Advertisement
CELH vs PEP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELH is a Hold and PEP is a Hold.
CELH saw its Stochastic Oscillator leaves the overbought zone
The Stochastic Oscillator for CELH moved out of overbought territory on November 06, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock and investors may want to consider selling or taking a defensive position. A.I.dvisor looked at 49 similar instances where the indicator exited the overbought zone. In 43 of the 49 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 88%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator demonstrated that the stock has entered the overbought zone. This may point to a price pull-back soon.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CELH declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.
CELH broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 27, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CELH as a result. In 65 of 83 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CELH just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where CELH's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 35 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
CELH moved above its 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for CELH crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 04, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 13 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.
Following a +2.64% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CELH advanced for three days, in 237 of 295 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 163 of 222 cases where CELH Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 73%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 43 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. CELH’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 82 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 94 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 98 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (6.784) is normal, around the industry mean (-3.208). CELH's P/E Ratio (139.826) is considerably higher than the industry average of (26.786). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.256) is also within normal values, averaging (3.732). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.038) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.408) is also within normal values, averaging (2.785).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CELH’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 71, placing this stock worse than average.
PEP's RSI Oscillator leaves overbought zone
The 10-day RSI Indicator for PEP moved out of overbought territory on November 03, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. Traders may want to look at selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 32 instances where the indicator moved out of the overbought zone. In 18 of the 32 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move down at 56%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 4 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PEP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 49%.
PEP broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on PEP as a result. In 46 of 89 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 52%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for PEP just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where PEP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 22 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 49%.
PEP moved above its 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for PEP crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 28, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 7 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 41%.
Following a +3.96% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PEP advanced for three days, in 115 of 292 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 39%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 78 of 229 cases where PEP Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 34%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 20 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 45 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. PEP’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 70 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (8.730) is normal, around the industry mean (-3.208). P/E Ratio (18.500) is within average values for comparable stocks, (26.786). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.316) is also within normal values, averaging (3.732). Dividend Yield (0.042) settles around the average of (0.038) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.901) is also within normal values, averaging (2.785).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 81 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 87 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. PEP’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 71, placing this stock worse than average.
CELH | PEP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 98 | 87 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PEP's Valuation (70) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CELH (98). This means that PEP’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CELH (98). This means that PEP’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's SMR Rating (20) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELH (82). This means that PEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.
CELH's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PEP (45). This means that CELH’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CELH (94). This means that PEP’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.
| CELH | PEP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 44% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 39% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 84% | 12 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 34% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CELH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while PEP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CELH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PEP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CELH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CELH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PEP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CELH (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +10.44% price change this week, while PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +2.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +4.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.06%.
Reported Earning Dates
CELH is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2027.
PEP is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+4.21% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
Advertisement
CELH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CELH and KDP have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELH and KDP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CELH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CELH | 100% | +7.06% | ||
| KDP - CELH | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.70% | ||
| FIZZ - CELH | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
| MNST - CELH | 22% Poorly correlated | -4.41% | ||
| PEP - CELH | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.96% | ||
| CCEP - CELH | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.99% | ||
More | ||||
PEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEP has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PEP jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEP | 100% | -0.96% | ||
| CCEP - PEP | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| KDP - PEP | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| FIZZ - PEP | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| MNST - PEP | 32% Poorly correlated | -4.41% | ||
| COKE - PEP | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.17% | ||
More | ||||