Advertisement
CDLR vs PMA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDLR is a Hold and PMA is a Hold.
| CDLR | PMA | CDLR / PMA | |
| Capitalization | 2.46B | 199M | 1,234% |
| EBITDA | 416M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.171 | 25.000 | 149% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.29 | 8.21 | 125% |
| Revenue | 729M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 206M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.61B | N/A | - |
| CDLR | PMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 21 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | 7 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 7 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 6 days ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDLR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PMA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CDLR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDLR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CDLR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PMA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
CDLR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -1.32% price change this week, while PMA (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -3.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
CDLR is expected to report earnings on Nov 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-2.87% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BAMG | 44.35 | 0.24 | +0.54% |
| Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) | |||
| GENW | 15.28 | N/A | N/A |
| Genter Capital International Dividend ETF (GENW) | |||
| OAKG | 26.89 | N/A | N/A |
| Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF (OAKG) | |||
| HTRB | 32.72 | -0.12 | -0.38% |
| Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB) | |||
| BINT | 32.63 | -0.13 | -0.40% |
| Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) | |||
CDLR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDLR has been loosely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDLR jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDLR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDLR | 100% | +0.71% | ||
| FIX - CDLR | 34% Loosely correlated | +4.92% | ||
| AMRC - CDLR | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| STRL - CDLR | 33% Loosely correlated | +2.56% | ||
| ECG - CDLR | 33% Loosely correlated | +2.32% | ||
| TPC - CDLR | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
More | ||||
PMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PMA and FLR have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMA and FLR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMA | 100% | +0.81% | ||
| FLR - PMA | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
| ZDAI - PMA | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.65% | ||
| MTZ - PMA | 7% Poorly correlated | +3.19% | ||
| ONEG - PMA | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CDLR - PMA | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.71% | ||
More | ||||