Beazer Homes USA (BZH) and Green Brick Partners (GRBK) are both prominent players in the U.S. residential homebuilding industry, operating amid persistent challenges like high mortgage rates and affordability constraints. This stock comparison analyzes their business models, recent financial results, and market positioning to aid investors and traders evaluating opportunities in the cyclical housing sector. Those focused on relative performance, growth potential, and risk in homebuilders will find insights into how these stocks stack up in the current environment.
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. (BZH), headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, designs, builds, and sells single-family homes, townhomes, and condominiums across multiple U.S. markets under brands like Beazer Homes and Choice Plans. In recent market activity, BZH shares have experienced downward pressure, trading near the lower end of their 52-week range amid broader sector volatility. Recent quarterly results showed revenue of about $410 million and a narrower-than-expected loss of $0.03 per share, influenced by reduced closings and cost management efforts. Sentiment has been tempered by litigation charges and softer demand due to elevated interest rates, though the company beat EPS (earnings per share) expectations and maintains a focus on inventory optimization. Key metrics include a market cap around $510 million, trailing P/S (price-to-sales) of 0.28, and ROE (return on equity) of -0.32%, signaling ongoing profitability hurdles.
Green Brick Partners, Inc. (GRBK), based in Plano, Texas, develops and constructs homes through its portfolio of brands in high-growth markets like Texas and Georgia. The stock has shown resilience relative to peers, though recent weeks brought dips amid housing market softness. In its latest quarterly report, GRBK delivered revenue of $465 million, net income of $61 million, and EPS of $1.39, supported by 908 home deliveries despite weather impacts and affordability issues. Positive factors include robust operating cash flow of $56 million and ROA (return on assets) of 9.6%. With a market cap of $2.86 billion, trailing P/E of 9.37, and low debt-to-equity of 17%, GRBK exhibits stronger balance sheet stability.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI-powered trading bots curated from over 350 available bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like AI/ML trend trading, double agents, and take-profit/stop-loss corridors on timeframes from 15 minutes to days, targeting sectors such as semiconductors, industrials, small caps, and volatility plays. Performance stats are impressive, with annualized returns ranging from 68% to over 160%, win rates of 50-75%, profit factors up to 3.33, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 10 in top performers. Only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions earn a spot here, offering varied styles from short-term scalps to longer holds. Traders can explore these high-performing options to enhance strategies in dynamic markets like homebuilding.
Both BZH and GRBK focus on single-family homebuilding but differ in scale and exposure: GRBK leverages fast-growing Sun Belt regions for higher deliveries, while BZH emphasizes energy-efficient designs nationwide. Growth drivers include inventory turnover and pricing power, but GRBK shows superior momentum with positive EPS versus BZH's losses. Risk factors weigh heavier on BZH due to elevated leverage (debt/equity over 100%) and negative ROE, compared to GRBK's conservative balance sheet. Sector-wide sentiment reflects caution on rates, yet GRBK's lower PEG (price/earnings-to-growth) ratio of 1.15 signals better value in relative performance and market positioning.
Tickeron’s AI tools, analyzing trend consistency, financial stability, and catalysts, currently favor GRBK over BZH. GRBK edges ahead with profitable quarters, lower debt exposure, and stronger ROA/ROE metrics, providing a more stable profile amid housing volatility. While BZH demonstrates cost controls and EPS beats, its higher leverage introduces greater uncertainty. This probabilistic assessment highlights GRBK's relatively advantageous positioning for potential outperformance.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BZH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGRBK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BZH’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRBK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BZH (@Homebuilding) experienced а +39.55% price change this week, while GRBK (@Homebuilding) price change was +0.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was -0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.69%.
BZH is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
GRBK is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.
| BZH | GRBK | BZH / GRBK | |
| Capitalization | 688M | 2.82B | 24% |
| EBITDA | -11.12M | 415M | -3% |
| Gain YTD | 24.124 | 4.149 | 581% |
| P/E Ratio | 74.45 | 9.23 | 807% |
| Revenue | 2.11B | 2.1B | 101% |
| Total Cash | 116M | 155M | 75% |
| Total Debt | 1.25B | 329M | 380% |
BZH | GRBK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 40 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GRBK's Valuation (69) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as BZH (98). This means that GRBK’s stock grew similarly to BZH’s over the last 12 months.
GRBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BZH (84). This means that GRBK’s stock grew somewhat faster than BZH’s over the last 12 months.
GRBK's SMR Rating (48) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BZH (90). This means that GRBK’s stock grew somewhat faster than BZH’s over the last 12 months.
GRBK's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as BZH (83). This means that GRBK’s stock grew similarly to BZH’s over the last 12 months.
BZH's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as GRBK (29). This means that BZH’s stock grew similarly to GRBK’s over the last 12 months.
| BZH | GRBK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 7 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 76% | 9 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BZH has been closely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BZH jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRBK has been closely correlated with MTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GRBK jumps, then MTH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRBK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRBK | 100% | -1.26% | ||
| MTH - GRBK | 87% Closely correlated | -2.10% | ||
| PHM - GRBK | 87% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| TMHC - GRBK | 87% Closely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| TOL - GRBK | 86% Closely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| KBH - GRBK | 85% Closely correlated | -3.33% | ||
More | ||||