It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CENX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKALU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CENX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KALU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CENX (@Aluminum) experienced а -11.51% price change this week, while KALU (@Aluminum) price change was -5.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aluminum industry was -6.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.93%.
CENX is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
KALU is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
Aluminum is widely used in the industries like construction, packaging and automotive sector. The segment has seen increased demand for the lightweight variety in automobiles in improving fuel efficiency. The U.S. aluminum industry generates nearly $71 billion a year in direct economic impact (according to The Aluminum Association). Arconic, Inc, Alcoa Corp and Kaiser Aluminum Corporation are major aluminum companies in the U.S.
CENX | KALU | CENX / KALU | |
Capitalization | 1.82B | 1.21B | 151% |
EBITDA | 440M | 220M | 200% |
Gain YTD | 61.532 | 9.925 | 620% |
P/E Ratio | 6.23 | 25.92 | 24% |
Revenue | 2.1B | 2.98B | 71% |
Total Cash | 32.6M | 45.7M | 71% |
Total Debt | 486M | 1.08B | 45% |
CENX | KALU | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 46 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KALU's Valuation (7) in the Aluminum industry is significantly better than the same rating for CENX (80). This means that KALU’s stock grew significantly faster than CENX’s over the last 12 months.
CENX's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Aluminum industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KALU (100). This means that CENX’s stock grew somewhat faster than KALU’s over the last 12 months.
CENX's SMR Rating (17) in the Aluminum industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KALU (78). This means that CENX’s stock grew somewhat faster than KALU’s over the last 12 months.
CENX's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Aluminum industry is in the same range as KALU (55). This means that CENX’s stock grew similarly to KALU’s over the last 12 months.
CENX's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Aluminum industry is in the same range as KALU (98). This means that CENX’s stock grew similarly to KALU’s over the last 12 months.
CENX | KALU | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago84% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago82% | 24 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 6 days ago73% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago73% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago68% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CENX has been closely correlated with AA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CENX jumps, then AA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CENX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CENX | 100% | -3.92% | ||
AA - CENX | 78% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
NHYDY - CENX | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
KALU - CENX | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
NHYKF - CENX | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
CSTM - CENX | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KALU has been loosely correlated with AA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KALU jumps, then AA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KALU | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KALU | 100% | -1.49% | ||
AA - KALU | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
CSTM - KALU | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
CENX - KALU | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.92% | ||
NHYDY - KALU | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
NHYKF - KALU | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.49% | ||
More |