CBRE Group and Jones Lang LaSalle represent two of the largest publicly traded commercial real estate services firms, making them natural subjects for comparison among investors and traders focused on the property sector. This analysis examines their business models, recent stock behavior, and relative positioning in the current market environment. Market participants seeking exposure to real estate services, including those monitoring cyclical recovery themes or sector-specific momentum, may find this side-by-side review useful for understanding key differences and trade-offs.
CBRE Group provides a broad range of commercial real estate services, encompassing leasing, property management, investment sales, and facilities management across multiple geographies. In recent weeks, the stock has traded in a range influenced by broader market sentiment toward real estate and anticipation of its second-quarter earnings release scheduled for July 29. Recent market activity shows the shares closing at $139.46 on July 24, reflecting a year-to-date decline of approximately 13 percent alongside a one-month gain near 4 percent. Analysts project revenue of $11.17 billion and earnings per share of $1.49 for the upcoming quarter, with sentiment shaped by expectations of continued recovery in transaction volumes despite macroeconomic headwinds.
Jones Lang LaSalle delivers similar commercial real estate services, including advisory, leasing, capital markets, and project management, with a significant global footprint. In recent market activity, the stock closed at $325.45 on July 24, posting a modest daily advance. Performance metrics indicate a year-to-date return of roughly 3 percent and a one-year gain exceeding 24 percent, supported by strong first-quarter results that featured substantial earnings growth. The company is set to report second-quarter earnings on July 30, with consensus estimates calling for revenue of $6.87 billion and earnings per share of $4.52. Recent sentiment has benefited from positive momentum in leasing activity and capital markets execution.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page highlights select AI trading bots from a large collection of hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this curated section. Available bots span a wide array of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance statistics, and ticker sets, with many exhibiting varying win rates, drawdowns, and return profiles depending on their parameters. This diversity allows users to explore options aligned with different risk tolerances and market outlooks. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for additional details.
CBRE Group and Jones Lang LaSalle share core business models centered on fee-based real estate services, yet differ in scale and market emphasis. CBRE generally maintains a larger revenue base and broader service integration, while Jones Lang LaSalle has demonstrated stronger recent share-price momentum and one-year returns. Both face similar growth drivers tied to commercial leasing volumes, investment sales, and property management fees, though exposure to office and industrial segments can vary. Risk factors include sensitivity to interest-rate fluctuations, economic slowdowns affecting transaction activity, and competition within the services sector. Recent momentum favors Jones Lang LaSalle on a trailing twelve-month basis, while CBRE’s positioning reflects a more pronounced year-to-date pullback amid sector-wide pressures. Market sentiment for both remains linked to earnings visibility and capital-markets trends.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to Jones Lang LaSalle due to its stronger one-year performance and more favorable recent return profile compared with CBRE Group. Both stocks face upcoming earnings events that could alter short-term dynamics, and broader sector catalysts remain influential. This assessment reflects measurable data patterns rather than forward-looking certainty.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBRE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJLL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBRE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JLL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CBRE (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +10.26% price change this week, while JLL (@Real Estate Development) price change was +13.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.27%.
CBRE is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
JLL is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| CBRE | JLL | CBRE / JLL | |
| Capitalization | 43.3B | 16.8B | 258% |
| EBITDA | 2B | 1.48B | 135% |
| Gain YTD | -7.046 | 7.504 | -94% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.20 | 17.35 | 197% |
| Revenue | 42.2B | 26.8B | 157% |
| Total Cash | 1.66B | 436M | 382% |
| Total Debt | 10.4B | 3.98B | 262% |
CBRE | JLL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 45 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CBRE's Valuation (88) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as JLL (88). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to JLL’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as JLL (45). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to JLL’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's SMR Rating (56) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as JLL (72). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to JLL’s over the last 12 months.
JLL's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CBRE (51). This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as JLL (83). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to JLL’s over the last 12 months.
| CBRE | JLL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 54% | 8 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 66% |