This stock comparison examines BWMN and STN, two players in the engineering and consulting sector focused on infrastructure and built environment services. Investors seeking exposure to industrials amid infrastructure spending trends or traders eyeing relative performance in volatile markets may find value here. With BWMN representing agile growth and STN established scale, the analysis highlights recent momentum, financial positioning, and market sentiment shifts to inform stock comparison decisions in the current environment.
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd (BWMN) is a professional services firm providing integrated engineering, technical consulting, and program management for infrastructure projects across transportation, energy, and environmental sectors. In recent market activity, the stock has shown elevated volatility, with a beta of 1.36 reflecting sensitivity to broader industrials moves. Over the past 30 days, shares fluctuated between $28.64 and $37.52, ending down about 8% amid broader sector pressures. Key influences include Q1 2026 results with gross revenue of $126.5 million and raised full-year guidance signaling over 20% revenue growth to $520–$540 million, driven by a $653 million backlog and acquisitions. Analyst updates, such as JPMorgan raising its target to $40, have supported sentiment, though high P/E of 56.08 underscores growth expectations versus current stability.
Stantec Inc (STN) delivers professional services in engineering, architecture, environmental consulting, and project management for infrastructure, facilities, and sustainability projects globally. Recent weeks have seen relatively stable price action, with shares ranging $85.58–$93.62 over the past 30 days and a modest ~0.5% decline, aided by lower beta of 0.72. Sentiment benefits from the 19th annual sustainability report noting 68% ($5.5 billion CAD) of revenue from sustainability initiatives, alongside Q4 beats and pending Q1 earnings on May 13. Trading at a P/E of 28.38 with YTD return of -8.13%, performance reflects market caution on larger-cap industrials, tempered by buy ratings and raised targets like RBC's to $175 CAD.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from its library of 351, tailored to current market conditions like volatility in semiconductors, industrials, and data centers. These bots employ diverse strategies—AI/ML pattern recognition, trend-following, and risk-managed take-profit/stop-loss (TP/SL) corridors—across stocks, ETFs, and crypto, trading 1–18 tickers per bot. Standout stats include annualized returns up to +285%, win rates of 50–88%, profit factors to 11.70, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 19. Selection favors bots excelling in promising sectors, offering traders varied timeframes from 1-day scalps to 46-day holds. Explore these for potential edges in dynamic markets.
Both BWMN and STN thrive in engineering consulting for infrastructure, but diverge in scale and risk. BWMN’s nimble model fuels faster growth (TTM revenue $504M, 1-year return 41%) via backlog expansion and M&A (e.g., Smith & Associates), exposing it to higher volatility. STN leverages global reach (TTM revenue $6.49B) for steadier momentum, with sustainability as a key driver amid ESG trends, though recent share weakness highlights sector headwinds. Risk trade-offs: BWMN’s beta suits aggressive traders; STN’s dividend and lower valuation appeal to conservative investors. Sentiment favors BWMN for upside potential versus STN’s proven scale.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors BWMN for its trend consistency in growth metrics, including raised guidance and superior relative performance amid industrials volatility. While STN offers stability and catalysts like sustainability revenue, BWMN’s backlog momentum and analyst target upside (~39% to $48) position it probabilistically stronger for near-term outperformance in a risk-on environment.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BWMN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BWMN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BWMN (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -6.41% price change this week, while STN (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -4.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.78%.
BWMN is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
STN is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| BWMN | STN | BWMN / STN | |
| Capitalization | 514M | 7.79B | 7% |
| EBITDA | 47M | 1.13B | 4% |
| Gain YTD | -11.175 | -27.830 | 40% |
| P/E Ratio | 47.82 | 22.62 | 211% |
| Revenue | 504M | 8.29B | 6% |
| Total Cash | 12M | 374M | 3% |
| Total Debt | 251M | 2.59B | 10% |
STN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BWMN | STN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 78% | 13 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 7 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 39% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWMN has been loosely correlated with MTRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWMN jumps, then MTRX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BWMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BWMN | 100% | -1.08% | ||
| MTRX - BWMN | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| GVA - BWMN | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| ORN - BWMN | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| IESC - BWMN | 44% Loosely correlated | -5.86% | ||
| ROAD - BWMN | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.15% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STN has been loosely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STN jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STN | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| ACM - STN | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
| J - STN | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| TTEK - STN | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.28% | ||
| EXPO - STN | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.60% | ||
| PRIM - STN | 35% Loosely correlated | -21.59% | ||
More | ||||