The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CELH turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where CELH's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 39 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 87%.
Following a +0.56% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CELH advanced for three days, in 237 of 295 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 45 of 49 cases where CELH's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 23, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on CELH as a result. In 74 of 83 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.
CELH moved below its 50-day moving average on October 21, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CELH declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.
CELH broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 19, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for CELH entered a downward trend on October 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 62 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. CELH’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 71 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 82 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 98 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (6.005) is normal, around the industry mean (-4.359). CELH's P/E Ratio (123.783) is considerably higher than the industry average of (25.067). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.256) is also within normal values, averaging (3.732). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.039) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.408) is also within normal values, averaging (2.785).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CELH’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 73, placing this stock worse than average.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for ZVIA turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where ZVIA's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 38 of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where ZVIA's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 28 of 36 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 52 of 65 cases where ZVIA's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 16, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on ZVIA as a result. In 76 of 91 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
Following a +4.20% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ZVIA advanced for three days, in 202 of 247 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ZVIA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
ZVIA broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 23, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for ZVIA entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 18 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 23 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.092) is normal, around the industry mean (-4.359). ZVIA has a moderately low P/E Ratio (-9.846) as compared to the industry average of (25.067). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (3.732). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.039) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.538) is also within normal values, averaging (2.785).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 75 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. ZVIA’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 95 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. ZVIA’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 73, placing this stock worse than average.
CELH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CELH | ZVIA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 9 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 84% | 25 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CELH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while ZVIA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CELH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZVIA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CELH (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +0.99% price change this week, while ZVIA (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +3.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.05%.
CELH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
ZVIA is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| YNOT | 30.31 | 0.07 | +0.22% |
| Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT) | |||
| ESGD | 101.97 | -0.34 | -0.33% |
| iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) | |||
| OCTT | 48.38 | -0.16 | -0.33% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT) | |||
| FXU | 47.45 | -0.38 | -0.79% |
| First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) | |||
| CEGX | 11.05 | -0.16 | -1.43% |
| Tradr 2X Long CEG Daily ETF (CEGX) | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that CELH and KDP have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELH and KDP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CELH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CELH | 100% | +0.39% | ||
| KDP - CELH | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.45% | ||
| FIZZ - CELH | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.48% | ||
| PEP - CELH | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.20% | ||
| MNST - CELH | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.35% | ||
| REED - CELH | 20% Poorly correlated | +20.57% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that ZVIA and OTLY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZVIA and OTLY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZVIA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZVIA | 100% | +4.92% | ||
| OTLY - ZVIA | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.17% | ||
| MNST - ZVIA | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.35% | ||
| COKE - ZVIA | 21% Poorly correlated | -5.30% | ||
| FIZZ - ZVIA | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.48% | ||
| CCEP - ZVIA | 15% Poorly correlated | -2.97% | ||
More | ||||