MTB
Price
$254.65
Change
+$1.40 (+0.55%)
Updated
Aug 14, 01:07 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
36.57B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RF
Price
$31.75
Change
+$0.09 (+0.28%)
Updated
Aug 14, 01:30 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
26.97B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTB vs RF

MTB vs RF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTB vs. RF commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTB is a Buy and RF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2026
Stock price -- (MTB: $253.25 vs. RF: $31.66)
Brand notoriety: MTB: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTB: 59% vs. RF: 63%
Market capitalization -- MTB: $36.57B vs. RF: $26.97B
MTB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $36.57B. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $26.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MTB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the long-term than MTB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTB is a better buy in the short-term than RF.

Price Growth

MTB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.24% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTB is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2026.

RF is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.83% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTB($36.6B) has a higher market cap than RF($27B). MTB (13.41) and RF (12.87) have similar P/E ratio . MTB YTD gains are higher at: 27.454 vs. RF (19.077). RF has more cash in the bank: 3.45B vs. MTB (1.9B). RF has less debt than MTB: RF (5.14B) vs MTB (19B). MTB has higher revenues than RF: MTB (9.73B) vs RF (7.62B).
MTBRFMTB / RF
Capitalization36.6B27B136%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.45419.077144%
P/E Ratio13.4112.87104%
Revenue9.73B7.62B128%
Total Cash1.9B3.45B55%
Total Debt19B5.14B370%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTB vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
MTB
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8418
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2325
SMR RATING
1..100
810
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2130
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4142
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RF's Valuation (39) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (25) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (10) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's Price Growth Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (30) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (42) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTBRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMR9.850.26
+2.71%
NuScale Power Corp
EXR149.402.64
+1.80%
Extra Space Storage
XCUR1.310.01
+0.77%
Exicure Inc
WW14.45N/A
N/A
WW International Inc
ANL12.86-0.23
-1.76%
Adlai Nortye Ltd

MTB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTB has been closely correlated with RF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTB jumps, then RF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTB
1D Price
Change %
MTB100%
-0.12%
RF - MTB
90%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
FITB - MTB
88%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
CFG - MTB
86%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
USB - MTB
85%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
KEY - MTB
85%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with MTB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then MTB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
+0.19%
MTB - RF
90%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
FITB - RF
90%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
CFG - RF
88%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
TFC - RF
87%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
FNB - RF
86%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
More