CBFV
Price
$36.69
Change
-$1.14 (-3.01%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
193.06M
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBINN
Price
$19.94
Change
-$0.19 (-0.94%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs MBINN

CBFV vs MBINN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. MBINN commentary
Jul 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a Buy and MBINN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 10, 2026
Stock price -- (CBFV: $37.83 vs. MBINN: $20.13)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and MBINN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 11% vs. MBINN: 18%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $193.06M vs. MBINN: $0
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $193.06M. MBINN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMBINN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MBINN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the long-term than MBINN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBINN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MBINN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the short-term than MBINN.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.81% price change this week, while MBINN (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.62% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBINN YTD gains are higher at: 13.748 vs. CBFV (10.227). CBFV has less debt than MBINN: CBFV (34.8M) vs MBINN (4.63B). MBINN has higher revenues than CBFV: MBINN (706M) vs CBFV (44.1M).
CBFVMBINNCBFV / MBINN
Capitalization193MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.22713.74874%
P/E Ratio28.78N/A-
Revenue44.1M706M6%
Total CashN/A19.6M-
Total Debt34.8M4.63B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
92
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11
SMR RATING
1..100
84
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVMBINN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBINN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IGVWX54.82N/A
N/A
Voya Global High Dividend Low Vol W
ARYGX14.92N/A
N/A
American Century Global Real Estate R5
TENWX17.14N/A
N/A
Nuveen Emerging Markets Eq Idx W
VIOAX10.10N/A
N/A
VELA Income Opportunities A
FMPEX34.32N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value C

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
-0.60%
WNEB - CBFV
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
FSBW - CBFV
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
HTB - CBFV
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
CCNE - CBFV
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
MBWM - CBFV
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
More

MBINN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBINN has been loosely correlated with WAFDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBINN jumps, then WAFDP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBINN
1D Price
Change %
MBINN100%
+0.05%
WAFDP - MBINN
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
INBK - MBINN
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
CIVB - MBINN
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
ECBK - MBINN
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
CBFV - MBINN
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
More