Advertisement
CELH vs MNST
CELH and MNST are developers of specialty beverages marketed as energy drinks primarily. CELH is significantly smaller, with a market cap at the time of this writing of approximately $6B compared to MNST’s $50B. CELH currently has about 5 types of beverages in various flavors distributed almost exclusively in North America, but they acquired a Nordic distributor in 2019 which is intended to propel them into the European market. CELH’s beverages use naturally-based and nutritious ingredients which stimulate the body’s ability to burn calories during a workout while increasing endurance. MNST is not partial to natural or artificial ingredients and has branched out from flavored energy soda-like beverages to canned coffee drinks and other alternative beverages. MNST sells its products to large distributors, with sales to Coca-Cola bottling groups accounting for about 30% of its net income in 2020. MNST shows a much higher ROA and ROE than CELH currently, as well as significantly higher margins.
CELH's MACD Histogram crosses above signal line
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CELH turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where CELH's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 39 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 87%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
Following a +0.56% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CELH advanced for three days, in 237 of 295 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 45 of 49 cases where CELH's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 23, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on CELH as a result. In 74 of 83 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.
CELH moved below its 50-day moving average on October 21, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CELH declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.
CELH broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 19, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for CELH entered a downward trend on October 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 62 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. CELH’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 71 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 82 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 98 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (6.005) is normal, around the industry mean (-4.359). CELH's P/E Ratio (123.783) is considerably higher than the industry average of (25.067). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.256) is also within normal values, averaging (3.732). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.039) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.408) is also within normal values, averaging (2.785).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CELH’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 73, placing this stock worse than average.
MNST in upward trend: price rose above 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026
MNST moved above its 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 28 of 42 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on MNST as a result. In 53 of 93 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MNST just turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where MNST's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 28 of 49 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
The 10-day moving average for MNST crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 21, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 10 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 59%.
Following a +2.86% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MNST advanced for three days, in 211 of 348 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for MNST moved out of overbought territory on October 23, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 42 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 20 of the 42 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 48%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 10 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MNST declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 47%.
MNST broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for MNST entered a downward trend on October 08, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 26 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating outstanding price growth. MNST’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 37 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 44 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 51 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 73, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 92 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (9.663) is normal, around the industry mean (-4.359). P/E Ratio (42.571) is within average values for comparable stocks, (25.067). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.153) is also within normal values, averaging (3.732). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.039) among similar stocks. MNST's P/S Ratio (9.542) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (2.785).
CELH | MNST | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 51 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 26 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MNST's Valuation (92) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CELH (98). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELH (100). This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's SMR Rating (37) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELH (82). This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Price Growth Rating (26) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELH (62). This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CELH (71). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.
| CELH | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 84% | 18 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 39% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 41% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CELH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while MNST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CELH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MNST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CELH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CELH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MNST’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CELH (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +0.99% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +1.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.05%.
Reported Earning Dates
CELH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.33% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| YNOT | 30.31 | 0.07 | +0.22% |
| Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT) | |||
| ESGD | 101.97 | -0.34 | -0.33% |
| iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) | |||
| OCTT | 48.38 | -0.16 | -0.33% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT) | |||
| FXU | 47.45 | -0.38 | -0.79% |
| First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) | |||
| CEGX | 11.05 | -0.16 | -1.43% |
| Tradr 2X Long CEG Daily ETF (CEGX) | |||
CELH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CELH and KDP have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELH and KDP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CELH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CELH | 100% | +0.39% | ||
| KDP - CELH | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.45% | ||
| FIZZ - CELH | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.48% | ||
| PEP - CELH | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.20% | ||
| MNST - CELH | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.35% | ||
| REED - CELH | 20% Poorly correlated | +20.57% | ||
More | ||||
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | -2.35% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.97% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.20% | ||
| FIZZ - MNST | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.48% | ||
| COKE - MNST | 24% Poorly correlated | -5.30% | ||
More | ||||