Advertisement
CELH vs MNST
CELH and MNST are developers of specialty beverages marketed as energy drinks primarily. CELH is significantly smaller, with a market cap at the time of this writing of approximately $6B compared to MNST’s $50B. CELH currently has about 5 types of beverages in various flavors distributed almost exclusively in North America, but they acquired a Nordic distributor in 2019 which is intended to propel them into the European market. CELH’s beverages use naturally-based and nutritious ingredients which stimulate the body’s ability to burn calories during a workout while increasing endurance. MNST is not partial to natural or artificial ingredients and has branched out from flavored energy soda-like beverages to canned coffee drinks and other alternative beverages. MNST sells its products to large distributors, with sales to Coca-Cola bottling groups accounting for about 30% of its net income in 2020. MNST shows a much higher ROA and ROE than CELH currently, as well as significantly higher margins.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CELH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CELH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MNST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CELH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CELH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MNST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CELH (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -6.45% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -4.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -3.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.35%.
Reported Earning Dates
CELH is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-3.20% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| CELH | MNST | CELH / MNST | |
| Capitalization | 6.93B | 91.4B | 8% |
| EBITDA | 298M | 2.71B | 11% |
| Gain YTD | -40.708 | 21.938 | -186% |
| P/E Ratio | 63.07 | 45.16 | 140% |
| Revenue | 2.97B | 8.79B | 34% |
| Total Cash | 549M | 2.99B | 18% |
| Total Debt | 669M | 199M | 336% |
CELH | MNST | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CELH's Valuation (85) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (86). This means that CELH’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for CELH (96). This means that MNST’s stock grew significantly faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's SMR Rating (36) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CELH (62). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELH (80). This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELH (95). This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.
| CELH | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 45% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 42% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 16 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 38% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 58% |
Advertisement
CELH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CELH and MNST have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELH and MNST's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CELH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CELH | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| MNST - CELH | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| KDP - CELH | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.03% | ||
| FIZZ - CELH | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
| PEP - CELH | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
| CCEP - CELH | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.44% | ||
More | ||||
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.03% | ||
| FIZZ - MNST | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
| COKE - MNST | 26% Poorly correlated | +3.65% | ||
More | ||||