The non-alcoholic beverage industry is navigating a period of significant change, characterized by shifting consumer preferences toward health-conscious products, persistent inflationary cost pressures, and evolving distribution dynamics. Within this landscape, KDP and PEP present two distinct investment profiles: one a mid-cap challenger undergoing a transformative strategic overhaul, the other a global mega-cap staple with unmatched brand diversification. This stock comparison examines how these two beverage-sector names stack up across growth trajectory, business model resilience, market sentiment, and forward-looking catalysts, offering a balanced framework for investors evaluating relative positioning in the consumer staples space.
Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) is a leading North American beverage company with a portfolio spanning carbonated soft drinks, coffee, tea, water, juice, and mixers, generating over $16.6 billion in annual revenue. In recent months, KDP has demonstrated notable operational momentum, particularly in its U.S. Refreshment Beverages segment, which has delivered market share gains across carbonated soft drinks, energy drinks, and sports hydration categories. The acquisition of GHOST has been a meaningful contributor to volume growth, while flagship brands like Dr Pepper and Canada Dry continue to perform well. The U.S. Coffee segment, however, remains a source of pressure, with volume declines driven by lower K-Cup pod and brewer shipments, partially offset by pricing actions. In February 2026, the company reported full-year 2025 adjusted diluted EPS of $2.05, reflecting year-over-year growth of over 7%, and issued 2026 guidance targeting low-double-digit adjusted EPS growth, including the anticipated contribution from the JDE Peet's acquisition. The stock has recovered from a 52-week low near $25 to trade around $30–$31 in recent weeks, supported by improving sentiment around the company's strategic roadmap.
PepsiCo (PEP) is one of the world's largest food and beverage companies, with a portfolio encompassing iconic brands such as Pepsi, Lay's, Gatorade, Doritos, Mountain Dew, and Quaker, and operations spanning over 200 countries. The company's recent performance reflects a mixed operating environment: full-year 2025 organic revenue grew just 1.7%, with global volume declines in each of the first three quarters of the year. The North American snack business, particularly Frito-Lay, has faced headwinds from health-conscious consumer shifts and a challenging affordability backdrop, while the beverage segment has shown modest improvement as the year progressed. Fourth-quarter results offered a brighter picture, with reported net revenue up 5.6% year-over-year and double-digit core constant currency EPS growth, prompting management to affirm fiscal 2026 guidance of 2%–4% organic revenue growth and 4%–6% core constant currency EPS growth. PEP shares have traded in a wide range over the past year, declining from above $170 to lows near $128 before recovering to the $140–$145 range in recent weeks. The involvement of activist investor Elliott Investment Management, which took a $4 billion stake in late 2025, has added a layer of strategic uncertainty — and potential upside — to the PEP narrative.
For traders seeking a data-driven edge in navigating names like KDP and PEP, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to adapt to evolving market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots covering thousands of tickers, but only the most statistically robust and market-suited strategies earn a place in this featured section. These bots span a wide variety of trading styles — from short-term momentum and swing trading to longer-term trend-following approaches — and each bot displays transparent performance statistics including win rates, annualized returns, and trade frequency. In recent market conditions, top-performing bots have demonstrated win rates ranging from 55% to over 80%, depending on strategy and timeframe, with some achieving double-digit annualized returns. Whether a trader is focused on consumer staples or broader sector rotation, the Trending AI Robots section provides a practical starting point to explore automated strategies that align with current market dynamics.
The most fundamental contrast between KDP and PEP is one of scale and scope. PepsiCo's roughly $187 billion market capitalization and combined snack-and-beverage model provides diversification that KDP, at approximately $42 billion and primarily beverage-focused, cannot match. However, KDP's smaller size also translates into a higher organic growth ceiling — its 2025 constant currency net sales growth above 8% dwarfed PEP's 1.7% organic growth, even accounting for M&A (mergers and acquisitions) contributions.
On the margin front, both companies face inflationary pressures, but PEP's vast productivity savings programs and pricing power across 60 brands provide a buffer that KDP is still building. KDP's adjusted operating margin of approximately 25% trails PEP's segment-level profitability in beverages, though KDP's U.S. Coffee segment posts some of the highest margins in the industry.
From a capital returns perspective, PEP is the clear leader. Its 54-year streak of dividend increases and new $10 billion buyback authorization underscore an entrenched shareholder-return culture. KDP pays a dividend yielding roughly 3%, but its capital allocation story is dominated by the transformational JDE Peet's transaction, which introduces both significant upside potential and integration risk.
Market sentiment has diverged notably in 2026. KDP shares have benefited from the clarity around its separation strategy and improving execution in Refreshment Beverages, while PEP has contended with volume concerns and the uncertain outcome of activist engagement. Analyst consensus reflects this divide: Barclays upgraded KDP to a Buy rating in late June 2026 with a $36 price target, while maintaining a Hold on PEP.
Valuation further highlights the trade-off. KDP's forward P/E of approximately 13.4 represents a material discount to PEP's multiple, suggesting the market is pricing in higher uncertainty around KDP's transformation — but also potentially offering greater upside if execution meets targets.
Based on observable factors — including relative momentum, trend consistency, forward growth trajectory, and the presence of tangible catalysts — Tickeron's AI models would likely lean toward KDP in the current environment. KDP's combination of stronger recent top-line growth, a compressed valuation, a clearly defined transformational catalyst in the JDE Peet's integration, and superior year-to-date price performance suggests a more favorable risk-reward profile from a trend-following and momentum-aware perspective. PepsiCo's stability, dividend reliability, and unmatched global diversification remain powerful attributes, but the AI framework tends to prioritize stocks exhibiting positive trend consistency and identifiable near-to-medium-term catalysts. That said, the probabilistic nature of AI-driven analysis means no outcome is certain, and relative positioning can shift quickly as new fundamental and technical data emerges. Traders monitoring both names may benefit from tracking real-time signals through Tickeron's AI-powered tools.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KDP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePEP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KDP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
KDP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -3.98% price change this week, while PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -0.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -3.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.35%.
KDP is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
PEP is expected to report earnings on Oct 13, 2026.
Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| KDP | PEP | KDP / PEP | |
| Capitalization | 40.4B | 186B | 22% |
| EBITDA | 4.05B | 18.6B | 22% |
| Gain YTD | 8.551 | -2.933 | -292% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.00 | 17.91 | 123% |
| Revenue | 16.9B | 96.9B | 17% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 10.7B | - |
| Total Debt | 25.7B | 53.2B | 48% |
KDP | PEP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 84 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PEP's Valuation (16) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as KDP (22). This means that PEP’s stock grew similarly to KDP’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as KDP (100). This means that PEP’s stock grew similarly to KDP’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's SMR Rating (19) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KDP (79). This means that PEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.
KDP's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PEP (60). This means that KDP’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.
KDP's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PEP (83). This means that KDP’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.
| KDP | PEP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 52% | 24 days ago 39% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 5 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 35% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KDP has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KDP jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KDP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KDP | 100% | +0.03% | ||
| PEP - KDP | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| FIZZ - KDP | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| MNST - KDP | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| COKE - KDP | 27% Poorly correlated | +3.65% | ||
| CCEP - KDP | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.44% | ||
More | ||||