Commercial real estate (CRE) services firms are often grouped together, yet their business models can differ sharply. This stock comparison examines two publicly traded names at different ends of the spectrum: CBRE, a diversified global leader spanning advisory, facilities, project management, and investment services, and MMI, a specialized brokerage centered on commercial property investment sales and financing. For traders and investors weighing market positioning, relative performance, and exposure to the CRE cycle, understanding these contrasts is essential. Both companies benefit when transaction activity and capital markets improve, but they do so through very different scale, revenue mix, and margin profiles.
CBRE (CBRE Group, Inc.) is the world's largest commercial real estate services and investment company by revenue, headquartered in Dallas and operating across more than 100 countries. Its business spans four segments: Advisory Services (leasing, sales, mortgage services, and valuations), Building Operations & Experience (facilities management and data center solutions), Project Management, and Real Estate Investments. In recent quarters, the company has reported strong momentum. Its latest quarter showed core earnings per share (EPS) rising roughly 30% year over year, with revenue up in the mid-teens, led by record leasing activity, accelerating property sales, and surging demand for critical infrastructure and data center services. Management raised its full-year core EPS outlook, supported by a growing data center backlog and contributions from recent acquisitions. Despite this operational strength, the stock has pulled back in recent weeks, with shares trading below earlier 2026 highs, reflecting broader market caution around interest rates and CRE transaction volumes.
MMI (Marcus & Millichap, Inc.) is a leading national commercial real estate brokerage headquartered in Calabasas, California, specializing in investment sales, financing, research, and advisory services. The company operates a decentralized network of investment sales and financing professionals across more than 80 offices and is particularly strong in the fragmented "private client" market for smaller commercial properties. In its most recent quarter, MMI reported its strongest first-quarter revenue growth in four years, up roughly 18% year over year, driven by a rebound in brokerage commissions and a nearly 50% jump in financing fees. The company narrowed its net loss and turned adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) positive, signaling improving operating leverage. MMI maintains a debt-free balance sheet with substantial cash and has accelerated share repurchases. However, the stock has also experienced near-term volatility, and its five-year total return remains negative, reflecting the cyclical pressure on transaction-driven revenue.
For traders seeking a data-driven edge in this type of stock comparison, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of the platform's most relevant automated trading strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, timeframe, performance statistics, and set of securities. Because not every bot suits every market environment, only the strategies deemed most appropriate for current conditions earn a place in the Trending section. This curation helps users identify bots aligned with prevailing momentum, volatility, and trend patterns across names like CBRE and MMI. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to review the latest featured strategies and their performance metrics.
The most important contrast between these two companies is diversification versus concentration. CBRE generates revenue across leasing, property management, project management, investment management, and a fast-growing data center infrastructure platform, which smooths out reliance on any single transaction type. MMI, by contrast, derives roughly four-fifths of its revenue from brokerage commissions, making it highly sensitive to the pace of property sales and financing activity. This structural difference shapes their risk profiles: CBRE carries modest net leverage but substantial scale and recurring service revenue, while MMI operates debt-free with strong liquidity but thinner, cycle-dependent margins. On growth drivers, CBRE is increasingly tied to secular demand from data centers, power, and technology clients, whereas MMI's growth depends more directly on a cyclical recovery in CRE deal volumes and narrowing bid-ask spreads between buyers and sellers. In terms of market sentiment, CBRE benefits from consistent earnings beats and upward guidance revisions, while MMI's improving but still loss-making results leave its valuation more contested.
Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor CBRE in the current environment. The company exhibits stronger trend consistency, broader revenue diversification, positive and rising earnings, and clearer catalysts tied to data center and infrastructure demand. These characteristics tend to align more reliably with momentum and stability signals than a concentrated, transaction-driven brokerage model. MMI shows encouraging signs of an operational turnaround and carries a clean balance sheet, but its dependence on a sustained recovery in deal volumes introduces greater uncertainty. Accordingly, a probabilistic assessment would tilt toward CBRE for trend-oriented positioning, while recognizing that MMI could offer upside if CRE transaction activity accelerates faster than expected.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The RSI Oscillator for CBRE moved out of oversold territory on October 01, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 29 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 24 of the 29 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 83%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CBRE as a result. In 58 of 80 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CBRE just turned positive on October 12, 2026. Looking at past instances where CBRE's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 28 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
Following a +2.97% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CBRE advanced for three days, in 205 of 316 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 36 of 71 cases where CBRE's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 51%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CBRE declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 55%.
CBRE broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for CBRE entered a downward trend on October 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 60 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CBRE’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 78 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 84 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.525) is normal, around the industry mean (2.177). P/E Ratio (29.827) is within average values for comparable stocks, (55.145). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.695) is also within normal values, averaging (0.683). Dividend Yield (0.001) settles around the average of (0.105) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.944) is also within normal values, averaging (5.807).
MMI may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 31 of 41 cases where MMI's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where MMI's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 21 of 37 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 37 of 65 cases where MMI's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MMI just turned positive on October 20, 2026. Looking at past instances where MMI's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 29 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
Following a +0.89% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MMI advanced for three days, in 188 of 304 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on September 17, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on MMI as a result. In 60 of 92 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 65%.
MMI moved below its 50-day moving average on September 17, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for MMI crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 17, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 11 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 73%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MMI declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 68%.
The Aroon Indicator for MMI entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 52 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 60 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. MMI’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 87 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.850) is normal, around the industry mean (2.177). P/E Ratio (76.432) is within average values for comparable stocks, (55.145). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.480) is also within normal values, averaging (0.683). Dividend Yield (0.035) settles around the average of (0.105) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.479) is also within normal values, averaging (5.807).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 88 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. MMI’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock worse than average.
CBRE | MMI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 52 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CBRE's Valuation (84) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as MMI (87). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to MMI’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMI (100). This means that CBRE’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMI’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's SMR Rating (54) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMI (88). This means that CBRE’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMI’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as MMI (60). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to MMI’s over the last 12 months.
MMI's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CBRE (78). This means that MMI’s stock grew similarly to CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
| CBRE | MMI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 5 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 55% | 5 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 65% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBRE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while MMI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBRE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CBRE (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -3.14% price change this week, while MMI (@Real Estate Development) price change was +0.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.22%.
CBRE is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2027.
MMI is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2026.
Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBRE has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBRE jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBRE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBRE | 100% | -2.53% | ||
| JLL - CBRE | 88% Closely correlated | +2.12% | ||
| CWK - CBRE | 85% Closely correlated | +4.49% | ||
| NMRK - CBRE | 82% Closely correlated | +2.96% | ||
| CIGI - CBRE | 73% Closely correlated | +4.00% | ||
| MMI - CBRE | 68% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
More | ||||