2024
Stock price -- (BTTR: $1.70 vs. LW: $76.75)
Brand notoriety: BTTR and LW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTTR: 49% vs. LW: 50%
Market capitalization -- BTTR: $4.94M vs. LW: $15.38B
BTTR [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $4.94M. LW’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $15.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTTR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BTTR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than BTTR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTTR’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTTR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the short-term than BTTR.

Price Growth

BTTR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -5.46% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -4.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

BTTR is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2024.

LW is expected to report earnings on Jan 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.06% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($15.4B) has a higher market cap than BTTR($4.94M). LW has higher P/E ratio than BTTR: LW (13.62) vs BTTR (1.32). LW YTD gains are higher at: -27.658 vs. BTTR (-86.018). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. BTTR (-29.59M). BTTR has less debt than LW: BTTR (4.77M) vs LW (3.63B). LW has higher revenues than BTTR: LW (6.35B) vs BTTR (42.2M).
BTTRLWBTTR / LW
Capitalization4.94M15.4B0%
EBITDA-29.59M1.34B-2%
Gain YTD-86.018-27.658311%
P/E Ratio1.3213.6210%
Revenue42.2M6.35B1%
Total Cash42N/A-
Total Debt4.77M3.63B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTTR vs LW: Fundamental Ratings
BTTR
LW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5973
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10089
SMR RATING
1..100
9826
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9255
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10039
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a38

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LW's Valuation (48) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BTTR (64) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to BTTR’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BTTR (100) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to BTTR’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (26) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTTR (98) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew significantly faster than BTTR’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTTR (92) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTTR’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTTR (100) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTTR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTTRLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BTTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EWBC106.831.33
+1.26%
East West Bancorp
TGL0.31N/A
+0.71%
Treasure Global
BATRA41.370.13
+0.32%
Atlanta Braves Holdings
ELA6.50N/A
N/A
Envela Corp
PNTG30.50-0.28
-0.91%
Pennant Group (The)

BTTR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTTR and LW have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTTR and LW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTTR
1D Price
Change %
BTTR100%
-4.40%
LW - BTTR
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
AMNC - BTTR
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PPC - BTTR
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
SENEA - BTTR
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.87%
THS - BTTR
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.24%
More

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and RSGUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and RSGUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
+0.84%
RSGUF - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
POST - LW
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.30%
ATPC - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.56%
K - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
USNA - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
More