Advertisement
CBK vs GGAL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBK is a StrongBuy and GGAL is a StrongBuy.
| CBK | GGAL | CBK / GGAL | |
| Capitalization | 464M | 7.58B | 6% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.914 | -15.355 | -253% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.47 | 124.43 | 9% |
| Revenue | 93.5M | 8.62T | 0% |
| Total Cash | 21.9M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 173M | 3.01T | 0% |
CBK | GGAL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 1 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 39 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 45 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GGAL's Valuation (70) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBK (82) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that GGAL’s stock grew similarly to CBK’s over the last 12 months.
CBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as GGAL (2) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CBK’s stock grew similarly to GGAL’s over the last 12 months.
GGAL's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBK (39) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that GGAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBK’s over the last 12 months.
CBK's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as GGAL (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CBK’s stock grew similarly to GGAL’s over the last 12 months.
GGAL's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBK (21) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that GGAL’s stock grew similarly to CBK’s over the last 12 months.
| CBK | GGAL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 22% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 17% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 14% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 30% | 5 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 78% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while GGAL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- CBK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- GGAL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GGAL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CBK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- GGAL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.67% price change this week, while GGAL (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.22%.
Reported Earning Dates
CBK is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.
GGAL is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.96% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
CBK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CBK and GGAL have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBK and GGAL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBK | 100% | -0.09% | ||
| GGAL - CBK | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.92% | ||
| HDB - CBK | 3% Poorly correlated | +6.87% | ||
| USB - CBK | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.69% | ||
| IBN - CBK | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.87% | ||
| HBCP - CBK | 0% Poorly correlated | -0.36% | ||
More | ||||
GGAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGAL has been closely correlated with BMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GGAL jumps, then BMA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GGAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GGAL | 100% | -1.92% | ||
| BMA - GGAL | 95% Closely correlated | -1.28% | ||
| SUPV - GGAL | 93% Closely correlated | -2.63% | ||
| BBAR - GGAL | 93% Closely correlated | -2.93% | ||
| BCH - GGAL | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| BSAC - GGAL | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
More | ||||