CBAF
Price
$25.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
RF
Price
$23.87
Change
-$0.19 (-0.79%)
Updated
Oct 29 closing price
79 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CBAF vs RF

Header iconCBAF vs RF Comparison
Open Charts CBAF vs RFBanner chart's image
Citba Financial
Price$25.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.06K
CapitalizationN/A
Regions Financial
Price$23.87
Change-$0.19 (-0.79%)
Volume$5.8M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CBAF vs RF Comparison Chart
Loading...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CBAF vs. RF commentary
Oct 30, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBAF is a Hold and RF is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 30, 2024
Stock price -- (CBAF: $25.25 vs. RF: $23.87)
Brand notoriety: CBAF: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBAF: 14% vs. RF: 78%
Market capitalization -- CBAF: $38.81M vs. RF: $18.9B
CBAF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $38.81M. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $18.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • CBAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the long-term than CBAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CBAF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.08% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

RF is expected to report earnings on Jan 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.91% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RF($18.9B) has a higher market cap than CBAF($38.8M). RF has higher P/E ratio than CBAF: RF (9.74) vs CBAF (5.98). RF YTD gains are higher at: 27.711 vs. CBAF (9.379). RF has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. CBAF (4.07M). CBAF has less debt than RF: CBAF (0) vs RF (2.33B). RF has higher revenues than CBAF: RF (7.57B) vs CBAF (25.2M).
CBAFRFCBAF / RF
Capitalization38.8M18.9B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.37927.71134%
P/E Ratio5.989.7461%
Revenue25.2M7.57B0%
Total Cash4.07M1.55B0%
Total Debt02.33B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBAF vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
CBAF
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9410
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10026
SMR RATING
1..100
666
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4716
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2515
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7525

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBAF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RF (88) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CBAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RF’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBAF (100) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew significantly faster than CBAF’s over the last 12 months.

RF's SMR Rating (6) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBAF (66) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBAF’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CBAF (47) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to CBAF’s over the last 12 months.

RF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CBAF (25) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to CBAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME22.732.16
+10.50%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X69907.7600001978.460900
+2.91%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL233.401.99
+0.86%
Apple
SPY580.831.79
+0.31%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA262.51-6.68
-2.48%
Tesla

CBAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBAF and HBAN have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBAF and HBAN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBAF
1D Price
Change %
CBAF100%
N/A
HBAN - CBAF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
FITB - CBAF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.92%
SNV - CBAF
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.01%
RF - CBAF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
CFBK - CBAF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More