BZH
Price
$21.36
Change
-$0.48 (-2.20%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.03B
54 days until earnings call
SFM
Price
$169.17
Change
+$1.05 (+0.62%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
6.44B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZH vs SFM

Header iconBZH vs SFM Comparison
Open Charts BZH vs SFMBanner chart's image
Beazer Homes USA
Price$21.36
Change-$0.48 (-2.20%)
Volume$290.13K
Capitalization1.03B
Sprouts Farmers Market
Price$169.17
Change+$1.05 (+0.62%)
Volume$1.12M
Capitalization6.44B
BZH vs SFM Comparison Chart
Loading...
BZH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZH vs. SFM commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZH is a Hold and SFM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BZH: $21.36 vs. SFM: $169.17)
Brand notoriety: BZH and SFM are both not notable
BZH represents the Homebuilding, while SFM is part of the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZH: 70% vs. SFM: 56%
Market capitalization -- BZH: $1.03B vs. SFM: $6.44B
BZH [@Homebuilding] is valued at $1.03B. SFM’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $6.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Homebuilding] industry ranges from $53.71B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $41.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Homebuilding] industry is $7.78B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BZH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFM is a better buy in the long-term than BZH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SFM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFM is a better buy in the short-term than BZH.

Price Growth

BZH (@Homebuilding) experienced а +4.09% price change this week, while SFM (@Food Retail) price change was -2.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.17%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was -0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

BZH is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

SFM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Homebuilding (+0.95% weekly)

Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.

@Food Retail (-0.88% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFM($6.44B) has a higher market cap than BZH($1.04B). SFM has higher P/E ratio than BZH: SFM (25.46) vs BZH (6.41). SFM YTD gains are higher at: 33.131 vs. BZH (-22.214). SFM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 621M vs. BZH (181M). SFM has more cash in the bank: 202M vs. BZH (104M). BZH has less debt than SFM: BZH (993M) vs SFM (1.66B). SFM has higher revenues than BZH: SFM (6.84B) vs BZH (2.15B).
BZHSFMBZH / SFM
Capitalization1.04B6.44B16%
EBITDA181M621M29%
Gain YTD-22.21433.131-67%
P/E Ratio6.4125.4625%
Revenue2.15B6.84B31%
Total Cash104M202M51%
Total Debt993M1.66B60%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZH vs SFM: Fundamental Ratings
BZH
SFM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1279
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
487
SMR RATING
1..100
7628
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2317
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BZH's Valuation (72) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as SFM (92) in the Food Retail industry. This means that BZH’s stock grew similarly to SFM’s over the last 12 months.

SFM's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Food Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BZH (48) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that SFM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BZH’s over the last 12 months.

SFM's SMR Rating (28) in the Food Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BZH (76) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that SFM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BZH’s over the last 12 months.

SFM's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as BZH (62) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that SFM’s stock grew similarly to BZH’s over the last 12 months.

SFM's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as BZH (23) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that SFM’s stock grew similarly to BZH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZHSFM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COAGX52.15N/A
N/A
Gator Capital L/S Fd
BACAX12.88N/A
N/A
BlackRock Energy Opportunities Inv A
CSVZX36.66N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Inst
GARIX20.89N/A
N/A
Gotham Absolute Return Institutional
ACIHX60.64N/A
N/A
American Century Growth G

BZH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BZH has been closely correlated with MHO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BZH jumps, then MHO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZH
1D Price
Change %
BZH100%
-2.20%
MHO - BZH
78%
Closely correlated
-2.20%
TMHC - BZH
78%
Closely correlated
-1.55%
MTH - BZH
78%
Closely correlated
-1.90%
CCS - BZH
77%
Closely correlated
-1.95%
PHM - BZH
76%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
More

SFM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFM has been loosely correlated with NGVC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFM jumps, then NGVC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFM
1D Price
Change %
SFM100%
+0.62%
NGVC - SFM
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
KR - SFM
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
VLGEA - SFM
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
IMKTA - SFM
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
WMK - SFM
17%
Poorly correlated
+2.62%
More