Ad is loading...
CESTY
Price
$3.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
FUTU
Price
$92.42
Change
+$3.34 (+3.75%)
Updated
Nov 18, 12:36 PM (EDT)
One day until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CESTY vs FUTU

Header iconCESTY vs FUTU Comparison
Open Charts CESTY vs FUTUBanner chart's image
Chinese Estates Holdings
Price$3.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.86K
CapitalizationN/A
Futu Holdings
Price$92.42
Change+$3.34 (+3.75%)
Volume$1.12K
CapitalizationN/A
CESTY vs FUTU Comparison Chart
Loading...
FUTU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CESTY vs. FUTU commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CESTY is a Hold and FUTU is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CESTY: $3.50 vs. FUTU: $89.08)
Brand notoriety: CESTY and FUTU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CESTY: 139% vs. FUTU: 22%
Market capitalization -- CESTY: $540.68M vs. FUTU: $7.56B
CESTY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $540.68M. FUTU’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CESTY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFUTU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CESTY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FUTU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUTU is a better buy in the long-term than CESTY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUTU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FUTU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CESTY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FUTU (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -5.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUTU is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.31% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUTU($7.56B) has a higher market cap than CESTY($541M). FUTU YTD gains are higher at: 63.061 vs. CESTY (-8.377). FUTU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.75B vs. CESTY (-3.26B). FUTU has more cash in the bank: 5.45B vs. CESTY (3.45B). FUTU has less debt than CESTY: FUTU (4.75B) vs CESTY (5.52B). FUTU has higher revenues than CESTY: FUTU (9.21B) vs CESTY (1.3B).
CESTYFUTUCESTY / FUTU
Capitalization541M7.56B7%
EBITDA-3.26B4.75B-69%
Gain YTD-8.37763.061-13%
P/E RatioN/A14.52-
Revenue1.3B9.21B14%
Total Cash3.45B5.45B63%
Total Debt5.52B4.75B116%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CESTY: Fundamental Ratings
CESTY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUTU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FUTU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XLRE42.980.05
+0.12%
The Real Estate Select Sector SPDR®
GBF103.11N/A
N/A
iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF
QAT18.30-0.02
-0.11%
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF
TGLR30.19-0.24
-0.80%
LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF
DMXF65.82-0.67
-1.01%
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF

CESTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CESTY and FDS have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CESTY and FDS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CESTY
1D Price
Change %
CESTY100%
N/A
FDS - CESTY
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.38%
FUTU - CESTY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
CCORF - CESTY
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
BOMXF - CESTY
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
BBKCF - CESTY
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.24%
More