CESTY
Price
$3.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
540.68M
FUTU
Price
$106.07
Change
-$1.51 (-1.40%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
7.56B
87 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CESTY vs FUTU

Header iconCESTY vs FUTU Comparison
Open Charts CESTY vs FUTUBanner chart's image
Chinese Estates Holdings
Price$3.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.14K
Capitalization540.68M
Futu Holdings
Price$106.07
Change-$1.51 (-1.40%)
Volume$1.73M
Capitalization7.56B
CESTY vs FUTU Comparison Chart
Loading...
FUTU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CESTY vs. FUTU commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CESTY is a Hold and FUTU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CESTY: $3.42 vs. FUTU: $106.07)
Brand notoriety: CESTY and FUTU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CESTY: 89% vs. FUTU: 60%
Market capitalization -- CESTY: $540.68M vs. FUTU: $7.56B
CESTY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $540.68M. FUTU’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CESTY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFUTU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CESTY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FUTU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CESTY and FUTU are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUTU’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FUTU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CESTY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FUTU (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +4.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +93.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

CESTY is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

FUTU is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.57% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUTU($7.56B) has a higher market cap than CESTY($541M). FUTU YTD gains are higher at: 32.604 vs. CESTY (0.000). FUTU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.75B vs. CESTY (-3.26B). FUTU has more cash in the bank: 5.45B vs. CESTY (3.45B). FUTU has less debt than CESTY: FUTU (4.75B) vs CESTY (5.52B). FUTU has higher revenues than CESTY: FUTU (9.21B) vs CESTY (1.3B).
CESTYFUTUCESTY / FUTU
Capitalization541M7.56B7%
EBITDA-3.26B4.75B-69%
Gain YTD0.00032.604-
P/E RatioN/A14.52-
Revenue1.3B9.21B14%
Total Cash3.45B5.45B63%
Total Debt5.52B4.75B116%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CESTY vs FUTU: Fundamental Ratings
CESTY
FUTU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4913
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10058
SMR RATING
1..100
9650
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5044
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5368
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CESTY's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUTU (74). This means that CESTY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUTU’s over the last 12 months.

FUTU's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CESTY (100). This means that FUTU’s stock grew somewhat faster than CESTY’s over the last 12 months.

FUTU's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CESTY (96). This means that FUTU’s stock grew somewhat faster than CESTY’s over the last 12 months.

FUTU's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CESTY (50). This means that FUTU’s stock grew similarly to CESTY’s over the last 12 months.

CESTY's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as FUTU (68). This means that CESTY’s stock grew similarly to FUTU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUTU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUTU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSLV12.030.10
+0.84%
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
GDO11.450.01
+0.04%
Western Asset Global Corporate Opportunity Fund Inc
UJB74.81N/A
N/A
ProShares Ultra High Yield
NUW13.58-0.02
-0.15%
Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund
HFRO5.14-0.02
-0.39%
Highland Opportunities and Income Fund

CESTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CESTY and FDS have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CESTY and FDS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CESTY
1D Price
Change %
CESTY100%
N/A
FDS - CESTY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
FUTU - CESTY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
CCORF - CESTY
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
BOMXF - CESTY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBKCF - CESTY
6%
Poorly correlated
+6.63%
More