Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BULD vs SMH
BULD vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts BULD vs SMH
BULD vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BULD vs. SMH commentary
Jul 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BULD is a Buy and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 70.1B vs. BULD (15.3M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than BULD: SMH (69.669) vs BULD (36.477). BULD was incepted earlier than SMH: BULD (4 years) vs SMH (15 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than BULD (0.49). BULD has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| BULD | SMH | BULD / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 36.477 | 69.669 | 52% |
| Net Assets | 15.3M | 70.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.35 | 140% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 12.00 | 267% |
| Yield | 0.24 | 0.17 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BULD | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 79% | 21 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BULD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BULD and ACLS have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BULD and ACLS's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BULD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BULD | 100% | N/A | ||
| ACLS - BULD | 29% Poorly correlated | -4.74% | ||
| KLAC - BULD | 28% Poorly correlated | -4.00% | ||
| AMAT - BULD | 27% Poorly correlated | -4.50% | ||
| LRCX - BULD | 26% Poorly correlated | -5.83% | ||
| ASML - BULD | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.97% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | N/A | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | -5.83% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -4.00% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | -4.50% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -3.97% | ||
| MPWR - SMH | 80% Closely correlated | -4.54% | ||
More | ||||