Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BULD vs SMH
BULD vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts BULD vs SMH
BULD vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BULD vs. SMH commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BULD is a Buy and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 72.1B vs. BULD (16.6M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than BULD: SMH (63.224) vs BULD (44.058). BULD was incepted earlier than SMH: BULD (4 years) vs SMH (15 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than BULD (0.49). BULD has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| BULD | SMH | BULD / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 44.058 | 63.224 | 70% |
| Net Assets | 16.6M | 72.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.35 | 140% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 12.00 | 267% |
| Yield | 0.27 | 0.20 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BULD | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 79% | 18 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BULD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BULD has been loosely correlated with ACLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BULD jumps, then ACLS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BULD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BULD | 100% | -0.77% | ||
| ACLS - BULD | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| AMAT - BULD | 33% Poorly correlated | -5.12% | ||
| KLAC - BULD | 33% Poorly correlated | -2.70% | ||
| LRCX - BULD | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.38% | ||
| ASML - BULD | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.21% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -0.22% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 89% Closely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -5.12% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| MU - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +2.30% | ||
More | ||||