CBHC
Price
$28.40
Change
+$2.15 (+8.19%)
Updated
Nov 22 closing price
Capitalization
9.88M
FULT
Price
$17.01
Change
-$0.09 (-0.53%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.57B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBHC vs FULT

Header iconCBHC vs FULT Comparison
Open Charts CBHC vs FULTBanner chart's image
CBC Holding
Price$28.40
Change+$2.15 (+8.19%)
Volume$551
Capitalization9.88M
Fulton Financial
Price$17.01
Change-$0.09 (-0.53%)
Volume$10.14K
Capitalization2.57B
CBHC vs FULT Comparison Chart
Loading...
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBHC vs. FULT commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHC is a Hold and FULT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CBHC: $27.60 vs. FULT: $17.01)
Brand notoriety: CBHC and FULT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBHC: 100% vs. FULT: 53%
Market capitalization -- CBHC: $9.88M vs. FULT: $2.57B
CBHC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $9.88M. FULT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBHC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFULT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBHC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FULT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than CBHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FULT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CBHC (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FULT (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($2.57B) has a higher market cap than CBHC($9.88M). CBHC YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. FULT (-10.416). FULT has higher revenues than CBHC: FULT (1.08B) vs CBHC (4.36M).
CBHCFULTCBHC / FULT
Capitalization9.88M2.57B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-10.416-
P/E RatioN/A9.54-
Revenue4.36M1.08B0%
Total CashN/A304M-
Total DebtN/A1.64B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBHC vs FULT: Fundamental Ratings
CBHC
FULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4758
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1938
SMR RATING
1..100
608
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10055
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBHC's Valuation (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FULT (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CBHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FULT’s over the last 12 months.

CBHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as FULT (38) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CBHC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBHC (60) in the null industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBHC’s over the last 12 months.

CBHC's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as FULT (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CBHC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBHC (100) in the null industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RERFX60.640.41
+0.68%
American Funds EUPAC R5
SPNNX5.910.04
+0.64%
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income R
GSGCX43.65N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Equity Income C
DPRDX12.72N/A
N/A
Macquarie Global Listed Real Assets R6
AVUVX15.90N/A
N/A
Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value Instl

CBHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBHC and FMBL have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBHC and FMBL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBHC
1D Price
Change %
CBHC100%
N/A
FMBL - CBHC
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FULT - CBHC
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
FIEB - CBHC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FKKFY - CBHC
4%
Poorly correlated
-14.45%
PBBK - CBHC
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
More

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with HWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then HWC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
-1.67%
HWC - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
-1.81%
FFBC - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
-1.76%
TRMK - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
ASB - FULT
87%
Closely correlated
-0.94%
BHLB - FULT
87%
Closely correlated
-1.92%
More