| CANQ | CGBL | CANQ / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 2.845 | 6.232 | 46% |
| Net Assets | 21M | 7.22B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.33 | 285% |
| Turnover | 27.00 | 19.00 | 142% |
| Yield | 4.27 | 1.88 | 227% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 3 years | - |
| CANQ | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 55% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| COWG | 37.90 | 0.07 | +0.19% |
| Pacer US Large Cp CA Cows Gr Ldrs ETF | |||
| NOVM | 33.92 | 0.06 | +0.18% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF – Nov | |||
| IGHG | 78.12 | 0.13 | +0.17% |
| ProShares Investment Grade—Intr Rt Hdgd | |||
| ADIV | 19.55 | -0.19 | -0.96% |
| Guinness Atkinson Asia Pcfc Div Bldr ETF | |||
| BFOC | 16.86 | -0.17 | -1.01% |
| FT Vest Bitcoin Strat Floor15 ETF - Oct | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CANQ has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CANQ jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CANQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CANQ | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| NVDA - CANQ | 70% Closely correlated | +2.93% | ||
| MSFT - CANQ | 66% Loosely correlated | +3.02% | ||
| AAPL - CANQ | 61% Loosely correlated | -7.35% | ||
| META - CANQ | 61% Loosely correlated | +3.28% | ||
| GOOGL - CANQ | 57% Loosely correlated | +6.73% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| TSM - CGBL | 72% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| CAT - CGBL | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| TEL - CGBL | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| AIR - CGBL | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| MU - CGBL | 57% Loosely correlated | -5.90% | ||
More | ||||