MTB
Price
$224.43
Change
+$3.71 (+1.68%)
Updated
Nov 2 closing price
Capitalization
32.41B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RF
Price
$28.97
Change
+$0.40 (+1.40%)
Updated
Nov 2 closing price
Capitalization
24.68B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTB vs RF

MTB vs RF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 12, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) vs. Regions Financial Corporation (RF) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both MTB and RF are established U.S. regional banks, but they operate in different geographies — the Mid-Atlantic/Northeast versus the Southeast and Midwest.
  • MTB has delivered a stronger recent stock rally (roughly 20% over the past three months) but has pulled back from its record high and trades at a premium valuation.
  • RF has shown steadier, fee-diversified growth and a more defensive valuation, though it recently saw an 11% short-term pullback amid a finance leadership reshuffle.
  • Both banks are expanding fee-based income and using acquisitions to diversify, but RF is investing more visibly in branch expansion across high-growth Southern markets.
  • Dividend profiles differ: MTB pays a larger quarterly dividend, while RF has raised its payout more aggressively and recently boosted its yield above the regional-bank average.

Introduction

This stock comparison evaluates two prominent U.S. regional banks — M&T Bank Corporation and Regions Financial Corporation — to help traders and investors assess their relative performance and market positioning. Both are well-capitalized, dividend-paying lenders whose earnings are shaped by net interest income (NII, the difference between interest earned on loans and interest paid on deposits), fee-based services, and regional credit conditions. While they share the same sector, their geographic footprints, growth strategies, and valuation profiles create meaningful trade-offs. Investors comparing these two names — whether for income, value, or momentum — can benefit from understanding how recent market activity has redefined the risk-reward balance between MTB and RF.

MTB Overview and Recent Performance

M&T Bank Corporation (MTB), headquartered in Buffalo, New York, operates a sustainable regional franchise across 12 Mid-Atlantic states and Washington, D.C., with a strong presence in commercial and industrial (C&I) lending, wealth management, and capital markets. The bank has built scale through disciplined acquisitions, including People's United in 2022, Hudson City Bancorp, and Wilmington Trust.

In recent weeks, MTB has been among the stronger performers in the regional-bank group, gaining roughly 20% over the trailing three months and outpacing the broader market. Management has guided 2026 NII to a range of $7.2 billion to $7.35 billion and fee income to $2.8 billion to $2.85 billion, reflecting loan growth and a diversified revenue base. Recent quarterly results showed a stable net interest margin near 3.7% and a return on average tangible common equity (ROTCE, a measure of profitability on tangible shareholder capital) around 14.5%. However, after reaching a record high, the stock eased in recent trading as analysts flagged a full valuation relative to peers.

RF Overview and Recent Performance

Regions Financial Corporation (RF), based in Birmingham, Alabama, serves individual and corporate customers across the high-growth Southeast and Midwest. The bank has prioritized diversifying its revenue through wealth management, treasury management, and capital markets, including the 2026 acquisition of Frazer Lanier to expand municipal and corporate investment banking.

In recent market activity, RF has delivered steadier, less volatile gains — up roughly 8% to 9% over the past three months — while also experiencing an 11% pullback tied partly to a reshuffling of its finance leadership team. Fundamentals remain solid: the company reported an 18% ROTCE and a common equity tier 1 (CET1, a key measure of bank capital strength) ratio of 10.7%. RF also raised its quarterly dividend and authorized a $3 billion share repurchase program, while outlining plans to open 135–150 new branches over five years, underscoring a growth-oriented, capital-return-friendly strategy.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a systematic edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of the platform's strongest performers. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance history, and statistical profile. Because market conditions shift constantly, only the most suitable and best-performing bots earn a place in this focused section. The featured robots span momentum, trend-following, and swing approaches, with varying win rates and drawdown characteristics, giving traders a transparent snapshot of what is working right now. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help you identify strategies aligned with the current environment for names like MTB and RF.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The clearest contrast between these two banks is geography and growth philosophy. MTB derives strength from a dense, mature Northeast/Mid-Atlantic deposit franchise and a larger, more diversified balance sheet, with significant exposure to commercial real estate and C&I lending. RF leans into faster-growing Southeastern markets, actively adding branches while building out fee-based businesses that reduce dependence on interest-rate swings.

On momentum, MTB has been the stronger recent performer, but that strength has compressed its valuation — it now trades at a premium to peers on forward earnings and tangible book value. RF, by contrast, screens as more inexpensive, with a price-to-earnings ratio around 10.7x versus the regional-bank average, offering a value tilt. Risk profiles differ too: MTB carries meaningful commercial real estate exposure and net-interest-margin sensitivity, while RF faces deposit-pricing competition in the Southeast and near-term uncertainty from its leadership transition. In short, MTB offers scale and recent momentum at a premium, whereas RF offers growth and value at a more modest price.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, relative valuation, and near-term catalysts, Tickeron's AI would likely favor RF on a risk-adjusted basis. While MTB has shown stronger raw momentum and a superior dividend, its premium valuation and post-peak pullback introduce greater mean-reversion risk. RF combines a lower earnings multiple, an improving ROTCE, a robust capital position, and a clearer structural growth path through Southern-market branch expansion and fee diversification. The leadership transition is a transient risk rather than a fundamental deterioration. That said, MTB remains the more powerful trend name, so the AI's preference would hinge on momentum versus value — with stability, valuation support, and catalysts currently tilting the probability slightly toward RF.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MTB vs. RF commentary
Nov 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTB is a Buy and RF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for MTB with price predictions
Nov 02, 2026

Momentum Indicator for MTB turns positive, indicating new upward trend

MTB saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on October 21, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 74 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 47 of the 74 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 64%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where MTB's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 12 of 23 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 52%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MTB just turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where MTB's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 23 of 41 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 56%.

Following a +2.05% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MTB advanced for three days, in 196 of 315 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 146 of 277 cases where MTB Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 53%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 7 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MTB declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 59%.

MTB broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 6 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 33 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 42 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 50 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. MTB’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 60 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.270) is normal, around the industry mean (1.276). P/E Ratio (11.806) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.599). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.307) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.027) settles around the average of (0.036) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.488) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for RF with price predictions
Nov 02, 2026

RF's MACD Histogram crosses above signal line

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for RF turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where RF's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 31 of 43 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where RF's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 20 of 30 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 12, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on RF as a result. In 47 of 72 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.

RF moved above its 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.

The 10-day moving average for RF crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 8 of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.

Following a +0.74% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where RF advanced for three days, in 191 of 315 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 152 of 269 cases where RF Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 57%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 8 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where RF declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 64%.

RF broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 7 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 32 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 34 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 35 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock slightly better than average.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 47 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. RF’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 52 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.413) is normal, around the industry mean (1.276). P/E Ratio (11.729) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.599). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.424) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.041) settles around the average of (0.036) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.269) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTB vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
MTB
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1732
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3335
SMR RATING
1..100
67
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4234
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a32

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RF's Valuation (52) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (35) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's SMR Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (7) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

RF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (42) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTBRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 03, 2026
Stock price -- (MTB: $224.43 vs. RF: $28.97)
Brand notoriety: MTB: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTB: 71% vs. RF: 104%
Market capitalization -- MTB: $32.41B vs. RF: $24.68B
MTB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $32.41B. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $24.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $147.69 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while RF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MTB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MTB and RF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the short-term than MTB.

Price Growth

MTB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.19% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTB is expected to report earnings on Jan 19, 2027.

RF is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2027.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.78% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
MTB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with MTB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then MTB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
+1.40%
MTB - RF
90%
Closely correlated
+1.68%
FITB - RF
88%
Closely correlated
+2.04%
CFG - RF
88%
Closely correlated
+1.76%
TFC - RF
87%
Closely correlated
+2.83%
HBAN - RF
86%
Closely correlated
+1.46%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IT235.266.47
+2.83%
Gartner
DXPE174.28-0.18
-0.10%
DXP Enterprises
TITN23.53-0.33
-1.38%
Titan Machinery
IMDX2.86-0.10
-3.38%
Insight Molecular Diagnostics Inc
ICCM0.86-0.04
-4.77%
Icecure Medical Ltd