Advertisement
CAH vs FOCL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAH is a Hold and FOCL is a Hold.
| CAH | FOCL | CAH / FOCL | |
| Capitalization | 54.6B | 189M | 28,889% |
| EBITDA | 3.48B | -27M | -12,882% |
| Gain YTD | 15.114 | 24.924 | 61% |
| P/E Ratio | 32.49 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 254B | 79.3M | 320,303% |
| Total Cash | 4.86B | 21.5M | 22,586% |
| Total Debt | 8.89B | 41.7M | 21,309% |
CAH | FOCL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CAH's Valuation (70) in the Medical Distributors industry is in the same range as FOCL (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CAH’s stock grew similarly to FOCL’s over the last 12 months.
CAH's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Medical Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for FOCL (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CAH’s stock grew significantly faster than FOCL’s over the last 12 months.
CAH's SMR Rating (99) in the Medical Distributors industry is in the same range as FOCL (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CAH’s stock grew similarly to FOCL’s over the last 12 months.
CAH's Price Growth Rating (30) in the Medical Distributors industry is in the same range as FOCL (57) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CAH’s stock grew similarly to FOCL’s over the last 12 months.
CAH's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Medical Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for FOCL (99) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CAH’s stock grew significantly faster than FOCL’s over the last 12 months.
| CAH | FOCL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 67% | 21 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 43% | 5 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 87% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while FOCL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CAH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- FOCL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FOCL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CAH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FOCL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CAH (@Medical Distributors) experienced а -4.97% price change this week, while FOCL (@Medical Distributors) price change was -0.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was -0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -28.22%.
Reported Earning Dates
CAH is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical Distributors (-0.45% weekly)Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.
Advertisement
CAH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAH has been closely correlated with MCK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAH jumps, then MCK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAH | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| MCK - CAH | 67% Closely correlated | +3.34% | ||
| COR - CAH | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.45% | ||
| HSIC - CAH | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.65% | ||
| FOCL - CAH | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
| YI - CAH | 4% Poorly correlated | -6.72% | ||
More | ||||
FOCL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FOCL and AORT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FOCL and AORT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FOCL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOCL | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| AORT - FOCL | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| SNYR - FOCL | 21% Poorly correlated | -9.54% | ||
| UFPT - FOCL | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
| SENS - FOCL | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.49% | ||
| STXS - FOCL | 16% Poorly correlated | +3.10% | ||
More | ||||