The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CELH turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where CELH's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 39 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 87%.
Following a +0.56% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CELH advanced for three days, in 237 of 295 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 45 of 49 cases where CELH's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 23, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on CELH as a result. In 74 of 83 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.
CELH moved below its 50-day moving average on October 21, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CELH declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.
CELH broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 19, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for CELH entered a downward trend on October 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 62 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. CELH’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 71 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 82 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 98 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (6.005) is normal, around the industry mean (-4.359). CELH's P/E Ratio (123.783) is considerably higher than the industry average of (25.067). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.256) is also within normal values, averaging (3.732). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.039) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.408) is also within normal values, averaging (2.785).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CELH’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 73, placing this stock worse than average.
KDP moved above its 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 23 of 42 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 55%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on KDP as a result. In 44 of 89 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 49%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for KDP just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where KDP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 23 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 49%.
The 10-day moving average for KDP crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 13, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 9 of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 50%.
Following a +4.53% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where KDP advanced for three days, in 172 of 322 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 53%.
The 10-day RSI Indicator for KDP moved out of overbought territory on October 23, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 34 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 13 of the 34 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 38%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 9 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where KDP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 48%.
KDP broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for KDP entered a downward trend on October 09, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 11 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 13 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating outstanding price growth. KDP’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 71 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. KDP’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 73, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 78 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.885) is normal, around the industry mean (-4.359). P/E Ratio (35.030) is within average values for comparable stocks, (25.067). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.971) is also within normal values, averaging (3.732). Dividend Yield (0.027) settles around the average of (0.039) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.158) is also within normal values, averaging (2.785).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 82 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
CELH | KDP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 41 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 71 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 13 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KDP's Valuation (78) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CELH (98). This means that KDP’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.
KDP's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CELH (100). This means that KDP’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.
KDP's SMR Rating (82) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CELH (82). This means that KDP’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.
KDP's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELH (62). This means that KDP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.
KDP's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELH (71). This means that KDP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.
| CELH | KDP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 38% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 9 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 84% | 25 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 31% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CELH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while KDP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CELH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KDP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CELH (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +0.99% price change this week, while KDP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +0.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.05%.
CELH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
KDP is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
A.I.dvisor tells us that CELH and KDP have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELH and KDP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CELH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CELH | 100% | +0.39% | ||
| KDP - CELH | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.45% | ||
| FIZZ - CELH | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.48% | ||
| PEP - CELH | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.20% | ||
| MNST - CELH | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.35% | ||
| REED - CELH | 20% Poorly correlated | +20.57% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KDP has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KDP jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KDP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KDP | 100% | -1.45% | ||
| PEP - KDP | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.20% | ||
| MNST - KDP | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.35% | ||
| CCEP - KDP | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.97% | ||
| FIZZ - KDP | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| COKE - KDP | 31% Poorly correlated | -5.30% | ||
More | ||||