Advertisement
CBRE vs NMRK
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CBRE Group (CBRE) vs. Newmark Group (NMRK) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CBRE Group operates at significantly larger scale with diversified real estate services including facilities management, while Newmark Group focuses primarily on commercial brokerage and advisory with higher recent revenue growth rates.
- Both companies have exposure to data center and infrastructure projects, contributing to resilient performance amid commercial real estate market recovery in recent weeks.
- CBRE reported strong Q1 2026 results with revenue growth of 19% and raised its full-year core EPS outlook, while Newmark beat Q1 estimates with 27% revenue growth and positive analyst revisions.
- Recent market activity shows both stocks with positive year-to-date returns, though CBRE trades at a premium valuation reflecting its market position and Newmark offers a dividend yield.
- Sector sentiment remains supported by transactional recovery and demand for alternative assets, with both firms scheduled to report Q2 2026 earnings on July 29.
- Relative positioning highlights trade-offs between CBRE’s stability and international reach versus Newmark’s agility and growth momentum in brokerage segments.
Introduction
CBRE Group and Newmark Group represent two prominent players in the commercial real estate services sector, making their stock comparison relevant for investors and traders seeking exposure to property markets, transaction activity, and infrastructure-related opportunities. This analysis examines their business models, recent performance trends, and market positioning in the current environment. Professional and retail investors monitoring real estate cycles, earnings catalysts, or relative value within the sector may find the head-to-head evaluation useful for portfolio construction or tactical decisions. The focus remains on verifiable developments and observable metrics rather than forward projections.
CBRE Overview and Recent Performance
CBRE Group is a leading global provider of real estate services, encompassing advisory, facilities management, project management, and investment management. Its scale includes substantial operations in resilient segments such as data centers and infrastructure assets. In recent weeks, the stock has reflected steady investor interest tied to Q1 2026 results that showed revenue rising 19% year-over-year alongside core EPS growth and an upward revision to the 2026 core EPS outlook. Market activity has been influenced by broader commercial real estate recovery signals and demand for alternative assets, supporting relative performance versus the broader market in recent periods. Share repurchases have also featured in recent corporate activity, signaling management confidence in the company’s trajectory.
NMRK Overview and Recent Performance
Newmark Group specializes in commercial real estate brokerage, advisory services, and debt placement, with growing involvement in property and project management. The firm has demonstrated notable revenue expansion in recent quarters, including 27% growth in Q1 2026 that exceeded expectations. Recent market activity has been shaped by analyst upgrades, positive earnings revisions, and exposure to high-growth areas such as data center financing. The stock has posted solid year-to-date returns amid sector stabilization, supported by management actions including talent acquisition and facility expansions. With Q2 2026 results anticipated shortly, sentiment reflects ongoing focus on transactional momentum and operational leverage in brokerage lines.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated selection of AI trading bots on its Trending AI Robots page. The platform offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers across equities, with only the strongest performers suited to prevailing market conditions featured in the trending section. Available bots exhibit varied trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance histories, and ticker universes, allowing users to review detailed statistics and backtested results. This diversity enables evaluation of different risk-reward profiles and market exposures. Investors interested in algorithmic approaches may explore the page to identify bots aligned with specific objectives.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CBRE Group and Newmark Group both operate within commercial real estate services yet differ markedly in scale and emphasis. CBRE delivers comprehensive global capabilities with significant facilities management revenue, providing greater stability through diversified recurring streams, while Newmark concentrates on brokerage and advisory with demonstrated higher percentage revenue growth in recent periods. Growth drivers for CBRE include infrastructure and data center projects alongside international reach, whereas Newmark benefits from debt platform expansion and targeted market share gains. Recent momentum has favored both amid transactional recovery, though CBRE’s larger market capitalization contributes to lower volatility relative to Newmark’s more agile profile. Risk factors include macroeconomic sensitivity for transaction volumes in both cases, with Newmark carrying additional exposure tied to its smaller size and dividend policy. Sector sentiment appears constructive for infrastructure-related activity, positioning the larger, more established CBRE with defensive characteristics and Newmark with potential for amplified upside in favorable brokerage environments.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent market activity, earnings stability, and positioning within resilient segments, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference toward CBRE for its demonstrated scale and diversified revenue base. Newmark’s higher growth trajectory and analyst support present a compelling alternative in scenarios emphasizing momentum. The assessment reflects relative positioning rather than certainty and remains subject to incoming earnings data and broader market conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBRE is a Buy and NMRK is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBRE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNMRK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CBRE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NMRK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBRE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMRK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CBRE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- NMRK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CBRE (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +3.01% price change this week, while NMRK (@Real Estate Development) price change was +1.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.05%.
Reported Earning Dates
CBRE is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
NMRK is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Development (+0.62% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| CBRE | NMRK | CBRE / NMRK | |
| Capitalization | 44B | 2.77B | 1,586% |
| EBITDA | 2.05B | 460M | 445% |
| Gain YTD | -5.535 | -11.237 | 49% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.76 | 19.13 | 182% |
| Revenue | 43.7B | 3.48B | 1,258% |
| Total Cash | 1.49B | 212M | 702% |
| Total Debt | 10.6B | 2.46B | 431% |
CBRE | NMRK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | 71 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NMRK's Valuation (13) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBRE (88). This means that NMRK’s stock grew significantly faster than CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMRK (79). This means that CBRE’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMRK’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's SMR Rating (55) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NMRK (71). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to NMRK’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NMRK (59). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to NMRK’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NMRK (97). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to NMRK’s over the last 12 months.
| CBRE | NMRK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 54% | 8 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
CBRE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBRE has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBRE jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBRE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBRE | 100% | +3.05% | ||
| JLL - CBRE | 88% Closely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| CWK - CBRE | 84% Closely correlated | +4.06% | ||
| NMRK - CBRE | 84% Closely correlated | +3.24% | ||
| CIGI - CBRE | 72% Closely correlated | +4.89% | ||
| MMI - CBRE | 67% Closely correlated | +2.02% | ||
More | ||||
NMRK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMRK has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NMRK jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NMRK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMRK | 100% | +3.24% | ||
| JLL - NMRK | 82% Closely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| CIGI - NMRK | 67% Closely correlated | +4.89% | ||
| MMI - NMRK | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.02% | ||
| AGNT - NMRK | 57% Loosely correlated | +5.14% | ||
| COMP - NMRK | 50% Loosely correlated | +4.87% | ||
More | ||||