Advertisement
BZH vs MHO
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Beazer Homes USA (BZH) vs. M/I Homes (MHO) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- M/I Homes (MHO) exhibits stronger financial metrics, including a lower P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of 9.77 versus BZH's 74.45, and positive ROE (return on equity) of 11.60% compared to BZH's -0.32%.
- BZH trades at a discount on P/B (price-to-book) basis at 0.50, signaling potential value amid recent earnings challenges, while MHO's P/B of 1.04 reflects steadier market positioning.
- Recent quarterly revenue declines affected both, with BZH down 27.50% and MHO down 5.70% year-over-year, highlighting sector headwinds like affordability pressures.
- MHO's larger market cap of $3.33B dwarfs BZH's $584M, offering greater scale and liquidity in the competitive homebuilding landscape.
- Tickeron's AI comparison favors MHO for both short- and long-term horizons due to superior cash reserves and EBITDA.
- Homebuilder sentiment remains cautious following earlier reports of potential antitrust scrutiny, impacting relative performance in recent market activity.
Introduction
Beazer Homes USA (BZH) and M/I Homes (MHO), both prominent players in the U.S. homebuilding sector, offer investors exposure to residential construction amid fluctuating housing demand. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, financial health, and market positioning, aiding traders seeking relative value in cyclical industries and long-term investors eyeing growth potential. With interest rates and affordability shaping sentiment, understanding contrasts in scale, valuation, and momentum helps inform portfolio decisions in today's environment.
BZH Overview and Recent Performance
Beazer Homes USA (BZH), headquartered in Atlanta, focuses on energy-efficient single-family homes across multiple U.S. markets. In recent weeks, BZH's stock has faced pressure, trading around $18 with a 52-week range of $17.89-$28.33. The company reported Q2 fiscal 2026 results showing a net loss and revenue of $409.85M, missing estimates amid a 27.50% quarterly revenue drop year-over-year. Sentiment has been influenced by broader homebuilding challenges, including affordability constraints and earlier sector-wide concerns over potential antitrust probes, contributing to heightened volatility and a YTD return of about 11% despite recent declines.
MHO Overview and Recent Performance
M/I Homes (MHO), based in Columbus, Ohio, builds single-family homes and attached dwellings in key Midwest, Mid-Atlantic, and Southern markets. Recently, MHO shares have hovered near $130, within a 52-week range of $103.52-$158.92. Q1 2026 earnings revealed revenue of $920.71M missing expectations but EPS of $2.55 beating forecasts, with a milder 5.70% revenue decline year-over-year. Performance reflects resilient contract growth despite margin pressures from rising costs and market uncertainty, including the same antitrust overhang affecting peers, resulting in a modest YTD gain of 1.67%.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—spanning short-term scalping on 5-minute charts to 60-minute swings—with standout stats like annualized returns up to 162.28%, win rates reaching 88.33%, and profit factors exceeding 4.49. Virtual Agents incorporate risk management, while Signal Agents deliver real-time alerts without minimum balances. Tailored to current conditions like volatility in semiconductors or small caps, they adapt dynamically. Explore these high-performing bots to enhance your trading edge.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both BZH and MHO operate in homebuilding, capitalizing on housing demand but exposed to interest rate sensitivity and supply chain risks. MHO's larger scale ($4.36B revenue vs. BZH's $2.11B) drives superior EBITDA ($504M vs. $21.8M) and cash holdings ($769M vs. $121M), enabling lower debt-to-equity (31.69% vs. 106.89%). BZH offers a value tilt via low P/B but struggles with negative net income and high P/E, contrasting MHO's profitability. Recent momentum favors neither decisively post-earnings, with sector sentiment tempered by affordability and regulatory clouds. MHO edges in stability, while BZH presents higher risk-reward for momentum traders.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI analysis currently favors MHO over BZH in both short- and long-term scenarios, citing MHO's stronger fundamentals, lower valuation multiples, and better profit-risk profile. BZH's technicals show mixed signals amid volatility, while MHO benefits from consistent trends and financial resilience. This positioning suggests higher probability of outperformance for MHO under prevailing market dynamics.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZH is a Hold and MHO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BZH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMHO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BZH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MHO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BZH’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MHO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BZH’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MHO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BZH (@Homebuilding) experienced а +0.70% price change this week, while MHO (@Homebuilding) price change was +3.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.13%.
Reported Earning Dates
BZH is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
MHO is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Homebuilding (+2.41% weekly)Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.
| BZH | MHO | BZH / MHO | |
| Capitalization | 744M | 3.71B | 20% |
| EBITDA | -11.12M | 516M | -2% |
| Gain YTD | 34.336 | 13.357 | 257% |
| P/E Ratio | 74.45 | 10.90 | 683% |
| Revenue | 2.11B | 4.36B | 48% |
| Total Cash | 116M | 767M | 15% |
| Total Debt | 1.25B | 1.01B | 124% |
BZH | MHO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MHO's Valuation (42) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BZH (89). This means that MHO’s stock grew somewhat faster than BZH’s over the last 12 months.
MHO's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BZH (83). This means that MHO’s stock grew somewhat faster than BZH’s over the last 12 months.
MHO's SMR Rating (67) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as BZH (92). This means that MHO’s stock grew similarly to BZH’s over the last 12 months.
BZH's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as MHO (46). This means that BZH’s stock grew similarly to MHO’s over the last 12 months.
BZH's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as MHO (12). This means that BZH’s stock grew similarly to MHO’s over the last 12 months.
| BZH | MHO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 76% | 15 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
BZH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BZH has been closely correlated with HOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BZH jumps, then HOV could also see price increases.
MHO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MHO has been closely correlated with MTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MHO jumps, then MTH could also see price increases.