CELH
Price
$44.72
Change
-$0.62 (-1.37%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
19.3B
8 days until earnings call
ZVIA
Price
$3.37
Change
+$0.33 (+10.86%)
Updated
Aug 4, 11:01 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
61.66M
2 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CELH vs ZVIA

Header iconCELH vs ZVIA Comparison
Open Charts CELH vs ZVIABanner chart's image
Celsius Holdings
Price$44.72
Change-$0.62 (-1.37%)
Volume$3.93M
Capitalization19.3B
Zevia PBC
Price$3.37
Change+$0.33 (+10.86%)
Volume$710
Capitalization61.66M
CELH vs ZVIA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CELH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZVIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CELH vs. ZVIA commentary
Aug 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELH is a StrongBuy and ZVIA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CELH: $44.72 vs. ZVIA: $3.04)
Brand notoriety: CELH and ZVIA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CELH: 64% vs. ZVIA: 82%
Market capitalization -- CELH: $19.3B vs. ZVIA: $61.66M
CELH [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $19.3B. ZVIA’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $61.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $263.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $24.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CELH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZVIA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CELH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZVIA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CELH is a better buy in the long-term than ZVIA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CELH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZVIA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CELH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZVIA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CELH is a better buy in the short-term than ZVIA.

Price Growth

CELH (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -4.12% price change this week, while ZVIA (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -7.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

CELH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

ZVIA is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-1.83% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CELH($19.3B) has a higher market cap than ZVIA($61.7M). CELH YTD gains are higher at: 69.780 vs. ZVIA (-27.446). CELH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 270M vs. ZVIA (-27.33M). CELH has more cash in the bank: 756M vs. ZVIA (32M). ZVIA has less debt than CELH: ZVIA (1.95M) vs CELH (2.19M). CELH has higher revenues than ZVIA: CELH (1.32B) vs ZVIA (166M).
CELHZVIACELH / ZVIA
Capitalization19.3B61.7M31,280%
EBITDA270M-27.33M-988%
Gain YTD69.780-27.446-254%
P/E Ratio107.25N/A-
Revenue1.32B166M794%
Total Cash756M32M2,363%
Total Debt2.19M1.95M112%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CELH: Fundamental Ratings
CELH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61
SMR RATING
1..100
46
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CELHZVIA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CELH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZVIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XC33.640.05
+0.16%
WisdomTree True Emerging Markets ETF
DYNI26.28N/A
N/A
ETF Opportunities Trust IDX Dynamic Innovation ETF
BALT32.24-0.08
-0.25%
Innovator Defined Wealth Shld ETF
CSNR26.46-0.21
-0.79%
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Act ETF
BIBL41.81-0.52
-1.23%
Inspire 100 ETF

CELH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CELH and MNST have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELH and MNST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELH
1D Price
Change %
CELH100%
-1.37%
MNST - CELH
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
CCEP - CELH
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
KDP - CELH
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.05%
KO - CELH
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
PEP - CELH
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
More

ZVIA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZVIA and OTLY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZVIA and OTLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZVIA
1D Price
Change %
ZVIA100%
-1.94%
OTLY - ZVIA
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
CELH - ZVIA
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
KOF - ZVIA
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
PEP - ZVIA
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
KDP - ZVIA
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.05%
More