Advertisement
CBRE vs NMRK
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CBRE Group (CBRE) vs. Newmark Group (NMRK) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CBRE commands a significantly larger market capitalization of approximately $45 billion compared to NMRK's $4.2 billion, underscoring its dominant scale in commercial real estate services.
- Both stocks have delivered modest year-to-date gains around 5%, reflecting resilience in the real estate services sector amid stabilizing market conditions.
- NMRK has outperformed CBRE over the past 12 months, with returns of +64% versus +31%, driven by deal activity and international expansion.
- Analyst price targets indicate solid upside: about 15% for CBRE (to $176) and 17% for NMRK (to $19), with both rated overweight.
- CBRE offers lower volatility (beta of 1.35) than NMRK (1.83), where beta measures a stock's sensitivity to market movements.
- Recent sector outlooks from both firms project gradual recovery in U.S. commercial real estate for 2026, supporting leasing and investment activity.
Introduction
CBRE Group (CBRE) and Newmark Group (NMRK) are leading players in the commercial real estate services industry, offering advisory, brokerage, and management solutions amid a sector navigating post-pandemic recovery and economic shifts. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors and traders seeking exposure to real estate without direct property ownership, as both firms benefit from trends like data center demand and international leasing. With stabilizing fundamentals projected for 2026, understanding their relative performance, growth drivers, and risk profiles aids in evaluating opportunities in this cyclical market.
CBRE Overview and Recent Performance
CBRE Group, Inc. is a global leader in commercial real estate services, operating through segments like Advisory Services (leasing and sales), Global Workplace Solutions (facilities management), and Real Estate Investments. The company provides valuation, mortgage brokerage, and project management across key markets. In recent market activity, CBRE stock has traded within its 52-week range of $117 to $174, posting year-to-date gains of about 5%. Sentiment has been bolstered by partnerships addressing data center labor needs and positive analyst updates ahead of quarterly earnings. Broader sector resilience, including expected investment volume growth, has supported steady price behavior despite occasional volatility from macroeconomic factors.
NMRK Overview and Recent Performance
Newmark Group, Inc. delivers commercial real estate advisory and services, including capital markets (investment sales and mortgage brokerage), leasing, and occupier solutions, with a footprint in the U.S., U.K., Asia, and Europe. Recent weeks have seen robust activity for NMRK, highlighted by high-profile deals like a $525 million refinancing and a $210 million property sale, alongside strategic hires in Asia and infrastructure capital markets. The stock, ranging from $10 to $20 over 52 weeks, mirrors sector peers with roughly 5% year-to-date appreciation and stronger intraday gains in volatile sessions. Expansion into high-growth areas like South Korea has fueled positive momentum.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes from 5 minutes to 55 days, and sectors like semiconductors, finance, and energy. These bots showcase impressive stats, including annualized returns up to +168%, win rates from 54% to 88%, and profit factors reaching 11.7, tailored to current volatility levels (low, medium, high). Selected for superior risk-adjusted performance in recent market conditions, they employ swing trading, trend following, and multi-agent approaches with take-profit/stop-loss corridors. Traders can explore these automated tools to enhance strategies amid fluctuating conditions.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both CBRE and NMRK operate in real estate services, but CBRE’s diversified segments provide broader global exposure, while NMRK emphasizes capital markets and emerging regions like Asia. Growth drivers differ: CBRE leverages workplace solutions and data centers, versus NMRK’s infrastructure and leasing deals. Recent momentum favors NMRK with superior 12-month returns, though CBRE shows greater stability (lower beta, PE ratio (price-to-earnings) of 40 vs. 24). Risk factors include sector cyclicality and interest rate sensitivity, with NMRK facing higher volatility. Market sentiment remains constructive for both amid 2026 recovery projections.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors NMRK for its stronger recent momentum, including superior 12-month outperformance and catalysts like Asian expansion and deal flow, positioning it well relative to peers. While CBRE offers scale and stability, NMRK’s growth trajectory and comparable analyst upside suggest higher probabilistic near-term potential in a recovering sector.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBRE is a StrongBuy and NMRK is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBRE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNMRK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CBRE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NMRK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBRE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMRK’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CBRE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NMRK’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CBRE (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +4.71% price change this week, while NMRK (@Real Estate Development) price change was +4.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -4.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -21.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
CBRE is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
NMRK is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Development (-4.05% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| CBRE | NMRK | CBRE / NMRK | |
| Capitalization | 38.3B | 2.61B | 1,469% |
| EBITDA | 2B | 460M | 434% |
| Gain YTD | -18.571 | -15.240 | 122% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.89 | 18.13 | 165% |
| Revenue | 42.2B | 3.48B | 1,214% |
| Total Cash | 1.66B | 212M | 785% |
| Total Debt | 10.4B | 2.46B | 422% |
CBRE | NMRK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 49 | 86 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NMRK's Valuation (15) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBRE (86). This means that NMRK’s stock grew significantly faster than CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMRK (86). This means that CBRE’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMRK’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's SMR Rating (56) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NMRK (72). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to NMRK’s over the last 12 months.
NMRK's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CBRE (61). This means that NMRK’s stock grew similarly to CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NMRK (87). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to NMRK’s over the last 12 months.
| CBRE | NMRK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 55% | 11 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
CBRE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBRE has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBRE jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBRE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBRE | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| JLL - CBRE | 89% Closely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| NMRK - CBRE | 83% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| CWK - CBRE | 83% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| CIGI - CBRE | 72% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| MMI - CBRE | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||