CATY
Price
$62.92
Change
+$0.39 (+0.62%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
4.2B
93 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FLG
Price
$13.85
Change
-$0.86 (-5.85%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
5.77B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CATY vs FLG

CATY vs FLG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CATY vs. FLG commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CATY is a StrongBuy and FLG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (CATY: $62.92 vs. FLG: $13.85)
Brand notoriety: CATY and FLG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CATY: 68% vs. FLG: 234%
Market capitalization -- CATY: $4.2B vs. FLG: $5.77B
CATY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.2B. FLG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CATY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFLG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CATY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FLG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CATY is a better buy in the long-term than FLG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CATY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CATY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FLG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLG is a better buy in the short-term than CATY.

Price Growth

CATY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.33% price change this week, while FLG (@Regional Banks) price change was -7.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

CATY is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

FLG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.57% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLG($5.77B) has a higher market cap than CATY($4.2B). FLG has higher P/E ratio than CATY: FLG (461.67) vs CATY (12.31). CATY YTD gains are higher at: 31.846 vs. FLG (10.172). FLG has more cash in the bank: 401M vs. CATY (146M). CATY has less debt than FLG: CATY (169M) vs FLG (11.2B). FLG has higher revenues than CATY: FLG (2.07B) vs CATY (845M).
CATYFLGCATY / FLG
Capitalization4.2B5.77B73%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD31.84610.172313%
P/E Ratio12.31461.673%
Revenue845M2.07B41%
Total Cash146M401M36%
Total Debt169M11.2B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CATY vs FLG: Fundamental Ratings
CATY
FLG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9280
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3084
SMR RATING
1..100
3221
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4248
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
40100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CATY's Valuation (62) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLG (97) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLG’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLG (84) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLG’s over the last 12 months.

FLG's SMR Rating (21) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CATY (32) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew similarly to CATY’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FLG (48) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to FLG’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLG (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CATYFLG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CATY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGN4.910.02
+0.41%
GAMCO Global Gold Natural Resources & Income Trust
EMXF57.35N/A
N/A
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF
ABCS34.16N/A
N/A
Alpha Blue Capital US Sm-Md Cp Dyn ETF
IWM291.17-0.92
-0.31%
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
NODE39.05-1.95
-4.76%
VanEck Onchain Economy ETF

FLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLG has been closely correlated with VLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLG jumps, then VLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLG
1D Price
Change %
FLG100%
-5.85%
VLY - FLG
73%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
AUB - FLG
73%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
UBSI - FLG
73%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
CATY - FLG
72%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
FULT - FLG
71%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
More