BWLP
Price
$10.83
Change
-$0.65 (-5.66%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.65B
96 days until earnings call
ECO
Price
$23.25
Change
-$0.60 (-2.52%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
767.31M
82 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWLP vs ECO

Header iconBWLP vs ECO Comparison
Open Charts BWLP vs ECOBanner chart's image
BW LPG
Price$10.83
Change-$0.65 (-5.66%)
Volume$400.29K
Capitalization1.65B
Okeanis Eco Tankers
Price$23.25
Change-$0.60 (-2.52%)
Volume$132.91K
Capitalization767.31M
BWLP vs ECO Comparison Chart
Loading...
BWLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ECO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWLP vs. ECO commentary
May 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLP is a Buy and ECO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 22, 2025
Stock price -- (BWLP: $10.83 vs. ECO: $23.25)
Brand notoriety: BWLP and ECO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWLP: 94% vs. ECO: 89%
Market capitalization -- BWLP: $1.65B vs. ECO: $767.31M
BWLP [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $1.65B. ECO’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $767.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $34.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWLP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileECO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BWLP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ECO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BWLP and ECO are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWLP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ECO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWLP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ECO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BWLP is a better buy in the short-term than ECO.

Price Growth

BWLP (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -8.92% price change this week, while ECO (@Marine Shipping) price change was -6.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWLP is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2025.

ECO is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+0.10% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWLP($1.65B) has a higher market cap than ECO($767M). ECO has higher P/E ratio than BWLP: ECO (9.38) vs BWLP (5.79). ECO YTD gains are higher at: 11.213 vs. BWLP (-0.902). BWLP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 773M vs. ECO (215M). BWLP has less debt than ECO: BWLP (602M) vs ECO (657M). BWLP has higher revenues than ECO: BWLP (3.6B) vs ECO (400M).
BWLPECOBWLP / ECO
Capitalization1.65B767M215%
EBITDA773M215M360%
Gain YTD-0.90211.213-8%
P/E Ratio5.799.3862%
Revenue3.6B400M901%
Total Cash93.5MN/A-
Total Debt602M657M92%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWLP: Fundamental Ratings
BWLP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
12
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
42
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWLPECO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ECO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTSIX30.27N/A
N/A
Invesco Small Cap Growth Inv
JCVVX24.58N/A
N/A
JHancock Classic Value R5
FZEMX41.10N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Z
PGSLX11.62N/A
N/A
Principal Global Sus Lstd Inf Inst
TSCGX16.89-0.47
-2.71%
Thrivent Small Cap Growth S

BWLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWLP has been loosely correlated with HAFN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWLP jumps, then HAFN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWLP
1D Price
Change %
BWLP100%
-5.66%
HAFN - BWLP
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
ECO - BWLP
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.52%
SFL - BWLP
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
GNK - BWLP
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.15%
DAC - BWLP
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
More

ECO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECO has been closely correlated with HAFN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECO jumps, then HAFN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECO
1D Price
Change %
ECO100%
-2.52%
HAFN - ECO
72%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
NAT - ECO
72%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
ASC - ECO
71%
Closely correlated
-2.40%
SFL - ECO
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
BWLP - ECO
59%
Loosely correlated
-5.66%
More