Advertisement
CBRE vs JLL
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CBRE Group (CBRE) vs. Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CBRE Group (CBRE) and Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) are leading commercial real estate services firms with overlapping business models in brokerage, leasing, and advisory.
- Recent market activity shows JLL delivering stronger year-to-date and one-year returns compared with CBRE, supported by robust quarterly earnings beats.
- CBRE reported solid Q1 2026 results with revenue growth of 19% and raised full-year core EPS guidance, reflecting resilience in its transactional and resilient businesses.
- JLL posted record Q2 2026 diluted EPS of $4.59 (up 100% year-over-year) and raised full-year adjusted EPS guidance, driving recent all-time highs in its share price.
- Market sentiment favors JLL in the short term due to momentum and earnings momentum, while CBRE offers scale advantages with higher revenues and EBITDA.
- Both stocks trade in a recovering commercial real estate environment, with relative performance influenced by leasing volumes, capital markets activity, and broader economic conditions.
Introduction
Commercial real estate services companies CBRE Group (CBRE) and Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) provide comparable exposure to global property markets through brokerage, property management, and advisory services. This comparison examines their recent stock behavior, earnings trends, and market positioning to assist investors and traders evaluating relative value within the sector. The analysis draws on verifiable developments from the past several weeks and broader performance metrics, offering insights relevant to those seeking to understand competitive dynamics in a cyclical industry.
CBRE Overview and Recent Performance
CBRE Group (CBRE) is the world’s largest commercial real estate services and investment firm, generating revenue across leasing, capital markets, property management, and valuation services. In recent weeks, the stock has shown modest gains amid sector recovery signals, with a closing price near $152.86 as of August 14, 2026. Earlier Q1 2026 results highlighted revenue of $10.53 billion (up 19% year-over-year) and core EPS of $1.61 (up 81%), prompting management to raise 2026 core EPS guidance to $7.60–$7.80. Sentiment has been supported by resilient business segments and share repurchases, though year-to-date returns remain mixed relative to broader indices. Recent market activity reflects positioning ahead of Q2 earnings and improving transaction volumes in commercial real estate.
JLL Overview and Recent Performance
Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) operates as a leading provider of real estate and investment management services, with strengths in leasing, capital markets, facilities management, and project development. The stock has demonstrated stronger recent momentum, reaching all-time highs near $373 and closing around $369.52 as of mid-August 2026. Q2 2026 results delivered record diluted EPS of $4.59 (up 100% year-over-year) and adjusted diluted EPS of $5.26 (up 59%), exceeding estimates and leading to raised full-year guidance. Year-to-date performance has outpaced many peers, with gains approaching double digits in some measures. Sentiment has benefited from robust leasing and capital markets activity, alongside ongoing share repurchases that completed a multi-year buyback program.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the most suitable AI trading bots for prevailing market conditions from a library of hundreds of bots that trade thousands of different tickers. Only those demonstrating strong alignment with current trends, volatility patterns, and performance statistics earn placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and ticker sets, with historical win rates, profit factors, and drawdown metrics varying by bot. This diversity allows users to explore automated approaches tailored to specific market environments. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed statistics and live performance data.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CBRE Group (CBRE) maintains a larger scale, with higher annual revenues (approximately $43.7 billion) and EBITDA compared with Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL). Both firms derive growth from commercial real estate transaction volumes and outsourcing demand, yet JLL has posted more consistent recent momentum and favorable one-year returns. Risk factors include exposure to economic cycles affecting leasing and investment activity for each. CBRE carries higher debt levels but benefits from greater cash reserves, while JLL exhibits a lower price-to-earnings ratio. Sector sentiment has tilted toward JLL amid stronger earnings surprises and price appreciation, creating a trade-off between CBRE’s size advantages and JLL’s recent relative outperformance in returns and technical positioning.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, stability, catalysts, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) due to its stronger one-year performance and more favorable recent return profile compared with CBRE Group (CBRE). This assessment reflects recent earnings momentum and price behavior rather than a guarantee of future results.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
CBRE Group (CBRE) and Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) are companies specializing in real estate services. This includes consulting servicing for other large companies regarding commercial space, equity and debt placement, as well as consulting and advisory services for investment managers seeking real estate investments, and assistance with mergers and acquisitions. These companies are much like the investment bankers of the real estate world. CBRE is nearly 3x larger than JLL, but, with an enterprise value of approximately $14B, Jones Lang LaSalle is not exactly small potatoes. Both companies have strong return on equity numbers, with CBRE looking slightly better, and they also both look strong with their enterprise value to revenue statistics, but with JLL winning that comparison. JLL has a stronger-looking earnings per share and diluted earnings per share. It is notable that these companies are not REITs
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBRE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJLL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CBRE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- JLL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBRE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JLL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CBRE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- JLL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CBRE (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +5.20% price change this week, while JLL (@Real Estate Development) price change was +7.57% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
CBRE is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
JLL is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Development (+0.55% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| CBRE | JLL | CBRE / JLL | |
| Capitalization | 44.9B | 18B | 249% |
| EBITDA | 2.05B | 1.57B | 130% |
| Gain YTD | -3.557 | 15.972 | -22% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.49 | 18.72 | 190% |
| Revenue | 43.7B | 27.4B | 159% |
| Total Cash | 1.49B | 458M | 325% |
| Total Debt | 10.6B | 3.22B | 329% |
CBRE | JLL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 45 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CBRE's Valuation (90) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as JLL (90). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to JLL’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as JLL (45). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to JLL’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's SMR Rating (55) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as JLL (66). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to JLL’s over the last 12 months.
JLL's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CBRE (50). This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as JLL (81). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to JLL’s over the last 12 months.
| CBRE | JLL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 49% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | 7 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 14 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 67% |
Advertisement
CBRE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBRE has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBRE jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBRE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBRE | 100% | +5.27% | ||
| JLL - CBRE | 88% Closely correlated | +5.17% | ||
| CWK - CBRE | 85% Closely correlated | +8.55% | ||
| NMRK - CBRE | 84% Closely correlated | +8.17% | ||
| CIGI - CBRE | 72% Closely correlated | +4.73% | ||
| MMI - CBRE | 67% Closely correlated | +3.70% | ||
More | ||||