BY
Price
$39.27
Change
+$0.05 (+0.13%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.78B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CWBC
Price
$25.03
Change
-$0.12 (-0.48%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
679.17M
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BY vs CWBC

BY vs CWBC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BY vs. CWBC commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BY is a Buy and CWBC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (BY: $39.27 vs. CWBC: $25.03)
Brand notoriety: BY and CWBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BY: 63% vs. CWBC: 34%
Market capitalization -- BY: $1.78B vs. CWBC: $679.17M
BY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.78B. CWBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $679.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCWBC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CWBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BY is a better buy in the long-term than CWBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CWBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CWBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CWBC is a better buy in the short-term than BY.

Price Growth

BY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.74% price change this week, while CWBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

BY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

CWBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BY($1.78B) has a higher market cap than CWBC($679M). CWBC has higher P/E ratio than BY: CWBC (14.22) vs BY (12.75). BY YTD gains are higher at: 35.721 vs. CWBC (12.331). BY has more cash in the bank: 60.2M vs. CWBC (27.6M). CWBC has less debt than BY: CWBC (103M) vs BY (580M). BY has higher revenues than CWBC: BY (450M) vs CWBC (148M).
BYCWBCBY / CWBC
Capitalization1.78B679M263%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD35.72112.331290%
P/E Ratio12.7514.2290%
Revenue450M148M304%
Total Cash60.2M27.6M218%
Total Debt580M103M563%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BY vs CWBC: Fundamental Ratings
BY
CWBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3065
SMR RATING
1..100
4360
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4050
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2539
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CWBC's Valuation (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BY (68). This means that CWBC’s stock grew similarly to BY’s over the last 12 months.

BY's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWBC (65). This means that BY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWBC’s over the last 12 months.

BY's SMR Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CWBC (60). This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to CWBC’s over the last 12 months.

BY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CWBC (50). This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to CWBC’s over the last 12 months.

BY's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CWBC (39). This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to CWBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYCWBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CWBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ELCIX45.400.54
+1.20%
Eaton Vance Growth I
CHTCX19.460.21
+1.09%
Invesco Charter C
LSCGX20.360.21
+1.04%
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
GSFTX40.370.01
+0.02%
Columbia Dividend Income Inst
EPLKX24.77N/A
N/A
NYLI Epoch U.S. Equity Yield Class C

BY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BY has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BY jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BY
1D Price
Change %
BY100%
+0.13%
FMBH - BY
87%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
IBCP - BY
86%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
UVSP - BY
86%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
SRCE - BY
85%
Closely correlated
N/A
GABC - BY
85%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
More