Advertisement
CCHBF vs KDP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCHBF is a Hold and KDP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCHBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKDP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CCHBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- KDP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCHBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KDP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCHBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KDP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CCHBF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -1.57% price change this week, while KDP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -4.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.99%.
Reported Earning Dates
KDP is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-0.49% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| CCHBF | KDP | CCHBF / KDP | |
| Capitalization | 18.2B | 37B | 49% |
| EBITDA | 1.77B | 3.41B | 52% |
| Gain YTD | 50.933 | -13.426 | -379% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.34 | 24.10 | 72% |
| Revenue | 11.2B | 15.8B | 71% |
| Total Cash | 2.68B | 509M | 527% |
| Total Debt | 4.35B | 17.6B | 25% |
CCHBF | KDP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 92 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CCHBF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as KDP (50) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCHBF’s stock grew similarly to KDP’s over the last 12 months.
CCHBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KDP (92) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCHBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.
CCHBF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KDP (82) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCHBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.
CCHBF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as KDP (50) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCHBF’s stock grew similarly to KDP’s over the last 12 months.
KDP's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCHBF (63) in the null industry. This means that KDP’s stock grew similarly to CCHBF’s over the last 12 months.
| CCHBF | KDP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 25% | 1 day ago 41% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 28% | 1 day ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 26% | 1 day ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 9% | 1 day ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 29% | 1 day ago 41% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 41% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 33% | 1 day ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 35% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TRTY | 27.79 | 0.21 | +0.75% |
| Cambria Trinity ETF | |||
| ZAUG | 26.34 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| Innovator Equity Defined Prt ETF -1YrAug | |||
| ADIV | 18.73 | -0.02 | -0.13% |
| SmartETFs Asia Pcfc Dvdnd Bldr ETF | |||
| SDHY | 17.02 | -0.03 | -0.18% |
| PGIM Short Duration High Yield Opportunities Fund | |||
| CGDG | 34.70 | -0.15 | -0.43% |
| Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF | |||
CCHBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CCHBF and CELH have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCHBF and CELH's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCHBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCHBF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CELH - CCHBF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.17% | ||
| CCOJY - CCHBF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CCHGY - CCHBF | 0% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| KDP - CCHBF | -1% Poorly correlated | -1.30% | ||
| CCOJF - CCHBF | -2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
KDP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KDP has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KDP jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KDP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KDP | 100% | -1.30% | ||
| PEP - KDP | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| KO - KDP | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| CCEP - KDP | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| MNST - KDP | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| COKE - KDP | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
More | ||||