It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CART’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileULTA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CART’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ULTA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CART (@Internet Retail) experienced а +3.15% price change this week, while ULTA (@Specialty Stores) price change was -0.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +3.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.86%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.48%.
CART is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
ULTA is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.
The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.
@Specialty Stores (+3.35% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
CART | ULTA | CART / ULTA | |
Capitalization | 11.8B | 25.5B | 46% |
EBITDA | 529M | 1.93B | 27% |
Gain YTD | 9.223 | 7.562 | 122% |
P/E Ratio | 29.76 | 20.31 | 147% |
Revenue | 3.46B | 11.2B | 31% |
Total Cash | 1.63B | 767M | 213% |
Total Debt | 22M | 1.91B | 1% |
CART | ULTA | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 46 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 15 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CART's Valuation (72) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as ULTA (89) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CART’s stock grew similarly to ULTA’s over the last 12 months.
CART's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ULTA (46) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CART’s stock grew somewhat faster than ULTA’s over the last 12 months.
ULTA's SMR Rating (19) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CART (58) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ULTA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CART’s over the last 12 months.
ULTA's Price Growth Rating (15) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CART (48) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ULTA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CART’s over the last 12 months.
CART's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as ULTA (30) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CART’s stock grew similarly to ULTA’s over the last 12 months.
CART | ULTA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago66% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago56% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago89% | 2 days ago69% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago64% | 6 days ago60% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago75% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CART has been loosely correlated with DASH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CART jumps, then DASH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CART | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CART | 100% | +0.85% | ||
DASH - CART | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
SE - CART | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
RVLV - CART | 28% Poorly correlated | -4.16% | ||
QVCGP - CART | 26% Poorly correlated | -5.24% | ||
AMZN - CART | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.75% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ULTA has been loosely correlated with ASO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ULTA jumps, then ASO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ULTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ULTA | 100% | +2.12% | ||
ASO - ULTA | 51% Loosely correlated | -3.66% | ||
HNST - ULTA | 49% Loosely correlated | +4.30% | ||
DKS - ULTA | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
BBWI - ULTA | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
AN - ULTA | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.69% | ||
More |