Comparing CBRE and NMRK is a study in scale versus speed within the commercial real estate services industry. Both companies operate at the intersection of property markets, capital flows, and corporate occupancy trends, yet they serve investors and traders with markedly different value propositions. CBRE Group brings the weight of being the industry's largest player—diversified, globally entrenched, and buttressed by stable recurring revenue streams. Newmark Group has carved out a reputation as a nimble challenger, posting rapid organic growth and expanding its international footprint. For investors evaluating exposure to the commercial real estate cycle, understanding how these two firms differ in business mix, momentum, and market positioning is essential.
CBRE Group, Inc. is the world's largest commercial real estate services and investment firm, operating across advisory services, building operations and experience (facilities management), project management, and real estate investments. The company serves clients in over 100 countries and manages approximately $155 billion in assets under management (AUM). In its most recently reported full year (2025), CBRE generated roughly $40.6 billion in revenue, representing a 13.4% increase year-over-year, while core earnings per share (EPS) climbed 25.1% to $6.38.
Recent market activity has seen CBRE shares trade within a wide 52-week range of approximately $122 to $174, with the stock experiencing notable pressure in recent months alongside broader market rotation. Year-to-date the stock has pulled back roughly 12%, though it remains near flat on a trailing one-year basis. The company's "resilient" business lines—including facilities management, property management, and investment servicing—have continued posting double-digit revenue gains, providing stability even as transactional businesses fluctuate with market sentiment. CBRE's data center solutions business has emerged as a standout growth engine, with revenues growing more than 20% and expected to reach $2 billion in 2026. Management has guided for 2026 core EPS of $7.30 to $7.60, implying approximately 17% growth at the midpoint. The company's free cash flow generation approached $1.7 billion in 2025, and its net leverage ratio of 1.24x remains conservative relative to its debt covenant of 4.25x.
NMRK (Newmark Group, Inc.) is a full-service commercial real estate advisory firm that has rapidly ascended the industry ranks through strategic talent acquisition, technology investment, and international expansion. Founded in 1929 and now operating from approximately 175 offices with more than 9,300 professionals across four continents, Newmark generated nearly $3.3 billion in total revenues for full-year 2025—a 20.3% increase over the prior year. Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) rose 26.3% to $562.4 million, while adjusted EPS reached $1.62, up 31.7%.
Newmark's recent momentum has been broad-based. Capital markets revenues surged 19.2% in the fourth quarter alone, marking a ninth consecutive quarter of double-digit growth in that segment. The company's servicing and asset management portfolio reached a record $211.2 billion, and leasing fees climbed 13.6% to an all-time quarterly high. A key differentiator has been Newmark's ability to outpace industry growth rates: its investment sales volumes rose 56% in 2025, significantly exceeding broader market activity. The company has also been expanding internationally, opening offices in France, Germany, Singapore, India, South Korea, and the UAE since early 2024, while acquiring RealFoundations to bolster its consulting and managed services capabilities. Looking ahead, Newmark's 2026 guidance calls for total revenues between $3.7 billion and $3.8 billion and adjusted EPS of $1.82 to $1.92, reflecting continued double-digit growth expectations.
For traders seeking a data-driven edge in stock selection, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated window into algorithmic trading. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that actively trade thousands of different tickers, spanning diverse strategies, timeframes, and risk profiles. However, only a select group—those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions—earn placement in the Trending AI Robots section. These featured bots are designed with varying approaches: some emphasize short-term momentum, others focus on trend-following on longer timeframes, and many specialize in specific sectors or patterns. Performance statistics such as win rates, annualized returns, and trade frequency ranges are available for each bot, enabling users to evaluate which automated strategies may complement their own research. Whether you are monitoring CBRE, NMRK, or hundreds of other equities, exploring the Trending AI Robots can help identify which algorithmic approaches are currently resonating with the market.
The most immediate contrast between CBRE and NMRK is scale. CBRE generated over $40 billion in 2025 revenue versus NMRK's $3.3 billion, a difference that reflects CBRE's dominance in facilities management, project management, and investment management—segments where Newmark is still building its capabilities. CBRE's sheer size provides diversification benefits: its "resilient" revenue lines, which include property and facilities management, account for a significant portion of total revenue and tend to be less cyclical than transactional businesses such as sales and leasing.
Newmark, however, has delivered superior top-line growth rates. Its 20.3% revenue expansion in 2025 outpaced CBRE's 13.4%, driven largely by capital markets share gains and leasing productivity improvements. Newmark's adjusted EBITDA margin also expanded meaningfully—by approximately 100 basis points—reflecting operating leverage as the business scales. In contrast, CBRE's margins are more mature but benefit from a wider competitive moat.
Risk profiles differ notably. CBRE's larger balance sheet (with $5.68 billion in total liquidity and net leverage of 1.24x) provides a cushion against market downturns. Newmark operates with a leaner capital structure but has demonstrated strong free cash flow conversion, with trailing twelve-month adjusted free cash flow reaching $268.9 million in 2025. Sector exposure is another differentiating factor: CBRE's growing data center solutions business positions it to benefit from secular tailwinds in artificial intelligence and cloud computing infrastructure, while Newmark's heavier tilt toward capital markets makes it more sensitive to interest rate movements and credit conditions.
Based on observable trend dynamics, relative momentum, and business model characteristics, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely lean toward CBRE for stability-oriented positioning while acknowledging NMRK's stronger near-term growth trajectory. CBRE's combination of diversified revenue streams, sector-leading scale in resilient businesses, and a compelling data center growth narrative provides a more consistent fundamental backdrop—attributes that algorithmic trend-following models tend to favor when market volatility is elevated. Newmark's higher growth rate and margin expansion story are compelling catalysts, but the company's smaller market capitalization and greater sensitivity to capital markets cycles introduce additional variability. In probabilistic terms, CBRE currently presents the steadier trend profile, though both stocks offer distinct appeal depending on whether an investor prioritizes defensive positioning or growth acceleration. As always, market conditions can shift, and real-time AI analysis through platforms like Tickeron can help traders stay attuned to changing signals.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBRE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNMRK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBRE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMRK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CBRE (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -5.66% price change this week, while NMRK (@Real Estate Development) price change was -5.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -21.55%.
CBRE is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
NMRK is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| CBRE | NMRK | CBRE / NMRK | |
| Capitalization | 39.7B | 2.67B | 1,486% |
| EBITDA | 2B | 460M | 434% |
| Gain YTD | -15.697 | -12.687 | 124% |
| P/E Ratio | 30.95 | 18.57 | 167% |
| Revenue | 42.2B | 3.48B | 1,214% |
| Total Cash | 1.66B | 212M | 785% |
| Total Debt | 10.4B | 2.46B | 422% |
CBRE | NMRK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 85 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 71 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NMRK's Valuation (14) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBRE (89). This means that NMRK’s stock grew significantly faster than CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMRK (85). This means that CBRE’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMRK’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's SMR Rating (56) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NMRK (71). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to NMRK’s over the last 12 months.
NMRK's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CBRE (59). This means that NMRK’s stock grew similarly to CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NMRK (92). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to NMRK’s over the last 12 months.
| CBRE | NMRK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 65% | 9 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 78% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DFEN | 74.79 | 6.45 | +9.44% |
| Direxion Dly Aerospace&Def Bl 3X ShsETF | |||
| IREZ | 22.33 | 0.75 | +3.48% |
| Tradr 2X Short Iren Daily ETF | |||
| FUTY | 59.50 | 0.27 | +0.46% |
| Fidelity MSCI Utilities ETF | |||
| CGUI | 25.34 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF | |||
| DSTX | 33.66 | -0.31 | -0.91% |
| Distillate Intntnl Fndmntl Stblty&Vl ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBRE has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBRE jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBRE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBRE | 100% | -1.12% | ||
| JLL - CBRE | 89% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| NMRK - CBRE | 84% Closely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| CWK - CBRE | 82% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| CIGI - CBRE | 72% Closely correlated | -3.95% | ||
| MMI - CBRE | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMRK has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NMRK jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NMRK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMRK | 100% | -1.89% | ||
| JLL - NMRK | 82% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| CIGI - NMRK | 68% Closely correlated | -3.95% | ||
| MMI - NMRK | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| AGNT - NMRK | 55% Loosely correlated | -9.58% | ||
| RMAX - NMRK | 47% Loosely correlated | -9.67% | ||
More | ||||