Advertisement
CBRE vs MMI
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CBRE Group (CBRE) vs. Marcus & Millichap (MMI) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CBRE boasts a significantly larger market capitalization of approximately $45 billion compared to MMI's $1.07 billion, reflecting greater scale and global reach.
- CBRE has shown stronger one-year performance at around 30%, outperforming MMI's 9%, amid positive momentum from data center initiatives.
- Both stocks operate in real estate services but CBRE offers diversified services including advisory and investment management, while MMI focuses on brokerage and financing.
- Analyst sentiment leans toward CBRE with "Moderate Buy" ratings and price targets around $175-$178, signaling potential upside.
- Recent technical analysis from Tickeron gives CBRE a stronger score with 6 bullish indicators versus 4 for MMI.
- MMI offers a dividend yield of about 1.8%, providing income appeal absent in CBRE.
Introduction
In the real estate services sector, investors often weigh large-cap global leaders against nimble brokerage specialists. CBRE Group and Marcus & Millichap (MMI) represent contrasting approaches amid recovering transaction volumes and data center demand. Traders seeking momentum plays may eye CBRE's scale, while income-focused investors note MMI's yield. This comparison analyzes recent market positioning, performance trends, and sector dynamics to inform relative performance decisions in today's environment.
CBRE Overview and Recent Performance
CBRE Group, Inc. is a leading global commercial real estate services firm, offering advisory, property management, and investment solutions across segments like leasing, capital markets, and facilities management. With operations in the U.S., U.K., and beyond, it serves diverse clients including institutional investors. In recent market activity, the stock has exhibited upward momentum, gaining over 11% in the past month and trading near $152 with a 52-week range of $116-$174. Year-to-date returns hover around 5%, supported by strong Q4 2025 results including $11.6 billion in revenue and EPS guidance of $7.30-$7.60 for 2026. Sentiment has brightened from partnerships like a Meta collaboration for data center training, alongside analyst upgrades and "Moderate Buy" consensus. Broader recovery in commercial real estate transactions and AI-driven demand have bolstered performance, though high P/E ratios (around 40) reflect growth expectations.
MMI Overview and Recent Performance
Marcus & Millichap, Inc. (MMI) specializes in commercial real estate investment sales, financing, and advisory services, primarily in the U.S. and Canada. It focuses on property types like multifamily and industrial, acting as a brokerage intermediary for owners and investors. Recent weeks have seen modest gains, with shares around $28 in a 52-week range of $24-$34. Year-to-date performance stands at about 3%, lagging broader indices amid mixed transaction volumes. Preliminary Q4 2025 results showed revenue up 8.5% to $756 million annually and adjusted EBITDA rising to $24.6 million, signaling optimism. However, stock returns have been volatile, with some monthly dips, influenced by sector headwinds like softening office demand. A dividend yield near 1.8% supports appeal, but negative EPS (-$0.05 TTM) highlights profitability challenges in cyclical markets.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots that scan thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, and multi-agent systems, with timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 days and average holds of 1-55 days. Standout stats include annualized returns up to 168%, win rates of 54-88%, profit factors to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 22. Focused on volatile sectors like semiconductors and small caps, they trade tickers such as NVDA, AMD, and SOXL. Ideal for current conditions, these bots adapt via AI/ML for technical and fundamental signals—explore them to enhance your trading edge.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CBRE and MMI share real estate services exposure but diverge in scale and models: CBRE's diversified global platform drives growth via data centers and facilities management, contrasting MMI's U.S.-centric brokerage reliant on transaction fees. Recent momentum favors CBRE with superior YTD and one-year gains, bolstered by catalysts like AI infrastructure demand. Risk profiles differ—CBRE (beta 1.35) faces broader economic cycles, while MMI (beta 1.32) amplifies brokerage volatility. Market sentiment tilts to CBRE via higher analyst targets, though MMI offers yield trade-offs in a stabilizing sector.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI tools currently favor CBRE over MMI, driven by a superior technical analysis score (6 bullish vs. 4 indicators) and consistent trend strength amid data center catalysts. CBRE's relative stability and positioning suggest higher probability of near-term outperformance, though both remain sensitive to real estate cycles.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBRE is a Hold and MMI is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBRE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMMI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CBRE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MMI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBRE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CBRE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MMI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CBRE (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -0.27% price change this week, while MMI (@Real Estate Development) price change was -3.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +4.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
CBRE is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
MMI is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Development (+4.26% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| CBRE | MMI | CBRE / MMI | |
| Capitalization | 38.5B | 1.11B | 3,472% |
| EBITDA | 2B | 27.2M | 7,342% |
| Gain YTD | -18.185 | 8.477 | -215% |
| P/E Ratio | 30.03 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 42.2B | 782M | 5,396% |
| Total Cash | 1.66B | 187M | 890% |
| Total Debt | 10.4B | 75M | 13,867% |
CBRE | MMI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MMI's Valuation (77) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CBRE (86). This means that MMI’s stock grew similarly to CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMI (100). This means that CBRE’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMI’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's SMR Rating (56) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMI (92). This means that CBRE’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMI’s over the last 12 months.
MMI's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CBRE (59). This means that MMI’s stock grew similarly to CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
MMI's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBRE (78). This means that MMI’s stock grew significantly faster than CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
| CBRE | MMI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 7 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | 17 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 55% | 7 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 61% |
Advertisement
CBRE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBRE has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBRE jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBRE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBRE | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| JLL - CBRE | 89% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| NMRK - CBRE | 84% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| CWK - CBRE | 83% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| CIGI - CBRE | 71% Closely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| MMI - CBRE | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
More | ||||
MMI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMI has been loosely correlated with CWK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMI jumps, then CWK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MMI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMI | 100% | +1.17% | ||
| CWK - MMI | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| CBRE - MMI | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| JLL - MMI | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| NMRK - MMI | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| FRPH - MMI | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
More | ||||