BWMN
Price
$29.06
Change
-$0.30 (-1.02%)
Updated
Jun 24, 03:30 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
513.5M
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STN
Price
$69.28
Change
+$1.18 (+1.73%)
Updated
Jun 24, 03:44 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.79B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWMN vs STN

BWMN vs STN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Bowman Consulting Group Ltd (BWMN) vs. Stantec Inc (STN) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • BWMN trades at a market cap of approximately $609 million with a 52-week range of $24.26–$45.83, showing higher volatility (beta 1.36) and stronger 1-year return of 40.77%.
  • STN, with a $9.97 billion market cap, offers greater stability (beta 0.72) but lags in 1-year performance at 6.54%, trading in a 52-week range of $84.08–$114.52.
  • Recent market activity saw BWMN fluctuate more sharply (down ~8% over past 30 days) amid Q1 earnings and raised 2026 guidance for over 20% revenue growth.
  • STN experienced milder declines (~0.5% over past 30 days), bolstered by sustainability report highlighting 68% sustainability-driven revenue and upcoming earnings.
  • Both firms operate in engineering and consulting, but STN's scale provides dividend yield (~0.78%) while BWMN emphasizes growth with analyst targets around $48.
  • Analyst sentiment leans positive for both, with recent price target raises for BWMN (to $40) and buy ratings for STN.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines BWMN and STN, two players in the engineering and consulting sector focused on infrastructure and built environment services. Investors seeking exposure to industrials amid infrastructure spending trends or traders eyeing relative performance in volatile markets may find value here. With BWMN representing agile growth and STN established scale, the analysis highlights recent momentum, financial positioning, and market sentiment shifts to inform stock comparison decisions in the current environment.

BWMN Overview and Recent Performance

Bowman Consulting Group Ltd (BWMN) is a professional services firm providing integrated engineering, technical consulting, and program management for infrastructure projects across transportation, energy, and environmental sectors. In recent market activity, the stock has shown elevated volatility, with a beta of 1.36 reflecting sensitivity to broader industrials moves. Over the past 30 days, shares fluctuated between $28.64 and $37.52, ending down about 8% amid broader sector pressures. Key influences include Q1 2026 results with gross revenue of $126.5 million and raised full-year guidance signaling over 20% revenue growth to $520–$540 million, driven by a $653 million backlog and acquisitions. Analyst updates, such as JPMorgan raising its target to $40, have supported sentiment, though high P/E of 56.08 underscores growth expectations versus current stability.

STN Overview and Recent Performance

Stantec Inc (STN) delivers professional services in engineering, architecture, environmental consulting, and project management for infrastructure, facilities, and sustainability projects globally. Recent weeks have seen relatively stable price action, with shares ranging $85.58–$93.62 over the past 30 days and a modest ~0.5% decline, aided by lower beta of 0.72. Sentiment benefits from the 19th annual sustainability report noting 68% ($5.5 billion CAD) of revenue from sustainability initiatives, alongside Q4 beats and pending Q1 earnings on May 13. Trading at a P/E of 28.38 with YTD return of -8.13%, performance reflects market caution on larger-cap industrials, tempered by buy ratings and raised targets like RBC's to $175 CAD.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from its library of 351, tailored to current market conditions like volatility in semiconductors, industrials, and data centers. These bots employ diverse strategies—AI/ML pattern recognition, trend-following, and risk-managed take-profit/stop-loss (TP/SL) corridors—across stocks, ETFs, and crypto, trading 1–18 tickers per bot. Standout stats include annualized returns up to +285%, win rates of 50–88%, profit factors to 11.70, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 19. Selection favors bots excelling in promising sectors, offering traders varied timeframes from 1-day scalps to 46-day holds. Explore these for potential edges in dynamic markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Both BWMN and STN thrive in engineering consulting for infrastructure, but diverge in scale and risk. BWMN’s nimble model fuels faster growth (TTM revenue $504M, 1-year return 41%) via backlog expansion and M&A (e.g., Smith & Associates), exposing it to higher volatility. STN leverages global reach (TTM revenue $6.49B) for steadier momentum, with sustainability as a key driver amid ESG trends, though recent share weakness highlights sector headwinds. Risk trade-offs: BWMN’s beta suits aggressive traders; STN’s dividend and lower valuation appeal to conservative investors. Sentiment favors BWMN for upside potential versus STN’s proven scale.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors BWMN for its trend consistency in growth metrics, including raised guidance and superior relative performance amid industrials volatility. While STN offers stability and catalysts like sustainability revenue, BWMN’s backlog momentum and analyst target upside (~39% to $48) position it probabilistically stronger for near-term outperformance in a risk-on environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BWMN vs. STN commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWMN is a StrongBuy and STN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (BWMN: $29.33 vs. STN: $68.10)
Brand notoriety: BWMN and STN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWMN: 184% vs. STN: 108%
Market capitalization -- BWMN: $513.5M vs. STN: $7.79B
BWMN [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $513.5M. STN’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $7.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $10.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWMN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BWMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, STN is a better buy in the long-term than BWMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWMN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWMN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • STN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STN is a better buy in the short-term than BWMN.

Price Growth

BWMN (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -6.41% price change this week, while STN (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -4.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWMN is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

STN is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-0.11% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STN($7.79B) has a higher market cap than BWMN($514M). BWMN has higher P/E ratio than STN: BWMN (47.82) vs STN (22.62). BWMN YTD gains are higher at: -11.175 vs. STN (-27.830). STN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.13B vs. BWMN (47M). STN has more cash in the bank: 374M vs. BWMN (12M). BWMN has less debt than STN: BWMN (251M) vs STN (2.59B). STN has higher revenues than BWMN: STN (8.29B) vs BWMN (504M).
BWMNSTNBWMN / STN
Capitalization514M7.79B7%
EBITDA47M1.13B4%
Gain YTD-11.175-27.83040%
P/E Ratio47.8222.62211%
Revenue504M8.29B6%
Total Cash12M374M3%
Total Debt251M2.59B10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STN: Fundamental Ratings
STN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
19
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70
SMR RATING
1..100
56
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWMNSTN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCVFX39.06N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Value C
WDIAX16.63N/A
N/A
Wilmington Enhanced Div Inc Strat A
HCAIX108.12N/A
N/A
Harbor Capital Appreciation Inv
JDURX15.83N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Utility R
PIIOX14.99N/A
N/A
Principal International Equity Index R3

BWMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWMN has been loosely correlated with MTRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWMN jumps, then MTRX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWMN
1D Price
Change %
BWMN100%
-1.08%
MTRX - BWMN
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
GVA - BWMN
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
ORN - BWMN
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
IESC - BWMN
44%
Loosely correlated
-5.86%
ROAD - BWMN
41%
Loosely correlated
-3.15%
More

STN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STN has been loosely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STN jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STN
1D Price
Change %
STN100%
-0.58%
ACM - STN
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.78%
J - STN
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
TTEK - STN
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.28%
EXPO - STN
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.60%
PRIM - STN
35%
Loosely correlated
-21.59%
More