It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAG’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
CAG (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +3.92% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.24%.
CAG is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2026.
Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
CAG | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CAG | SHRT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 56% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 34% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 7 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 60% | 15 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 63% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAG has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAG jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that SHRT and HSY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHRT and HSY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHRT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHRT | 100% | N/A | ||
| HSY - SHRT | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.91% | ||
| LNG - SHRT | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.80% | ||
| KD - SHRT | 18% Poorly correlated | +2.92% | ||
| EFOR - SHRT | 18% Poorly correlated | +4.22% | ||
| CAG - SHRT | 17% Poorly correlated | +3.62% | ||
More | ||||