Advertisement
MTZ vs PMA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTZ is a Hold and PMA is a Hold.
| MTZ | PMA | MTZ / PMA | |
| Capitalization | 17.2B | 199M | 8,643% |
| EBITDA | 1.31B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.376 | 25.000 | -6% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.14 | 8.21 | 416% |
| Revenue | 16.1B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 316M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 3.24B | N/A | - |
MTZ | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 38 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MTZ | PMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 79% | 21 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 75% | 7 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 6 days ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MTZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while PMA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MTZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MTZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PMA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -10.83% price change this week, while PMA (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -3.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-2.87% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GTCRX | 14.22 | -0.01 | -0.11% |
| GuidePath® Tactical Allocation RS | |||
| SUVQX | 15.25 | -0.05 | -0.33% |
| PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val R6 | |||
| VVOSX | 27.99 | -0.12 | -0.43% |
| Invesco Value Opportunities R6 | |||
| LPEIX | 5.60 | -0.03 | -0.53% |
| ALPS Global Opportunity I | |||
| DSCLX | 21.30 | -0.18 | -0.84% |
| DFA International Social Cor Eq Instl | |||
PMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PMA and FLR have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMA and FLR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMA | 100% | +0.81% | ||
| FLR - PMA | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
| ZDAI - PMA | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.65% | ||
| MTZ - PMA | 7% Poorly correlated | +3.19% | ||
| ONEG - PMA | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CDLR - PMA | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.71% | ||
More | ||||