CDNS
Price
$326.22
Change
-$4.24 (-1.28%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
91.15B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CRWD
Price
$183.26
Change
-$0.16 (-0.09%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
186.77B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDNS vs CRWD

CDNS vs CRWD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) vs. CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) is a profitable, mature leader in electronic design automation (EDA) with steady revenue growth, while CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) is a high-growth cybersecurity platform still navigating the path to sustained GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) profitability.
  • CRWD has delivered dramatically stronger price momentum in recent months, rising over 73% year-to-date, compared to CDNS's more modest single-digit gain.
  • CDNS benefits from a record backlog of $7.8 billion and an expanding AI-driven product portfolio, providing high revenue visibility and predictability.
  • CRWD's market capitalization of roughly $207 billion is more than double CDNS's ~$91 billion, yet CDNS generates higher trailing revenue and significantly stronger net income.
  • Both companies are deeply exposed to secular AI (Artificial Intelligence) growth themes but operate in fundamentally different segments — semiconductor design tools versus endpoint security.
  • Valuation divergence is stark: CDNS trades at a forward P/E (Price-to-Earnings ratio, a valuation metric) near 42, while CRWD trades at a forward P/E above 160, reflecting sharply different market expectations.

Introduction

Investors evaluating technology stocks in mid-2026 face a market shaped by artificial intelligence enthusiasm, shifting Federal Reserve policy, and sector rotation dynamics. Two names that frequently appear on institutional watchlists — yet represent very different investment profiles — are CDNS and CRWD. Cadence Design Systems provides the essential software tools used to design the world's most advanced semiconductors. CrowdStrike delivers cloud-native cybersecurity that protects the endpoints those chips power. This comparison examines how these two AI-era beneficiaries stack up across business fundamentals, recent performance, risk factors, and what signals an AI-driven analytical framework might emphasize when evaluating both stocks side by side.

CDNS Overview and Recent Performance

CDNS, or Cadence Design Systems, is a cornerstone of the global semiconductor ecosystem. The company develops EDA software, hardware, and intellectual property used by chip designers — including industry giants such as NVIDIA, AMD, and Intel — to create everything from AI accelerators to automotive processors. In recent weeks, CDNS shares have faced notable selling pressure, giving back a significant portion of their earlier gains. The stock has declined roughly 15% over the past month, retreating from levels above $380 toward the $330 range. This pullback has occurred despite solid fundamentals: Cadence reported fiscal year 2025 revenue of $5.3 billion, representing over 14% year-over-year growth, and closed the year with a record backlog of $7.8 billion. The recent weakness appears tied to broader market rotation away from richly valued technology names and potential concerns about China export restrictions, which the company has acknowledged but indicated it can manage. CEO Anirudh Devgan has emphasized the "AI Supercycle" as a multi-year catalyst spanning infrastructure build-out, autonomous systems, and scientific computing. With non-GAAP (non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which exclude certain one-time items) operating margins near 44%, Cadence remains one of the most profitable software companies in its peer group.

CRWD Overview and Recent Performance

CRWD, CrowdStrike Holdings, has established itself as a dominant force in the cybersecurity industry through its Falcon platform — a cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection system that has redefined how enterprises detect and respond to threats. The stock has been on a remarkable run in recent market activity, surging more than 73% year-to-date and gaining nearly 19% in the past month alone. Shares recently traded around the $203 level, pulling back modestly after touching a 52-week high above $217. CrowdStrike's fiscal year 2026 revenue reached $4.81 billion, up approximately 22% year-over-year, as organizations continue prioritizing cybersecurity spending amid an evolving threat landscape. However, the company has not yet achieved consistent GAAP profitability, reporting a net loss of roughly $162 million for the fiscal year. On a more encouraging note, CrowdStrike returned to positive net income in the most recent quarter. The company's high revenue retention rates, expanding module adoption among existing customers, and steady growth in annual recurring revenue (ARR) have fueled investor enthusiasm. Analysts remain broadly constructive, though the stock's stretched valuation — trading at over 40 times trailing sales — leaves limited room for execution missteps.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking to navigate complex stock comparisons like this one with data-driven precision, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's most effective automated trading tools. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. These bots span a wide range of trading styles — from short-term swing trading to longer-term trend following — each with distinct strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker selections. The curated nature of the Trending AI Robots section helps traders cut through the noise and explore AI-driven approaches that have recently shown the most promising statistical profiles. Whether your focus is on semiconductor-adjacent software like CDNS or cybersecurity momentum plays like CRWD, exploring these bots can provide a quantitative perspective that complements traditional fundamental analysis.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When placed side by side, CDNS and CRWD reveal a classic contrast between quality-at-a-reasonable-price and high-growth-at-any-price investing styles. Cadence operates in the EDA market, which functions as an effective duopoly alongside Synopsys, giving both firms considerable pricing power and deeply embedded customer relationships. Chip designers cannot easily switch tool providers mid-project, creating a wide moat. CrowdStrike, meanwhile, competes in the fiercely contested cybersecurity arena against well-funded rivals including Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, and SentinelOne. While its Falcon platform enjoys strong differentiation, the competitive landscape demands continuous innovation and elevated sales and marketing expenditure.

On growth, CRWD holds the edge with revenue expanding above 20% annually, compared to CDNS's mid-teens pace. Yet CDNS converts that growth far more efficiently: Cadence generated over $1.1 billion in net income over the trailing twelve months, while CrowdStrike remains in the red on a trailing GAAP basis, though recent quarters have shown improvement. The valuation gap is immense — CRWD trades at a price-to-sales ratio above 40, more than double CDNS's ratio near 16. Sector exposure also differs meaningfully: CDNS is tethered to semiconductor capital expenditure cycles and AI infrastructure build-out, while CRWD is driven by enterprise cybersecurity budgets and threat activity. In terms of risk, CDNS faces geopolitical headwinds from China export controls, while CRWD must contend with the lingering reputational and legal aftermath of its 2024 outage incident, as well as intensifying platform competition. Market sentiment currently favors CRWD's momentum narrative, but CDNS offers a more battle-tested track record of consistent profitability and cash flow generation.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, fundamental stability, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely lean toward CDNS as the more probabilistically favorable candidate in the current environment. While CRWD commands stronger near-term price momentum and a compelling top-line growth trajectory, its extreme valuation multiples and inconsistent profitability profile introduce elevated risk that quantitative models tend to penalize. CDNS, by contrast, presents a more balanced profile: sustained double-digit revenue growth backed by a record-level backlog, best-in-class operating margins, consistent GAAP profitability, and a valuation that — while not cheap — appears more grounded relative to earnings power. The recent price pullback in CDNS may also be interpreted by trend-following algorithms as a potential mean-reversion opportunity within an intact long-term uptrend. That said, CRWD's improving profitability metrics and dominant competitive position in endpoint security mean the AI verdict is closer than surface-level numbers suggest. The balance of observable data points — particularly around earnings quality, margin stability, and valuation discipline — tilts the probabilistic assessment in CDNS's favor for investors evaluating risk-adjusted return potential over a multi-quarter horizon.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CDNS vs. CRWD commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNS is a Hold and CRWD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (CDNS: $330.46 vs. CRWD: $183.42)
Brand notoriety: CDNS: Not notable vs. CRWD: Notable
CDNS represents the Packaged Software, while CRWD is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNS: 60% vs. CRWD: 38%
Market capitalization -- CDNS: $91.15B vs. CRWD: $186.77B
CDNS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $91.15B. CRWD’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $186.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $397.44B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $2.83T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.23B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $28.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCRWD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CRWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDNS is a better buy in the long-term than CRWD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDNS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRWD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDNS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CRWD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDNS is a better buy in the short-term than CRWD.

Price Growth

CDNS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -9.38% price change this week, while CRWD (@Computer Communications) price change was -9.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.02%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -5.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

CDNS is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.

CRWD is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-4.90% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (-5.04% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRWD($187B) has a higher market cap than CDNS($91.1B). CRWD has higher P/E ratio than CDNS: CRWD (765.02) vs CDNS (77.03). CRWD YTD gains are higher at: 56.515 vs. CDNS (5.720). CDNS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.98B vs. CRWD (329M). CRWD has more cash in the bank: 4.55B vs. CDNS (1.41B). CRWD has less debt than CDNS: CRWD (821M) vs CDNS (3.08B). CDNS has higher revenues than CRWD: CDNS (5.53B) vs CRWD (5.09B).
CDNSCRWDCDNS / CRWD
Capitalization91.1B187B49%
EBITDA1.98B329M602%
Gain YTD5.72056.51510%
P/E Ratio77.03765.0210%
Revenue5.53B5.09B109%
Total Cash1.41B4.55B31%
Total Debt3.08B821M376%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNS vs CRWD: Fundamental Ratings
CDNS
CRWD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5771
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2718
SMR RATING
1..100
4592
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5836
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5564
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDNS's Valuation (88) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as CRWD (100) in the null industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.

CRWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNS (27) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to CDNS’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's SMR Rating (45) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (92) in the null industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.

CRWD's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNS (58) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to CDNS’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as CRWD (64) in the null industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDNSCRWD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDNS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CRWD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSCO112.760.55
+0.49%
Cisco Systems
SPPL3.31-0.02
-0.60%
Simpple Ltd
PRGS36.92-0.99
-2.61%
Progress Software Corp
RCKY40.10-1.12
-2.72%
Rocky Brands
ACI11.44-3.16
-21.64%
Albertsons Companies

CDNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDNS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNS
1D Price
Change %
CDNS100%
-1.94%
SNPS - CDNS
84%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
S - CDNS
59%
Loosely correlated
-4.61%
MSFT - CDNS
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.24%
ORCL - CDNS
58%
Loosely correlated
-4.61%
CRWD - CDNS
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.65%
More

CRWD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWD has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRWD jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRWD
1D Price
Change %
CRWD100%
-2.65%
PANW - CRWD
77%
Closely correlated
-2.88%
OKTA - CRWD
70%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
NOW - CRWD
68%
Closely correlated
-3.69%
TENB - CRWD
66%
Closely correlated
-3.69%
ZS - CRWD
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.80%
More