GIS
Price
$35.75
Change
-$0.67 (-1.84%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
19.08B
51 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LW
Price
$52.55
Change
-$1.00 (-1.87%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
7.22B
59 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GIS vs LW

GIS vs LW Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GIS vs. LW commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GIS is a Hold and LW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (GIS: $35.75 vs. LW: $52.55)
Brand notoriety: GIS: Notable vs. LW: Not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GIS: 88% vs. LW: 67%
Market capitalization -- GIS: $19.08B vs. LW: $7.22B
GIS [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $19.08B. LW’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $7.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $255.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $3.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GIS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GIS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than GIS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GIS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GIS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the short-term than GIS.

Price Growth

GIS (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -0.78% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +5.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

GIS is expected to report earnings on Sep 23, 2026.

LW is expected to report earnings on Oct 01, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.21% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GIS($19.1B) has a higher market cap than LW($7.23B). LW has higher P/E ratio than GIS: LW (25.26) vs GIS (9.23). LW YTD gains are higher at: 27.620 vs. GIS (-19.347). GIS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.53B vs. LW (988M). GIS has more cash in the bank: 454M vs. LW (68.2M). LW has less debt than GIS: LW (3.94B) vs GIS (13.9B). GIS has higher revenues than LW: GIS (18.4B) vs LW (6.61B).
GISLWGIS / LW
Capitalization19.1B7.23B264%
EBITDA1.53B988M155%
Gain YTD-19.34727.620-70%
P/E Ratio9.2325.2637%
Revenue18.4B6.61B278%
Total Cash454M68.2M666%
Total Debt13.9B3.94B353%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GIS vs LW: Fundamental Ratings
GIS
LW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7642
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9254
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6041
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8138
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a46

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GIS's Valuation (8) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LW (24) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that GIS’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

GIS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LW (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that GIS’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (54) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GIS (92) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than GIS’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as GIS (60) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to GIS’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GIS (81) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than GIS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GISLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GIS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DSS0.540.04
+7.30%
DSS
NOEM11.530.38
+3.41%
CO2 Energy Transition Corp
ACHV6.420.12
+1.90%
Achieve Life Sciences
STE228.40-2.81
-1.22%
STERIS plc
SHOO46.08-1.75
-3.66%
Steven Madden Ltd

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LW has been loosely correlated with CAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LW jumps, then CAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
-1.87%
CAG - LW
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.46%
INGR - LW
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
CPB - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
GIS - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
POST - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
More