It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BZH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BZH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BZH (@Homebuilding) experienced а +4.09% price change this week, while SFM (@Food Retail) price change was -2.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.17%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was -0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.64%.
BZH is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
SFM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.
@Food Retail (-0.88% weekly)The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.
BZH | SFM | BZH / SFM | |
Capitalization | 1.04B | 6.44B | 16% |
EBITDA | 181M | 621M | 29% |
Gain YTD | -22.214 | 33.131 | -67% |
P/E Ratio | 6.41 | 25.46 | 25% |
Revenue | 2.15B | 6.84B | 31% |
Total Cash | 104M | 202M | 51% |
Total Debt | 993M | 1.66B | 60% |
BZH | SFM | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BZH's Valuation (72) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as SFM (92) in the Food Retail industry. This means that BZH’s stock grew similarly to SFM’s over the last 12 months.
SFM's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Food Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BZH (48) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that SFM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BZH’s over the last 12 months.
SFM's SMR Rating (28) in the Food Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BZH (76) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that SFM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BZH’s over the last 12 months.
SFM's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as BZH (62) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that SFM’s stock grew similarly to BZH’s over the last 12 months.
SFM's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as BZH (23) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that SFM’s stock grew similarly to BZH’s over the last 12 months.
BZH | SFM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago44% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago59% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago84% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago54% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago56% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago77% | 6 days ago77% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 3 days ago53% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago60% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BZH has been closely correlated with MHO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BZH jumps, then MHO could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFM has been loosely correlated with NGVC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFM jumps, then NGVC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SFM | 100% | +0.62% | ||
NGVC - SFM | 33% Loosely correlated | +1.91% | ||
KR - SFM | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
VLGEA - SFM | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.98% | ||
IMKTA - SFM | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
WMK - SFM | 17% Poorly correlated | +2.62% | ||
More |