Advertisement
CBRE vs JLL
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CBRE Group (CBRE) vs. Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CBRE is the world's largest commercial real estate services firm with a market capitalization roughly three times that of JLL, reflecting its broader scale and more diversified revenue base.
- Both companies are riding a commercial real estate recovery, with strong leasing and capital-markets momentum, though CBRE has a larger data-center revenue engine.
- JLL carries a lower net leverage ratio and has completed a large share repurchase program, supporting earnings per share (EPS) growth.
- CBRE has raised its full-year guidance on resilient and transactional growth, while JLL is emphasizing margin expansion and its technology and artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities.
- Relative performance has favored both names at different points, but their risk profiles differ across transaction cyclicality, sector exposure, and balance-sheet positioning.
Introduction
Investors evaluating commercial real estate services often encounter the same two heavyweight names: CBRE (CBRE Group, Inc.) and JLL (Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated). Both operate global platforms spanning leasing, capital markets, property and facilities management, and investment management, and both are closely tied to the health of the office, industrial, and data-center sectors. This stock comparison is relevant for traders and long-term investors seeking to understand relative performance, market positioning, and the factors that could drive one name ahead of the other as the commercial real estate cycle recovers. The analysis below weighs recent business momentum, balance-sheet strength, and observable catalysts without favoring either company by wording alone.
CBRE Overview and Recent Performance
CBRE is the largest commercial real estate services and investment firm globally, serving clients across advisory, facilities management, project management, and real estate investment management. In recent quarters, the company has benefited from a broad-based recovery in leasing and property sales. Its most recent reported quarter showed revenue up roughly 14% year over year, with core EPS growing by double digits, and management raised its full-year core EPS guidance. A notable driver has been data centers, where revenue has grown sharply year over year and now represents a meaningful share of profitability. CBRE also continues to integrate recent acquisitions and monetize development assets, supporting free cash flow and a conservative net leverage ratio near 1.2x. Investor sentiment has been supported by consistent earnings beats and market-share gains in resilient, recurring service lines.
JLL Overview and Recent Performance
JLL is a global commercial real estate and investment management company whose platform spans real estate management services, leasing advisory, capital markets, investment management, and a software and technology solutions business. In its most recent reported quarter, JLL posted revenue growth of about 11% year over year and a strong rise in adjusted EPS, with transactional businesses reaccelerating alongside resilient workplace and project management lines. The company has also highlighted eight consecutive quarters of double-digit adjusted EPS growth. On the balance sheet, JLL operates with a notably low net leverage ratio near 0.8x and has executed a multi-year share repurchase program that has materially reduced its share count. Management has emphasized margin expansion, disciplined capital allocation, and the integration of data, technology, and AI capabilities across its core businesses.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots section featuring only the AI trading bots best suited to current market conditions. Across the platform, Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, yet only a select group earns placement among the trending robots. These bots differ widely in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance statistics, and the sets of tickers they monitor, which can include names such as CBRE and JLL. By filtering for consistent, data-driven signals rather than one-off calls, the Trending AI Robots page helps traders identify systems whose approaches align with prevailing volatility and trend conditions. Exploring the page is a practical starting point for those who want to complement fundamental research with quantitative, algorithm-driven signals.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The clearest contrast between these two stocks is scale versus focus. CBRE generates materially higher revenue and holds a dominant position in several service lines, giving it an information and cost advantage, but also exposing it more heavily to large, lower-margin contracts and pass-through revenue. JLL is smaller but has leaned into higher-margin workplace and project management services and a proprietary technology stack, which supports margin-expansion ambitions. On growth drivers, CBRE has a larger, faster-growing data-center franchise, while JLL emphasizes recurring outsourcing revenue and AI-enabled productivity. Risk profiles also differ: both remain sensitive to transaction volumes and office demand, but JLL's lower leverage and completed buyback provide a cushion, whereas CBRE's greater scale offers resilience across cycles. Market sentiment toward both has improved with the sector recovery, though their relative momentum has shifted as each reported earnings and updated guidance.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, balance-sheet strength, and the mix of catalysts, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward CBRE for its breadth, scale-driven resilience, and outsized data-center exposure, which provides a secular growth tailwind alongside the cyclical recovery. At the same time, JLL's lower leverage, disciplined capital returns, and margin-expansion story make it a compelling counterpart, particularly for investors focused on profitability improvement rather than pure revenue scale. The AI's preference is probabilistic rather than definitive, reflecting the reality that both companies are positioned to benefit from a recovering commercial real estate market while carrying distinct risk and reward profiles.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
CBRE Group (CBRE) and Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) are companies specializing in real estate services. This includes consulting servicing for other large companies regarding commercial space, equity and debt placement, as well as consulting and advisory services for investment managers seeking real estate investments, and assistance with mergers and acquisitions. These companies are much like the investment bankers of the real estate world. CBRE is nearly 3x larger than JLL, but, with an enterprise value of approximately $14B, Jones Lang LaSalle is not exactly small potatoes. Both companies have strong return on equity numbers, with CBRE looking slightly better, and they also both look strong with their enterprise value to revenue statistics, but with JLL winning that comparison. JLL has a stronger-looking earnings per share and diluted earnings per share. It is notable that these companies are not REITs
CBRE's RSI Indicator ascending out of oversold territory
The RSI Oscillator for CBRE moved out of oversold territory on October 01, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 26 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 19 of the 26 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 73%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 32 of 50 cases where CBRE's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CBRE just turned positive on October 30, 2026. Looking at past instances where CBRE's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 28 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
Following a +4.16% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CBRE advanced for three days, in 205 of 315 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
CBRE may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 23, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on CBRE as a result. In 42 of 81 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 52%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CBRE declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 55%.
The Aroon Indicator for CBRE entered a downward trend on October 30, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 60 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CBRE’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 62 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 81 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 83 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.443) is normal, around the industry mean (2.065). P/E Ratio (29.284) is within average values for comparable stocks, (53.559). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.695) is also within normal values, averaging (0.683). Dividend Yield (0.001) settles around the average of (0.105) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.944) is also within normal values, averaging (5.807).
JLL's MACD Histogram just turned positive
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for JLL turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where JLL's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 36 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 19, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on JLL as a result. In 50 of 73 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
JLL moved above its 50-day moving average on October 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +7.94% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where JLL advanced for three days, in 208 of 319 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where JLL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 68%.
JLL broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 28, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for JLL entered a downward trend on October 16, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 41 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. JLL’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 80 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.218) is normal, around the industry mean (2.065). P/E Ratio (16.931) is within average values for comparable stocks, (53.559). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.650) is also within normal values, averaging (0.683). Dividend Yield (0.005) settles around the average of (0.105) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.593) is also within normal values, averaging (5.807).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 82 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 88 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
CBRE | JLL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 57 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
JLL's Valuation (80) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CBRE (83). This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
JLL's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CBRE (62). This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's SMR Rating (54) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JLL (88). This means that CBRE’s stock grew somewhat faster than JLL’s over the last 12 months.
JLL's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CBRE (60). This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as JLL (82). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to JLL’s over the last 12 months.
| CBRE | JLL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 55% | 14 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 75% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBRE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while JLL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CBRE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- JLL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBRE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JLL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CBRE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- JLL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CBRE (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +4.50% price change this week, while JLL (@Real Estate Development) price change was +19.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -3.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.02%.
Reported Earning Dates
CBRE is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2027.
JLL is expected to report earnings on Mar 02, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Development (-3.03% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
Advertisement
JLL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JLL has been closely correlated with CBRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JLL jumps, then CBRE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JLL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JLL | 100% | +1.79% | ||
| CBRE - JLL | 85% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| CWK - JLL | 81% Closely correlated | +1.45% | ||
| MMI - JLL | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| AGNT - JLL | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.51% | ||
| COMP - JLL | 48% Loosely correlated | -4.15% | ||
More | ||||