Online brokerages have attracted significant investor attention amid evolving retail trading trends and technological advancements in financial services. This comparison examines FUTU, the ticker for Futu Holdings Limited, and IBKR, the ticker for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc., two publicly traded companies in the capital markets sector. Traders and investors seeking exposure to fintech-enabled brokerage platforms may find this analysis relevant when evaluating relative performance, business models, and positioning in the current market environment. The focus remains on verifiable developments and observable metrics to support informed assessment of these securities.
Futu Holdings Limited operates a tech-driven online brokerage and wealth management platform primarily serving retail investors in Asia. In recent weeks, FUTU shares have traded near $105, reflecting a year-to-date return of approximately 35% amid broader market activity. The company is scheduled to release second-quarter 2026 financial results on August 20, 2026, following first-quarter revenue growth of 24.7% year-over-year. Sentiment has been influenced by analyst price targets averaging around $150–$155 and ongoing interest in Asian market dynamics. Performance has shown volatility within a 52-week range of roughly $80.50 to $202.53, with trading volumes remaining moderate during recent market sessions.
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. provides an automated global electronic brokerage platform serving both retail and institutional clients across multiple asset classes and regions. In recent market activity, IBKR shares have closed near $92, contributing to year-to-date gains of approximately 43%. The firm continues to report monthly brokerage metrics and has expanded access to additional markets, including the Bucharest Stock Exchange. Sentiment remains supported by consistent client activity and platform enhancements. The stock has traded within a 52-week range of about $58.95 to $97.84, demonstrating relative stability compared to more volatile peers during recent periods.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the most suitable AI trading bots from hundreds available across its platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles, with only the strongest candidates selected for the trending section based on current market conditions. Examples from available data show selections drawn from over 350 total bots, highlighting top performers with metrics such as annualized returns, Sharpe ratios, and profit factors that reflect diverse trading styles. This curated approach allows users to identify bots aligned with specific objectives. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed statistics and real-time insights.
FUTU and IBKR share a focus on online brokerage services yet diverge in scale and emphasis. Futu Holdings targets Asia-centric retail clients with a technology-forward model, while Interactive Brokers offers broader international access and higher trading volumes. Recent momentum favors IBKR with stronger year-to-date returns and steady monthly reporting, contrasting FUTU’s upcoming earnings catalyst. Risk factors include regional regulatory exposure for FUTU versus IBKR’s diversified yet competitive environment. Sector exposure remains tied to capital markets activity, with sentiment reflecting differing growth trajectories and operational footprints.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, relative stability, and recent momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to IBKR over FUTU. This assessment draws from stronger year-to-date performance metrics and platform expansions, though outcomes remain subject to market variables and individual risk tolerance.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FUTU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIBKR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FUTU’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IBKR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
FUTU (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +17.50% price change this week, while IBKR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +1.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +9.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.21%.
FUTU is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2026.
IBKR is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.
These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| FUTU | IBKR | FUTU / IBKR | |
| Capitalization | 17.3B | 42.5B | 41% |
| EBITDA | 14.9B | 9.42B | 158% |
| Gain YTD | -23.499 | 46.269 | -51% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.33 | 37.25 | 33% |
| Revenue | 24B | 10.6B | 226% |
| Total Cash | 23.6B | 5.09B | 464% |
| Total Debt | 22.5B | 12M | 187,500% |
FUTU | IBKR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FUTU's Valuation (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IBKR (93) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FUTU’s stock grew significantly faster than IBKR’s over the last 12 months.
IBKR's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for FUTU (91) in the null industry. This means that IBKR’s stock grew significantly faster than FUTU’s over the last 12 months.
FUTU's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as IBKR (44) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FUTU’s stock grew similarly to IBKR’s over the last 12 months.
IBKR's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FUTU (46) in the null industry. This means that IBKR’s stock grew similarly to FUTU’s over the last 12 months.
IBKR's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUTU (95) in the null industry. This means that IBKR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUTU’s over the last 12 months.
| FUTU | IBKR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 19 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 61% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBKR has been loosely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IBKR jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IBKR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBKR | 100% | +4.47% | ||
| RJF - IBKR | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| HOOD - IBKR | 65% Loosely correlated | +13.70% | ||
| MS - IBKR | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.25% | ||
| GS - IBKR | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.73% | ||
| BMNR - IBKR | 56% Loosely correlated | +5.84% | ||
More | ||||