CASY
Price
$491.00
Change
-$5.00 (-1.01%)
Updated
Aug 29, 03:51 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.44B
10 days until earnings call
RUSHB
Price
$57.75
Change
-$0.97 (-1.65%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.52B
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CASY vs RUSHB

Header iconCASY vs RUSHB Comparison
Open Charts CASY vs RUSHBBanner chart's image
Casey's General Stores
Price$491.00
Change-$5.00 (-1.01%)
Volume$100
Capitalization18.44B
Rush Enterprises
Price$57.75
Change-$0.97 (-1.65%)
Volume$568
Capitalization4.52B
CASY vs RUSHB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CASY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CASY vs. RUSHB commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CASY is a StrongBuy and RUSHB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CASY: $496.00 vs. RUSHB: $58.72)
Brand notoriety: CASY and RUSHB are both not notable
CASY represents the Specialty Stores, while RUSHB is part of the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CASY: 64% vs. RUSHB: 22%
Market capitalization -- CASY: $18.44B vs. RUSHB: $4.52B
CASY [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $18.44B. RUSHB’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $4.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $47.16B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $52.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.07B. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CASY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CASY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RUSHB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHB is a better buy in the long-term than CASY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CASY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CASY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RUSHB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHB is a better buy in the short-term than CASY.

Price Growth

CASY (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -2.78% price change this week, while RUSHB (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +5.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.17%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

CASY is expected to report earnings on Sep 08, 2025.

RUSHB is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.72% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

@Automotive Aftermarket (-0.68% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CASY($18.4B) has a higher market cap than RUSHB($4.52B). CASY has higher P/E ratio than RUSHB: CASY (33.88) vs RUSHB (16.73). CASY YTD gains are higher at: 25.602 vs. RUSHB (8.945). CASY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.2B vs. RUSHB (682M). RUSHB has less debt than CASY: RUSHB (1.75B) vs CASY (2.96B). CASY has higher revenues than RUSHB: CASY (15.9B) vs RUSHB (7.69B).
CASYRUSHBCASY / RUSHB
Capitalization18.4B4.52B407%
EBITDA1.2B682M176%
Gain YTD25.6028.945286%
P/E Ratio33.8816.73203%
Revenue15.9B7.69B207%
Total CashN/A211M-
Total Debt2.96B1.75B169%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CASY vs RUSHB: Fundamental Ratings
CASY
RUSHB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6478
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
311
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4846
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RUSHB's Valuation (34) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CASY (88) in the Food Retail industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CASY’s over the last 12 months.

CASY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as RUSHB (11) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CASY’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.

CASY's SMR Rating (100) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as RUSHB (100) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CASY’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHB's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as CASY (48) in the Food Retail industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to CASY’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHB's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as CASY (100) in the Food Retail industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to CASY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CASYRUSHB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CASY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PABFX19.05N/A
N/A
PGIM Balanced Z
PSCZX25.49N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Small Company Z
VSGIX82.31N/A
N/A
Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index I
LVAGX16.94N/A
N/A
LSV Global Value Investor
FMKFX21.54N/A
N/A
Fidelity Magellan K6

CASY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CASY has been loosely correlated with MUSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CASY jumps, then MUSA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASY
1D Price
Change %
CASY100%
-0.46%
MUSA - CASY
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
TSCO - CASY
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
RUSHB - CASY
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
CPRT - CASY
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
ACVA - CASY
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
More

RUSHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHB has been closely correlated with RUSHA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHB jumps, then RUSHA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHB
1D Price
Change %
RUSHB100%
-0.81%
RUSHA - RUSHB
85%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
GPI - RUSHB
68%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
AN - RUSHB
67%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
ABG - RUSHB
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
PAG - RUSHB
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
More