CDE
Price
$17.61
Change
-$1.79 (-9.23%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
18.22B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KGC
Price
$28.38
Change
-$2.51 (-8.13%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
34B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDE vs KGC

Header iconCDE vs KGC Comparison
Open Charts CDE vs KGCBanner chart's image
CDE vs KGC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) vs. Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both CDE and KGC are precious metals producers benefiting from elevated gold prices, but KGC offers a dividend yield of 0.49% while CDE does not.
  • KGC reported record Q1 free cash flow of $838 million and net income of $843 million in recent quarters, driving shareholder returns despite a post-earnings dip.
  • CDE has surged over 340% in the past year on strong production and cash growth, outperforming the industry, though recent trading shows volatility.
  • KGC boasts a larger market cap of $35.3 billion compared to CDE's $18.3 billion, reflecting greater scale.
  • Both stocks exhibit high betas around 1.3-1.4 (a measure of volatility relative to the market), indicating similar risk profiles in the cyclical mining sector.
  • Year-to-date, KGC leads with 3.41% gains versus CDE's 1.01%.

Introduction

Comparing CDE and KGC offers valuable insights for investors and traders navigating the precious metals sector. Both companies are key players in gold and silver mining, exposed to commodity price swings, production efficiencies, and macroeconomic trends like inflation and geopolitical tensions. This stock comparison highlights relative performance, financial health, and market positioning, aiding decisions on sector allocation, momentum plays, or diversified portfolios. With gold maintaining strength amid uncertainty, understanding these peers' contrasts in scale, output, and momentum is essential for informed trading strategies.

CDE Overview and Recent Performance

Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) is a U.S.-based growing precious metals producer with operations in the United States, Canada, and Mexico, focusing on gold, silver, zinc, and lead. The company markets concentrates to third-party refiners. In recent market activity, CDE shares have traded around $17.65, within a 52-week range of $5.27 to $27.77, reflecting high volatility. Strong Q4 2025 results featured revenue of $674.85 million and sharp cash growth to $554 million, bolstered by production gains and a new gold deal. The stock has rocketed over 340% in the past year, outpacing the mining industry, driven by operational improvements and favorable metal prices. However, sentiment has cooled in recent weeks amid broader pullbacks, with upcoming earnings anticipated to influence direction. Key metrics include a PE ratio (price-to-earnings) of 18.58 and EPS (earnings per share) of $0.95 trailing twelve months.

KGC Overview and Recent Performance

Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) engages in gold mining and exploration across the Americas, West Africa, and other regions. Trading near $29.55 lately, within a 52-week span of $13.28 to $39.11, the stock mirrors sector dynamics. Recent quarters highlighted exceptional Q1 2026 performance with $2.41 billion in revenue, $843 million net income, and record $838 million free cash flow, supporting dividends and buybacks. Shares rose over 126% in the past year on robust margins and project advances but dipped post-earnings amid profit-taking. Positive analyst views persist, with a PE of 12.57, trailing EPS of $2.35, and a modest dividend yield. Elevated gold prices and operational discipline have fueled sentiment, though shares face pressure from recent market rotations.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available—specifically 25 standout bots selected from 351 total—that adapt best to current market conditions. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend following, swing trading, and AI/ML signals across timeframes from 5 minutes to 49 days, trading stocks, ETFs, and crypto with risk controls such as take-profit/stop-loss corridors. Performance stats shine: annualized returns range 30-127%, win rates 50-70%, profit factors 1.5-4.5, and profit-to-drawdown ratios up to 17. Gold miner-focused bots appear amid precious metals momentum, alongside semis and small caps. Explore these bots to discover automated signals potentially suited for CDE or KGC trading styles.

Head-to-Head Comparison

CDE emphasizes a diversified metals mix including silver and base metals, with mid-tier operations, contrasting KGC’s larger-scale, gold-centric portfolio across global assets. Growth drivers align on gold price tailwinds, but KGC leverages superior free cash flow for dividends and expansions, while CDE prioritizes debt management and production ramps. Recent momentum favors CDE’s explosive yearly gains versus KGC’s steadier climb, yet year-to-date KGC edges ahead. Risk factors include comparable high betas and commodity exposure; CDE shows higher PE suggesting growth premium, while KGC trades cheaper. Market sentiment tilts positive for both on analyst upgrades, but KGC’s scale offers trade-offs in stability over CDE’s upside potential.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors KGC over CDE based on trend consistency from record cash generation, dividend support, and larger operational scale, positioning it better amid volatility. While CDE exhibits strong historical momentum, KGC’s recent catalysts and relative valuation suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term, barring major shifts in metal prices or earnings surprises.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CDE vs. KGC commentary
May 18, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDE is a Hold and KGC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 18, 2026
Stock price -- (CDE: $17.61 vs. KGC: $28.38)
Brand notoriety: CDE: Not notable vs. KGC: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDE: 136% vs. KGC: 105%
Market capitalization -- CDE: $18.22B vs. KGC: $34B
CDE [@Precious Metals] is valued at $18.22B. KGC’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $134.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKGC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CDE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KGC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, KGC is a better buy in the long-term than CDE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KGC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDE is a better buy in the short-term than KGC.

Price Growth

CDE (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.12% price change this week, while KGC (@Precious Metals) price change was -9.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

CDE is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

KGC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-0.28% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGC($34B) has a higher market cap than CDE($18.2B). CDE has higher P/E ratio than KGC: CDE (14.20) vs KGC (12.08). KGC YTD gains are higher at: 0.904 vs. CDE (-1.234). KGC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.15B vs. CDE (1.31B). KGC has more cash in the bank: 2.19B vs. CDE (843M). KGC (738M) and CDE (773M) have identical debt. KGC has higher revenues than CDE: KGC (7.96B) vs CDE (2.57B).
CDEKGCCDE / KGC
Capitalization18.2B34B54%
EBITDA1.31B5.15B25%
Gain YTD-1.2340.904-136%
P/E Ratio14.2012.08118%
Revenue2.57B7.96B32%
Total Cash843M2.19B39%
Total Debt773M738M105%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDE vs KGC: Fundamental Ratings
CDE
KGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6257
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5726
SMR RATING
1..100
6427
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9064
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KGC's Valuation (20) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDE (75). This means that KGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDE’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CDE (57). This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to CDE’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's SMR Rating (27) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDE (64). This means that KGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDE’s over the last 12 months.

CDE's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as KGC (50). This means that CDE’s stock grew similarly to KGC’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CDE (90). This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to CDE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDEKGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VDI35.25N/A
N/A
Virtus International Dividend ETF
ACVT27.36N/A
N/A
Advent Convertible Bond ETF
RIV11.45-0.13
-1.12%
RiverNorth Opportunities Fund
MHD11.49-0.14
-1.21%
Blackrock Muniholdings Fund
PSR99.51-1.55
-1.54%
Invesco Active US Real Estate

CDE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDE has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDE jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDE
1D Price
Change %
CDE100%
-9.23%
PAAS - CDE
78%
Closely correlated
-7.68%
SA - CDE
78%
Closely correlated
-6.81%
AEM - CDE
77%
Closely correlated
-6.40%
KGC - CDE
77%
Closely correlated
-8.13%
IAG - CDE
76%
Closely correlated
-8.07%
More