Advertisement
J vs STN
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Jacobs Solutions (J) vs. Stantec (STN) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both J and STN operate in the engineering and construction sector, with J showing a record $27 billion backlog after strong Q2 earnings, while STN reports 68% sustainability-driven revenue.
- J trades at a forward P/E of 16.16 versus STN's 19.42, indicating potentially better valuation amid recent AI infrastructure demand.
- Year-to-date, both stocks have faced headwinds, with J down 10.36% and STN down 8.13%, but J raised its FY26 outlook.
- Tickeron AI rates J as StrongBuy and STN as Buy, citing J's scale and catalysts.
- STN exhibits higher profitability with a 7.38% profit margin compared to J's 2.90%.
Introduction
In the competitive engineering and construction sector, Jacobs Solutions (J) and Stantec (STN) stand out as key players providing infrastructure, design, and consulting services to public and private clients worldwide. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market performance, financial metrics, and growth drivers amid rising demand for sustainable infrastructure and AI-related projects. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors focused on long-term stability in industrials will find value in understanding their relative positioning, business models, and sector exposure in the current market environment.
J Overview and Recent Performance
Jacobs Solutions (J), a global leader in engineering, design, and consulting, serves sectors including infrastructure, water, transportation, healthcare, and technology from its base in Dallas, Texas. With approximately 60,000 employees, the company reported robust Q2 fiscal 2026 results, featuring 22% year-over-year adjusted EPS growth to $1.75 and revenue of $3.69 billion. A record $27 billion backlog underscores strong demand, bolstered by AI infrastructure projects and synergies from acquisitions like PA Consulting. Recent market activity has seen J trading around $118, down 10.36% year-to-date but with analysts raising price targets to $169 following an uplifted FY26 profit forecast. Sentiment has improved on project wins like Sydney Metro West and resilient quarterly revenue growth of 27% year-over-year, though higher debt levels at 138.78% debt-to-equity weigh on volatility.
STN Overview and Recent Performance
Stantec (STN), headquartered in Edmonton, Canada, delivers professional services in infrastructure, environmental consulting, architecture, and engineering across North America and internationally. The firm emphasizes sustainable solutions, with its latest sustainability report highlighting 68% of revenue (C$5.5 billion) driven by such initiatives. Recent trading has placed shares near $87, reflecting an 8.13% year-to-date decline amid broader sector pressures. Key influences include anticipation for upcoming earnings on May 13, solid quarterly revenue growth of 10.90% year-over-year, and a healthier profit margin of 7.38%. While backlog details remain strong, recent share price weakness has sparked valuation discussions, with analysts noting growth potential despite a forward P/E of 19.42 and lower debt-to-equity ratio of 78.60%. Market sentiment balances sustainability leadership against short-term momentum challenges.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, selected from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Out of 351 total bots, 25 trending ones are highlighted, featuring annualized returns up to 285%, win rates of 70-80% or higher (e.g., 88.33%), and profit factors reaching 11.70. These bots span sectors like industrials, AI infrastructure, data centers, and construction-related plays (e.g., FIX, PWR, ETN), employing momentum, sector rotation, and short-term patterns on 15-60 minute frames. Ideal for traders seeking data-driven edges, the curated list adapts to current volatility in growth areas. Explore these high-potential bots to enhance your strategy.
Head-to-Head Comparison
J and STN share engineering and construction exposure but differ in scale and focus: J's $13.98 billion market cap dwarfs STN's $9.98 billion, with larger revenue ($13.17 billion TTM vs. $6.49 billion) and cash reserves. Growth drivers for J include AI buildout and mega-backlogs, contrasting STN's sustainability emphasis. Recent momentum favors STN slightly in the past month (+5.1% vs. +0.69%), but J shows superior quarterly revenue growth (27% vs. 10.90%). Risk profiles highlight STN's stronger ROE (15.50% vs. 9.38%) and lower leverage, while J offers a cheaper forward valuation. Market sentiment tilts toward J post-earnings, with loosely correlated price action (55%).
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently favor J over STN, citing its larger scale, diversified revenue streams, recent earnings catalysts like the $27 billion backlog, and relatively lower volatility. While STN excels in profitability and sustainability trends, J's uplifted guidance and project pipeline suggest higher probability of near-term outperformance in infrastructure and AI-driven demand.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is J is a StrongBuy and STN is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
J’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- J’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- STN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
J’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- J’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- STN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
J (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -4.71% price change this week, while STN (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -3.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.26%.
Reported Earning Dates
J is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
STN is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-1.69% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| J | STN | J / STN | |
| Capitalization | 14B | 7.82B | 179% |
| EBITDA | 894M | 1.13B | 79% |
| Gain YTD | -9.871 | -27.406 | 36% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.01 | 22.62 | 155% |
| Revenue | 13.2B | 8.29B | 159% |
| Total Cash | 1.37B | 374M | 367% |
| Total Debt | 4.56B | 2.59B | 176% |
J | STN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 80 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
J's Valuation (36) in the null industry is in the same range as STN (42) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that J’s stock grew similarly to STN’s over the last 12 months.
STN's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as J (88) in the null industry. This means that STN’s stock grew similarly to J’s over the last 12 months.
STN's SMR Rating (56) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as J (69) in the null industry. This means that STN’s stock grew similarly to J’s over the last 12 months.
J's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as STN (80) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that J’s stock grew similarly to STN’s over the last 12 months.
J's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as STN (91) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that J’s stock grew similarly to STN’s over the last 12 months.
| J | STN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 52% | 12 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 6 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 39% |
Advertisement
J and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, J has been loosely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if J jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.
STN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STN has been loosely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STN jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STN | 100% | +1.20% | ||
| ACM - STN | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| J - STN | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| TTEK - STN | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| EXPO - STN | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| PRIM - STN | 35% Loosely correlated | +6.95% | ||
More | ||||